"
Team:WHU-China/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
(→Safety) |
(→Safety) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
As to the researcher safety, all of our researchers were trained well and pasted the safety test before we carry out our project in the laboratory. Besides, all of our biomaterials are well disposed to be environmentally friendly. | As to the researcher safety, all of our researchers were trained well and pasted the safety test before we carry out our project in the laboratory. Besides, all of our biomaterials are well disposed to be environmentally friendly. | ||
All of our work is performed under the approval of Pathogenic Microbiology Laboratory Bio-safety Regulations of China and the Biological Experimental Safety Regulations of Wuhan University (WHU). | All of our work is performed under the approval of Pathogenic Microbiology Laboratory Bio-safety Regulations of China and the Biological Experimental Safety Regulations of Wuhan University (WHU). | ||
| - | + | _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | |
Q: Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, | Q: Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, | ||
- did you document these issues in the Registry? | - did you document these issues in the Registry? | ||
Revision as of 16:11, 11 July 2011
| You can write a background of your team here. Give us a background of your team, the members, etc. Or tell us more about something of your choosing. |  |
|
Tell us more about your project. Give us background. Use this is the abstract of your project. Be descriptive but concise (1-2 paragraphs) | File:WHU-China team.png Your team picture |
| Team Example |
| Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Notebook | Safety | Attributions |
|---|
Safety
Q: Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: - researcher safety, - public safety, or - environmental safety?
A:No. Our practice is based on the safety guidelines detailed below. Our project doesn’t involve pathogenic microorganisms or producing any dangerous products and none of the modifications are pathogenic. So the project will not raise any safety issues in terms of these three concepts. As to the researcher safety, all of our researchers were trained well and pasted the safety test before we carry out our project in the laboratory. Besides, all of our biomaterials are well disposed to be environmentally friendly. All of our work is performed under the approval of Pathogenic Microbiology Laboratory Bio-safety Regulations of China and the Biological Experimental Safety Regulations of Wuhan University (WHU). _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Q: Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, - did you document these issues in the Registry? - how did you manage to handle the safety issue? - How could other teams learn from your experience?
A: No, all of the BioBricks we sent or intended to send were made from DNA parts usually used in our host lab, they are all considered BSL1 with no particular safety issues.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Q: Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? - If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? - If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
A: Yes, at Wuhan University, we have our own biosafety group which give guidelines to all of our work in the laboratory. Such guidelines include safety issues on laboratory safety, public safety, environmental safety, etc. Before we carried out our experiments, the professors helped to confirm the safety of the project. They also supervised our experimental safety and gave us guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Q: Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
A: Since different laboratories follow different regulations, experience sharing seems more important. Workshops and jamborees held in each year has provides a good opportunity to widely spread the most valuable and latest technologies and developments on securities issues. What’s more, there should be an official guidelines related to biosafety issues, which is suitable for just this competition. It is necessary to upload these official guidelines on the main page of iGEM. And a booklet of them will be helpful and welcomed. There must be a basis of judging the safety of each bio-parts. All the biobricks should be classified into different level of biosafety and the information should be also informed on each biobricks’ main page. As to some dangerous parts, the potential danger and the right usage should be well illustrated.
