Team:UTP-Panama/Experiments
From 2011.igem.org
(→Second Experience) |
(→Second Experience) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
1. Test the BioBrick operation to different substrates and temperatures, using KNO3 40 mM:<br> | 1. Test the BioBrick operation to different substrates and temperatures, using KNO3 40 mM:<br> | ||
a. Substrates: <br> | a. Substrates: <br> | ||
- | i. LB <br> | + | i. LB <br> |
- | ii. Minimal essential medium<br> | + | ii. Minimal essential medium<br> |
- | iii. Saline solution<br> | + | iii. Saline solution<br> |
b. Temperatures:<br> | b. Temperatures:<br> | ||
- | i. 8°C<br> | + | i. 8°C<br> |
- | ii. 23°C<br> | + | ii. 23°C<br> |
- | iii. 37°C<br> | + | iii. 37°C<br> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
2. Improve the characterization of the BioBrick tested in other substrates to study the performance of the promoter.<br> | 2. Improve the characterization of the BioBrick tested in other substrates to study the performance of the promoter.<br> | ||
3. Define the Biobrick promoter strength at the temperatures and selected substrates.<br> | 3. Define the Biobrick promoter strength at the temperatures and selected substrates.<br> | ||
- | |||
Methodology<br> | Methodology<br> |
Revision as of 04:21, 29 September 2011
Home |
Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Experiments 3 | BCCS-Bristol 2010 BiobrickFirst Experience with BBa_k381001Objective:
1. We used six falcon tubes of 25 mL. Three tubes were used for inoculation of the colonies from 06/09/11 and 12/09/11. 2. Two positive controls were prepared and one negative control for each test. 3. To positive control tubes we added 10 ml of liquid LB, 9.7 uL of chloramphenicol (33μg/mL) and 5.00 µL of KNO3 50 mM. 4. To negative control tube we added the same amount of LB and Chloramphenicol specified in the previous line, except KNO3.
5. Each tube was inoculated with the colonies; three of them with the conlonies from 06/09/11 and the rest with colonies from 12/09/11. 6. Tubes were incubated at 37 ° C for 48 hours.
After 48 hours we noticed that all the tubes for both tests showed no change, including positive and negative controls. Our experiment was based on BCCS-Bristol experiment. While reviewing the experiments of Edinburgh in 2009, who designed the promoter used in the BioBrick BCCS-Bristol, we realized that the promoter express better in minimal essential medium than in LB, but we do not rule out that we could have made a mistake in the experience preparation prevented us from showing the right results, which is why we decided to do the experiment again. Second ExperienceObjectives: i. LB b. Temperatures: i. 8°C 2. Improve the characterization of the BioBrick tested in other substrates to study the performance of the promoter. Methodology 5. We used nine falcon tubes of 15 mL. Three tubes for every different substrate at the three temperatures. |