Team:USC/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Our Approach to Biological Safety Issues Regarding Our CRISPR Project) |
(→Our Approach to Biological Safety Concerns Regarding Our CRISPR Project) |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
==BioBrick Safety Issues== | ==BioBrick Safety Issues== | ||
<p>No, our BioBrick parts and novel ones do not pose any issues in safety. All parts are being transformed in non-pathogenic E. coli and being expressed in vivo.</p> | <p>No, our BioBrick parts and novel ones do not pose any issues in safety. All parts are being transformed in non-pathogenic E. coli and being expressed in vivo.</p> | ||
- | + | ==Biological Safety Provisions== | |
- | + | <p>Yes, the safety aspect of our project is being supervised by the Institutional Biosafety Committee at USC. All of the protocols are approved by the IBC at USC.</p> | |
- | + | ==Thoughts on How to Improve Safety in iGEM== | |
- | Yes, the safety aspect of our project is being supervised by the Institutional Biosafety Committee at USC. All of the protocols are approved by the IBC at USC. | + | <p>Sometimes, there seems to be a disconnection between the scientific community and the general public when discussing safety issues that stem from scientific research. With a new and rapidly evolving field that is synthetic biology entering the frame, we encourage our fellow colleagues and teams to be open-minded and communicative to the public regarding not only the benefits of the projects and synthetic biology as a whole, but also the potential harms, both physical and non-physical (e.g. morality) so that the public can be well-informed and hopefully accepting of this new science.</p> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | Sometimes, there seems to be a disconnection between the scientific community and the general public when discussing safety issues that stem from scientific research. With a new and rapidly evolving field that is synthetic biology entering the frame, we encourage our fellow colleagues and teams to be open-minded and communicative to the public regarding not only the benefits of the projects and synthetic biology as a whole, but also the potential harms, both physical and non-physical (e.g. morality) so that the public can be well-informed and hopefully accepting of this new science. | + | |
</td> | </td> |