Team:BU Wellesley Software/Notebook/ShannonNotebook
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
* The 2.5A, B, and C all refer to various samples that were ligated with 2.5 uL of ligase. For example, sample 1A was ligated with 1 uL of ligase. | * The 2.5A, B, and C all refer to various samples that were ligated with 2.5 uL of ligase. For example, sample 1A was ligated with 1 uL of ligase. | ||
- | * Glycerol stocks were also made from the | + | * Glycerol stocks were also made from the week's successful overnight cultures. |
+ | * Plasmid preps were done on that week’s successful transformations. | ||
+ | * To increase DNA concentration in ligations, I tried ethanol precipitation with GFPc. | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| style="width:800px;background:#87CEEB;text-align:justify;font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin-top:5px;" cellspacing="18" | ||
+ | |style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;font-size:1em;color:#ea8828;"|<h5>WEEK 4: 7/04-7/08/2011</h5> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Transformations were done of various parts in the beginning of the week (including BFP + Term and YFPc + R2000). | ||
+ | * Ligation was also performed on ECFP + Term and EYFP + Term. Transformations were then done using those ligations. | ||
+ | * However, transformations were not successful (no colonies grew). | ||
+ | * Plasmid preps were done earlier in the week. Nanodrop was then done. Yielded decent values (ranging from 25.6-61.9 ng/uL). | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| style="width:800px;background:#87CEEB;text-align:justify;font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin-top:5px;" cellspacing="18" | ||
+ | |style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;font-size:1em;color:#ea8828;"|<h5>WEEK 4: 7/11-7/15/2011</h5> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Restriction digest was done on ECFP and EYFP (both cut with E + S). | ||
+ | * Gel was run later that day of RD products. However, no bands were visible. | ||
+ | * Re-did restriction digest of ECFP and EYFP. Ran a gel and did gel extraction. ECFP had a concentration on 41.8 ng/uL and EYFP had a concentration of 18.8 ng/uL. | ||
+ | * To ensure that ligations were not producing false positives, CIP was used on the backbone. | ||
+ | * Ligations were done using a CIP backbone and a non-CIP backbone. | ||
+ | * Transformations were then done using both CIP and non-CIP backbone and sat on the bench top over the weekend. | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| style="width:800px;background:#87CEEB;text-align:justify;font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin-top:5px;" cellspacing="18" | ||
+ | |style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;font-size:1em;color:#ea8828;"|<h5>WEEK 4: 7/18-7/22/2011</h5> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Transformations from the previous week worked (both CIP and non-CIP). | ||
+ | * Made overnight cultures using the CIP and non-CIP transformations. | ||
+ | * Decided to troubleshoot ligations by trying different ratios and different lengths of time. | ||
+ | * Transformed ligations that were used to troubleshoot. | ||
+ | * Overnight cultures did not grow. Streaked plates from glycerol stocks and made overnight cultures. | ||
+ | * Attempted to ligate ECFP + Term and EYFP + Term. Also transformed the ligations. Put in the 37 C overnight. | ||
+ | |} |
Revision as of 02:23, 25 August 2011
Contents |
WEEK 1: 6/06-6/10/2011 |
|
WEEK 2: 6/13-6/17/2011 |
|
WEEK 3: 6/20-6/24/2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WEEK 4: 6/27-7/01/2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WEEK 4: 7/04-7/08/2011 |
|
WEEK 4: 7/11-7/15/2011 |
|
WEEK 4: 7/18-7/22/2011 |
|