Team:UTP-Panama/Results
From 2011.igem.org
(→Discussion of Results) |
(→Graphs:) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
[[Image:Untitled33.jpg|center ]] | [[Image:Untitled33.jpg|center ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Discussion of Results== | ||
+ | As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C.<br> | ||
+ | The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than the BBa_410000 and our device (expected to work better).<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''The next step in our project:''<br> | ||
+ | Continuing with our original design, we are are planning to use another promoter as the '''CspA''' in stead of HybB, that improve the gene expression under cold shock. | ||
+ | We will keep experimenting with our device. <br><br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | ''It´s ok for us first year with students without Life Sciences background!<br> | ||
+ | VIVA iGEM! We learn a lot.... see you in Indiana and MIT<br>'' |
Revision as of 05:12, 29 September 2011
Home |
Spectrophotometry Results
Discussion of ResultsAs we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C. Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock. The next step in our project: Graphs:Discussion of ResultsAs we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C. Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock. The next step in our project: |