Team:Tokyo Tech/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 | h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 | ||
{ | { | ||
- | background-color: # | + | background-color: #00508D; |
- | color:# | + | color:#FFFFFF; |
text-align: left; | text-align: left; | ||
} | } |
Revision as of 12:36, 4 October 2011
Safety
For iGEM 2011 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:
Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?
A1. No, our project ideas do not raise any safety issue in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety. All the experiments are carried out in the lab, they are safe for the researcher and the environment, and they do not have any impact outside the lab.
Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? how could other teams learn from your experience?
A2.No, none of the BioBricks parts (or devices) that we have made this year raises any safety issue, they are BL1 and BL2.
Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
A3. Yes there is. The biosafety committee of our organization accepted part of our applications. The other applications are going to be evaluated. After acceptance of all of our applications, we will start wet experiments.
Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.