Team:Tec-Monterrey/projectresults
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 591: | Line 591: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p class="textojustif"> | <p class="textojustif"> | ||
- | + | <br>CelD + estA protein fusion Profiles | |
- | + | <br> | |
- | CelD + estA protein fusion Profiles | + | |
- | + | ||
In order to prove the presence of our proteic fusion (celD+estA) we ran several polyacrylamide gels to determine protein profiles on 6 different expression strains (BL21 SI, BL21 STAR, XL1 Blue, C43, BW 27783 and Rosetta Gami), to determine the correct variable combination, which would represent the best yield for our target protein. Said variables were time and induction temperature. | In order to prove the presence of our proteic fusion (celD+estA) we ran several polyacrylamide gels to determine protein profiles on 6 different expression strains (BL21 SI, BL21 STAR, XL1 Blue, C43, BW 27783 and Rosetta Gami), to determine the correct variable combination, which would represent the best yield for our target protein. Said variables were time and induction temperature. | ||
- | + | <br> | |
For our first assay, proteins were inducted in the BL21 SI, XL1 Blue, C43, BW 27783 and Rosetta Gami strains at 25°C for 12h. Once the induction time ended, cells were then lysed using the xTractor extraction kit, from Clontech, in order to obtain soluble and insoluble fractions. | For our first assay, proteins were inducted in the BL21 SI, XL1 Blue, C43, BW 27783 and Rosetta Gami strains at 25°C for 12h. Once the induction time ended, cells were then lysed using the xTractor extraction kit, from Clontech, in order to obtain soluble and insoluble fractions. | ||
- | + | <br> | |
The order of our polyacrylamide gels is as follows: | The order of our polyacrylamide gels is as follows: | ||
- | + | <br> | |
As it is seen, lanes corresponding to the insoluble fraction on transformed and induced strains show a thick band at around 100kDa* according to our molecular weight marker (Bio-Rad). Said band is not found in lanes corresponding to negative controls (wild-types and non-induced transformed cells). | As it is seen, lanes corresponding to the insoluble fraction on transformed and induced strains show a thick band at around 100kDa* according to our molecular weight marker (Bio-Rad). Said band is not found in lanes corresponding to negative controls (wild-types and non-induced transformed cells). | ||
- | + | <br> | |
Based on our results, we can assure that our protein was translated just as planned. Nevertheless, there’s a chance of finding a fraction of our protein as a part of an inclusion body. Then, we ran activity essays to test the correct folding of our protein. | Based on our results, we can assure that our protein was translated just as planned. Nevertheless, there’s a chance of finding a fraction of our protein as a part of an inclusion body. Then, we ran activity essays to test the correct folding of our protein. | ||
- | + | <br> | |
*Our protein’s molecular weight was calculated by means of a predictive program based on the amino-acid sequence codified for our protein (http://www.scripps.edu/~cdputnam/protcalc.html). | *Our protein’s molecular weight was calculated by means of a predictive program based on the amino-acid sequence codified for our protein (http://www.scripps.edu/~cdputnam/protcalc.html). | ||
- | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
Line 624: | Line 621: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/1b/Results04.png"> </center> | <br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/1b/Results04.png"> </center> | ||
<br> | <br> |