Team:UTP-Panama/Results
From 2011.igem.org
(→Conclusions) |
(→Conclusions) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[File:tres.jpg]]<br> | [[File:tres.jpg]]<br> | ||
- | == | + | ==Discussion of Results== |
As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, and not well under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and not grew at 8°C.<br> | As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, and not well under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and not grew at 8°C.<br> | ||
The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than our device (expected to work better)<br> | The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than our device (expected to work better)<br> | ||
We need to continue the experiments around our device.<br> | We need to continue the experiments around our device.<br> | ||
- | Looking the results for the | + | Looking the results for the BBa_410000, he decrease the capability of the BBa_381001, under cold shock. |
- | + | The next step in our project: | |
+ | Continue with our original design we are are planning to use other promoter (CspA in stead of HybB). | ||
== Graphs: == | == Graphs: == |
Revision as of 04:42, 29 September 2011
Home |
Spectrophotometry Results
Discussion of ResultsAs we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, and not well under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and not grew at 8°C. Graphs: |