"
Team:UC Davis/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<div class="floatbox"> | <div class="floatbox"> | ||
| - | <font size="4">Environmental Safety</font> | + | <font size="4">Environmental Safety</font><hr /> |
Our project raises few biological safety concerns with regard to researcher, public, or environmental safety. We are using standard parts from the registry which have been used by many teams and research labs, are included in the distribution every year and are known to be safe. We minimize the risk of public and environmental hazards by keeping any dangerous compounds contained within the lab in designated areas. All waste liquids that might contain cells from the bacterial strains we work with are bleached prior to proper disposal, and all contaminated plastic waste is autoclaved. | Our project raises few biological safety concerns with regard to researcher, public, or environmental safety. We are using standard parts from the registry which have been used by many teams and research labs, are included in the distribution every year and are known to be safe. We minimize the risk of public and environmental hazards by keeping any dangerous compounds contained within the lab in designated areas. All waste liquids that might contain cells from the bacterial strains we work with are bleached prior to proper disposal, and all contaminated plastic waste is autoclaved. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 17 August 2011
Our Sponsors
Start a Family
Got a favorite BioBrick? Check our our process for expanding basic parts into part families.Criteria
View our judging criteria for iGEM 2011 here.
1.Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?
3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
- researcher safety? No
- public safety? No
- environmental safety? No
2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?
- None of our parts raise any safety issues. If we discover that any part of our project is potentially dangerous, we will note it on the Registry page and take extra precaution when working with it.
3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
- They approve of it and are fully supportive.
- N/a
4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
- We think that proper testing and characterization of each part is necessary in order to fully understand how it will work in every situation. In addition, we think that the Registry could have a stricter distribution policy.
Environmental Safety
Our project raises few biological safety concerns with regard to researcher, public, or environmental safety. We are using standard parts from the registry which have been used by many teams and research labs, are included in the distribution every year and are known to be safe. We minimize the risk of public and environmental hazards by keeping any dangerous compounds contained within the lab in designated areas. All waste liquids that might contain cells from the bacterial strains we work with are bleached prior to proper disposal, and all contaminated plastic waste is autoclaved.
Our project raises few biological safety concerns with regard to researcher, public, or environmental safety. We are using standard parts from the registry which have been used by many teams and research labs, are included in the distribution every year and are known to be safe. We minimize the risk of public and environmental hazards by keeping any dangerous compounds contained within the lab in designated areas. All waste liquids that might contain cells from the bacterial strains we work with are bleached prior to proper disposal, and all contaminated plastic waste is autoclaved.
Our BioBrick parts pose little safety risk. As always, the use of antibiotic resistance in bacterial selection does introduce the possibility of spreading this resistance to bacterial populations outside of our lab. Because of this, we take care to ensure that there is as little transmittance as possible between our antibiotic resistant strains in the lab and bacteria populations in the local environment.
Yes, there is a biosafety group here at UC Davis. Our lab is inspected regularly and has passed the safety tests each time.
We think that accountability and responsible engineering are key when designing a safe and effective system. Thorough testing is helpful in producing safe products, and our project involves a great amount of characterization of our constructs. Adding barcodes or other identifying features to DNA parts submitted from our lab to the registry could promote responsibility for parts and accountability for any future safety concerns, but great care should be taken to ensure that any DNA-based tags on parts do not affect their function.
