Team:Tokyo Tech/Modeling/Urea-cooler/urea-cooler
From 2011.igem.org
Line 302: | Line 302: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/e7/TokyoTech_Urea-fig5.png" alt="Fig5" width="750px" /> |
<div class="graph_title"> | <div class="graph_title"> | ||
Fig.5 The reactions related with the urea cycle | Fig.5 The reactions related with the urea cycle | ||
Line 369: | Line 369: | ||
We considered the enzymatic reactions shown in Table 3 to determine the elementary | We considered the enzymatic reactions shown in Table 3 to determine the elementary | ||
flux modes. The scheme of the reaction is shown in Fig.5.<br /> | flux modes. The scheme of the reaction is shown in Fig.5.<br /> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/e7/TokyoTech_Urea-fig5.png" alt="Fig5" width="750px" /> |
<div class="graph_title"> | <div class="graph_title"> | ||
Fig.5 The reactions related with the urea cycle | Fig.5 The reactions related with the urea cycle |
Revision as of 09:14, 4 October 2011
Flux analysis for providing more urea
3.1 Introduction
In metabolic engineering, mathematical modeling is the effective way to increase the products.
Flux analysis, based on the hypothesis that the system is in steady state,
is the effective way to find expect how to increase the products. In this work,
we firstly focused on the concept of 'elementary flux modes' (Schuster, 2000),
which provides metabolic routes both stoichiometrically and thermodynamically feasible.
One elementary mode shows that the carbon atom of urea derives from HCO3- which abounds
in bacterial cytoplasm. Furthermore, in spite of L-glutamine consumption to transfer
the side-chain ammonium group for production of carbamoyl phosphate which transfers
the ammonium group to the urea cycle, ammonium ion can restore L-glutamine from
L-glutamate which is a byproduct of the carbamoyl phosphate production.
These findings suggest that there was little difference in the condition of
containing NH3 or L-glutamine in the culture to obtain more urea. This finding is
proven in previous report's experiment. (Mendel, 1996) We also confirmed that
the urea cycle in E.coli is well designed in a stoichiometrically point of view.
To provide more urea, there are two strategies. First one is to increase the
amount of carbamoyl phosphate which is the reactant of the rate-limiting step of
the urea cycle. The second one is to increase the amount of components of the
urea cycle. We focused on the second one. We identified the elementary flux
modes which produce these compounds from L-glutamine or compounds in TCA cycle.
In all modes, ornithine was intermediate or final product to produce the
components of the urea cycle. We also confirmed that E. coli have no feasible route for
production of the four compounds other than those indicated in Fig.5. Ornithine
production, which requires ATP, NADPH, Acetyl-CoA, and L-glutamine, is thus
the necessary step in this strategy.
Considering that L-arginine, L-glutamate, and L-aspartate are consumed in protein
biosynthesis, these compounds should be supplied from medium or produced by
E.coli itself not only for increase but for maintenance of the cycle. Positions of
L-arginine and L-aspartate in the reaction network show supplement of these
compounds has similer effect on urea production.
"The concept of elementary flux mode provides a mathematical tool to define
and comprehensively describe all metabolic routes that are both stoichiometrically
and thermodynamically feasible for a group of enzymes".
(Schuster, 2000) We can determine the modes which are able to work at steady state
by this analysis.
As application of elementary flux modes, we can expect what substrates are needed
to produce to the substances of interest. Furthermore, we can find expect which
enzymes to overexpress or knockout so as to maximize the products we want.
3.2 Result
Overall reactions related with the urea cycle
We considered the enzymatic reactions shown in Table 3 to determine the elementary
flux modes. The scheme of the reaction is shown in Fig.5.
At first, we attempted to get the elementary flux modes in the condition whose input is L-glutamine like previous reports. (Mendel, 1996) We determined the elementary flux modes by calculating matrix like. The initial tableau is shown below. Large version is here.
We calculated and got the final tableau. Large version is here. The detailed method is here.We got eight modes shown in Fig.6. Each reaction formula is shown in Table 4. We focused on one of the urea producing modes in these eight modes as shown in Fig.7.
If we compared Fig.5 and Fig.7, we can see that in the mode displayed in Fig.7
the reaction which converts L-glutamate to L-ornithine is not needed for urea production.
As shown in Fig.7, the carbon atom of urea derives from HCO3- which abounds
in bacterial cytoplasm.
Considering about nitrogen sources of urea, one of the nitrogen is derived from carbamoyl phosphate. Carbamoyl phosphate transfers the ammonium group to the urea cycle from L-glutamine. Therefore, it seems that L-glutamine is the effective nitrogen source. However, free ammonium ion can restore L-glutamine from L-glutamate which is a byproduct of the carbamoyl phosphate production. It means that L-glutamine and NH3 have the same role to be the nitrogen source for urea. These finding suggest that there was little difference in the condition of containing NH3 or L-glutamine in the culture to obtain more urea. This finding is proven in previous report's experiment. (Mendel, 1996) We also confirmed that the urea cycle in E.coli is well designed in a stoichiometrically point of view.
Increasing the four components of the urea cycle to provide more urea As mentioned before, there are two ways to increase the urea production: increasing the amount of the carbamoyl phosphate and increasing the amount of the four components of the urea cycle. We focused on the second one. All elementary flux modes which produce these compounds from L-glutamine or compounds in TCA cycle produce L-ornithine as intermediate or final product. These modes are shown in Fig.8. Each reaction formula is shown in Table 5. One of the L-ornithine producing modes is shown in Fig.9.
As shown in Fig.9, we can provide L-ornithine by using a reaction which converts L-glutamate to L-ornithine. This is a key reaction to increase the reaction rates in the urea cycle. Therefore supplying ATP, NADPH, acetyl-CoA and L-glutamine or compounds in TCA cycle, is thus necessary step in this strategy. We also confirmed that E. coli have no feasible route for production of the four compounds other than those indicated in Fig 5.
To avoid decreasing urea production by protein biosynthesis Considering that L-arginine, L-glutamate, and L-aspartate are consumed in protein biosynthesis, these compounds should be supplied from medium or produced by E.coli itself not only for increase but for maintenance of the cycle. However, L-glutamate is easily synthesized from L-glutamine. About L-arginine, it is synthesized through L-ornithine mentioned before. Therefore we focused on synthesizing L-aspartate we determined three modes which produce L-aspartate. (Fig.10) One of the modes is shown in Fig11. Each reaction formula is shown in Table 6.
Since L-aspartate and L-arginine are made from TCA cycle, we need pyruvate which is the substrates of the TCA cycle. Pyruvate is provided by glycolysis whose substrate is glucose. Therefore, adding glucose in the media and culturing in aerobic condition is effective way to maintain the urea cycle.
In conclusion, we determined that culturing the bacteria under aerobic conditions (to activate TCA cycle) are effective ways to increase the production of urea.
3.3 Future work
According to our results, we can say that three cycle or pathways are rerated to increase urea production: TCA cycle, glycolysis, the reaction which converts L-glutamate to L-ornithine. Therefore, the next step is the overexpression of the enzymes related with these reactions to increase urea production.