Team:Caltech/Project
From 2011.igem.org
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===BisdA and BisdB=== | ===BisdA and BisdB=== | ||
- | |||
[[File:PNT001map.png|frame|Plasmid map of BisdA under the lac promoter [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K620002 K620002] in pSB4A5.]] | [[File:PNT001map.png|frame|Plasmid map of BisdA under the lac promoter [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K620002 K620002] in pSB4A5.]] | ||
[[File:pnt002map.png|frame|Plamid map of BisdB under the tet promoter [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K620003 K6230003]]] | [[File:pnt002map.png|frame|Plamid map of BisdB under the tet promoter [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K620003 K6230003]]] | ||
+ | We sourced genetic material for BisdA and BisdB from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. The sequence listed for these parts had the wrong codons listed, so we sequenced the parts to determine the correct codons. We then designed genetic constructs with inducible promoters, ribosome binding regions, and terminators in plasmid backbones for each gene. We accessed these parts by transforming DNA from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts into chemically competent ''E. coli'' for construction, and used PCR to extract our desired components. We attempted several methods of assembly for these pieces, including traditional assembly, Gibson assembly, and a combination of PCR assembly for the coding construct and standard assembly to insert the coding construct into a backbone. After assembly of these components was complete, we combined the two coding constructs into one vector and expressed this vector in ''E. coli'' for experimentation. We are now inducing production of BisdA and BisdB so that we can investigate their ability to degrade EDCs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br style="clear: both" /> | ||
===Gibson Assembly=== | ===Gibson Assembly=== | ||
[[File:7-21gibsontime.jpg|frame|A gel showing Gibson assembly of GFP, promoter, terminator and pSB4A5 and BisdA, lac promoter, terminator and pSB4A5 (pNT001) stopped at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes. Generally, over time, the smaller bands decrease in brightness and larger bands increase in brightness]] | [[File:7-21gibsontime.jpg|frame|A gel showing Gibson assembly of GFP, promoter, terminator and pSB4A5 and BisdA, lac promoter, terminator and pSB4A5 (pNT001) stopped at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes. Generally, over time, the smaller bands decrease in brightness and larger bands increase in brightness]] | ||
- | We attempted to use Gibson Assembly for creating composite BioBrick plasmids including inducible BisdA and BisdB. After many weeks of doing Gibson reactions and screening for colonies, we have observed that Gibson assembly may not be the most efficient and reliable method of assembling BioBricks. Gibson assembly may be a quicker method of cloning than using restriction enzymes and ligase, but this work indicates that quality and quantity of plasmids produced using this method are not as easily reproducible as standard assembly for assembly of multiple BioBrick parts is. If iGEM teams wish to use this method for assembly, we have shown that limiting the total DNA in the Gibson reaction, limiting the number of parts being combined in the reaction and using extremely competent cells improves the ratio of experimental colonies to negative control colonies. These can then be screened using colony PCR or sequencing. However, the high complementarity between the BioBrick prefix and suffix could contribute to the high numbers of self-ligation we observed. Due to the enzymes in the Gibson reaction, phosphatase cannot be used, a common procedure in standard assembly. | + | We attempted to use Gibson Assembly for creating composite BioBrick plasmids including inducible BisdA and BisdB. After many weeks of doing Gibson reactions and screening for colonies, we have observed that Gibson assembly may not be the most efficient and reliable method of assembling BioBricks. Gibson assembly may be a quicker method of cloning than using restriction enzymes and ligase, but this work indicates that quality and quantity of plasmids produced using this method are not as easily reproducible as standard assembly for assembly of multiple BioBrick parts is. If iGEM teams wish to use this method for assembly, we have shown that limiting the total DNA in the Gibson reaction, limiting the number of parts being combined in the reaction and using extremely competent cells improves the ratio of experimental colonies to negative control colonies. These can then be screened using colony PCR or sequencing. However, the high complementarity between the BioBrick prefix and suffix could contribute to the high numbers of self-ligation we observed. Due to the enzymes in the Gibson reaction, phosphatase cannot be used, a common procedure in standard assembly.<br/> |
We recommend PCR assembly, if possible, of composite BioBrick inserts rather than multi-step standard assembly to increase the efficiency of assembling of BioBrick parts. Future iGEM teams are advised to try different methods of assembly and cloning in parallel, as the parts are not as modular as stated and each combination behaves differently than others. | We recommend PCR assembly, if possible, of composite BioBrick inserts rather than multi-step standard assembly to increase the efficiency of assembling of BioBrick parts. Future iGEM teams are advised to try different methods of assembly and cloning in parallel, as the parts are not as modular as stated and each combination behaves differently than others. | ||
+ | <br style="clear: both" /> | ||
===DDT Dehydrochlorinase=== | ===DDT Dehydrochlorinase=== | ||
- | [[File:DDT_blank.jpg| | + | [[File:DDTdechlorinase.jpg|frame|The band indicating DDT dehydrochlorinase is visible in both elution columns, between the 21,500 and 31,000 g/mole bands. The DDT protein is 23,500 g/mole.]] |
- | + | [[File:DDT_blank.jpg|frame|GCMS of DDT]] | |
- | + | We found DDT Dehydrochlorinase in the literature as an enzyme discovered to degrade DDT. We found the amino acid code for this enzyme on GenBank. We used [http://helixweb.nih.gov/dnaworks/ DNAWorks] to design oligos for assembling this enzyme optimized in E. coli. We assembled this gene using PIPE cloning. We then inserted this gene in a pET vector with a his-tag and overexpressed it in ''E. coli''. We purified the protein and ran it on a gel, indicating that this gene can be expressed in ''E. coli''. | |
+ | We next conducted degradation experiments with DDT using electrospray GCMS. As shown in the GCMS of DDT without degradation enzymes, there is a clear band at 235 grams/mole. DDT's molar mass is 355. This indicates that the original structure of DDT loses a carbon and three chlorines to form a structure with this mass. | ||
+ | <br style="clear: both" /> | ||
===Cytochrome p450s=== | ===Cytochrome p450s=== | ||
[[File:BPA_electrospray.jpg|Frame|HPLC-electrospray of BPA]] | [[File:BPA_electrospray.jpg|Frame|HPLC-electrospray of BPA]] |
Revision as of 08:17, 28 September 2011
Project |
Bioremediation of Endocrine Disruptors Using Genetically Modified Escherichia ColiFile:Caltech team.png Your team picture Endocrine disruptors, or substances that mimic estrogen in the body, have detrimental biological effects on the reproduction of several species of fish and birds; the Caltech team focuses on bioremediation of these toxins. Our goal is to create a system housed in E. coli that can be used to process water and remove endocrine disruptors on a large scale. We focus on isolating degradation systems for the common endocrine disruptors bisphenol A (BPA), DDT, nonylphenol and 17a-ethynylestradiol. We synthesized known degradation enzymes DDT dehydrochlorinase, BisdA and BisdB, and characterized the behavior of these enzymes when acting on our target endocrine disruptors. In addition, we explored the potential of certain cytochrome p450s to initiate degradation of these chemicals, focusing on WT-F87A degradation of BPA. Finally, we characterized the functionality of E. coli protein processing when E. coli is deployed as an easily containable biofilm on various substances in aqueous environments. Introduction:Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are chemicals that interact with the endocrine system by binding to hormone receptors, causing problems in sexual development and reproduction of organisms. These chemicals are introduced to the environment from improper disposal of plastic wastes, hormonal medications remaining in human waste, and pesticides. Areas with high concentrations of estrogen in water have been shown to correlate with a higher percentage of intersex fish, and pesticides such as DDT have been shown to impact the development of the female reproductive tract in birds. Many EDCs are persistent organic pollutants, and even though regulations have been put in place for pesticide use and industrial production of endocrine disruptors, many of these chemicals continue to pollute bodies of water in significant concentrations. BisdA and BisdBWe sourced genetic material for BisdA and BisdB from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. The sequence listed for these parts had the wrong codons listed, so we sequenced the parts to determine the correct codons. We then designed genetic constructs with inducible promoters, ribosome binding regions, and terminators in plasmid backbones for each gene. We accessed these parts by transforming DNA from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts into chemically competent E. coli for construction, and used PCR to extract our desired components. We attempted several methods of assembly for these pieces, including traditional assembly, Gibson assembly, and a combination of PCR assembly for the coding construct and standard assembly to insert the coding construct into a backbone. After assembly of these components was complete, we combined the two coding constructs into one vector and expressed this vector in E. coli for experimentation. We are now inducing production of BisdA and BisdB so that we can investigate their ability to degrade EDCs.
Gibson AssemblyWe attempted to use Gibson Assembly for creating composite BioBrick plasmids including inducible BisdA and BisdB. After many weeks of doing Gibson reactions and screening for colonies, we have observed that Gibson assembly may not be the most efficient and reliable method of assembling BioBricks. Gibson assembly may be a quicker method of cloning than using restriction enzymes and ligase, but this work indicates that quality and quantity of plasmids produced using this method are not as easily reproducible as standard assembly for assembly of multiple BioBrick parts is. If iGEM teams wish to use this method for assembly, we have shown that limiting the total DNA in the Gibson reaction, limiting the number of parts being combined in the reaction and using extremely competent cells improves the ratio of experimental colonies to negative control colonies. These can then be screened using colony PCR or sequencing. However, the high complementarity between the BioBrick prefix and suffix could contribute to the high numbers of self-ligation we observed. Due to the enzymes in the Gibson reaction, phosphatase cannot be used, a common procedure in standard assembly. We recommend PCR assembly, if possible, of composite BioBrick inserts rather than multi-step standard assembly to increase the efficiency of assembling of BioBrick parts. Future iGEM teams are advised to try different methods of assembly and cloning in parallel, as the parts are not as modular as stated and each combination behaves differently than others.
DDT DehydrochlorinaseWe found DDT Dehydrochlorinase in the literature as an enzyme discovered to degrade DDT. We found the amino acid code for this enzyme on GenBank. We used [http://helixweb.nih.gov/dnaworks/ DNAWorks] to design oligos for assembling this enzyme optimized in E. coli. We assembled this gene using PIPE cloning. We then inserted this gene in a pET vector with a his-tag and overexpressed it in E. coli. We purified the protein and ran it on a gel, indicating that this gene can be expressed in E. coli.
We next conducted degradation experiments with DDT using electrospray GCMS. As shown in the GCMS of DDT without degradation enzymes, there is a clear band at 235 grams/mole. DDT's molar mass is 355. This indicates that the original structure of DDT loses a carbon and three chlorines to form a structure with this mass.
Cytochrome p450s
Selection of EDC-Degrading OrganismsIn order to identify an organism capable of degrading our EDCs, we collected dry and wet samples from the Los Angeles river and used these samples to inoculate liquid minimal media cultures in which the sole source of carbon was the EDC. (We used media with and without a vitamin mix to account for any compounds the organisms might not be capable of manufacturing themselves, but the presence or absence of the vitamin mix seems to have made little difference in the growth of the organisms; cultures exhibited equivalent growth both with and without the vitamin mix.) We sequentially used these cultures to inoculate new cultures every two to three days over an eight-week period in order to further isolate organisms. At the third week we plated the cultures on LB plates and observed significant growth of many different types of organisms (figure 1), indicating that our cultures contained organisms capable of surviving on our EDCs. To further isolate these organisms, colonies from each culture were resuspended in liquid minimal media; as before, new liquid minimal media cultures were inoculated from each of these every two to three days. The cultures were plated again on LB in the eighth week (figure 2) and again, significant growth was observed. At this stage, we attempted to plate our cultures on solid minimal media; however, all of the compounds we chose are insoluble in water, which makes traditional plating impossible. We attempted several alternate methods of plating the EDCs together with the minimal media and cultures, but all these attempts were unsuccessful. Thus, although we demonstrated the presence of EDC-degrading organisms in our cultures, we were unable to fully isolate any organisms for further study.
Biofilm ColumnsWe cultured top10 E. coli biofilms on glass beads and stained with crystal violet to show growth the bacteria. Our next step was to create a construct within the top10 bacteria which constitutively expressed the lacZ gene. Since lacZ cleaves X-gal, a clear chemical, into its component dye and galactose, the lacZ-infused bacteria was able to change a solutio of X-gal bright blue in under 10 minutes. The final part of this experiment would be to grow the lacZ-infused bacteria into a biofilm onto glass beads, then flow the X-gal solution through a column of the biofilm beads. The effluent flow should be bright blue. However, this last bit hasn't been completed as of the iGEM due date.
|