Team:Tokyo Tech/Safety

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 4: Line 4:
<p>For iGEM 2011 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:</p>
<p>For iGEM 2011 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:</p>
-
<p>Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?</p>
+
<p><b>Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?</b></p>
-
<p>A1. For review of our applications by a local biosafety group, researcher safety, public safety and environmental safety are going to be evaluated.<br />
+
<p>A1. No, our project ideas do not raise any safety issue in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety. All the experiments are carried out in the lab, they are safe for the researcher and the environment, and they do not have any impact outside the lab.</p>
-
In this meaning, our answer is all YES.</p>
+
<p><b>Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? how could other teams learn from your experience?</b></p>
-
<p>Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,</p>
+
<p>A2.No, none of the BioBricks parts (or devices) that we have made this year raises any safety issue, they are BL1 and BL2. </p>
-
<p>A2.No. Our parts are of safety level one and two. We are going to use genes which are analyzed in peer-reviewed papers.</p>
+
<p><b>Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?</b></p>
-
<p>Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?</p>
+
<p>A3. Yes there is. The biosafety committee of our organization accepted part of our applications. The other applications are going to be evaluated.  After acceptance of all of our applications, we will start wet experiments.</p>
-
<p>A3. Yes</p>
+
<p><b>Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?</b></p>
-
<p>If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?</p>
+
-
<p>The biosafety committee of our organization accepted part of our applications. The other applications are going to be evaluated.  After acceptance of our applications, we start wet experiments.</p>
+
-
<p>Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering</p>
+
<p>A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.</p>
<p>A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.</p>

Revision as of 05:37, 1 September 2011


For iGEM 2011 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:

Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?

A1. No, our project ideas do not raise any safety issue in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety. All the experiments are carried out in the lab, they are safe for the researcher and the environment, and they do not have any impact outside the lab.

Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? how could other teams learn from your experience?

A2.No, none of the BioBricks parts (or devices) that we have made this year raises any safety issue, they are BL1 and BL2.

Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?

A3. Yes there is. The biosafety committee of our organization accepted part of our applications. The other applications are going to be evaluated. After acceptance of all of our applications, we will start wet experiments.

Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.

This is a template page. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS.
You are provided with this team page template with which to start the iGEM season. You may choose to personalize it to fit your team but keep the same "look." Or you may choose to take your team wiki to a different level and design your own wiki. You can find some examples HERE.
You MUST have a team description page, a project abstract, a complete project description, a lab notebook, and a safety page. PLEASE keep all of your pages within your teams namespace.



You can write a background of your team here. Give us a background of your team, the members, etc. Or tell us more about something of your choosing.
File:Tokyo Tech logo.png
200px

Tell us more about your project. Give us background. Use this is the abstract of your project. Be descriptive but concise (1-2 paragraphs)

File:Tokyo Tech team.png
Your team picture
Team Example


Home Team Official Team Profile Project Parts Submitted to the Registry Modeling Notebook Safety Attributions


Safety

Please use this page to answer the safety questions posed on the safety page.

Retrieved from "http://2011.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Safety"