"
Team:HKU-Hong Kong/Results
From 2011.igem.org
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<LI>Note that the data collected are considered only when difference between values have the P-value is less than 0.05. | <LI>Note that the data collected are considered only when difference between values have the P-value is less than 0.05. | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
<div ALIGN=CENTER> | <div ALIGN=CENTER> | ||
{| style="width:254px;background:#99EE63;text-align:center;font-family: georgia, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin- top:5px;padding: 2px;" cellspacing="5"; | {| style="width:254px;background:#99EE63;text-align:center;font-family: georgia, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin- top:5px;padding: 2px;" cellspacing="5"; | ||
|- | |- | ||
| - | |[[Image:results_3.jpg| | + | |[[Image:results_3.jpg|500px]] |
|- | |- | ||
| - | | | + | |Diagram showing the expression level. |
|} | |} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
From the above result, in different promoter driven fusion tetR-HNS proteins system, their repressions are different. For example, when using J23103 promoter, all designed repressor and also the tetR have higher fluorescence intensity than the control. As for J23109, there is lower fluorescence intensity in tetR-HNS but higher intensity when native HNS is also expressed. In other two promoters, the results are also unexpected. It seems that tetO-1 site is not suitable when the tetR recognition site is in too close proximity with the pLac promoter and the EGFP gene. | From the above result, in different promoter driven fusion tetR-HNS proteins system, their repressions are different. For example, when using J23103 promoter, all designed repressor and also the tetR have higher fluorescence intensity than the control. As for J23109, there is lower fluorescence intensity in tetR-HNS but higher intensity when native HNS is also expressed. In other two promoters, the results are also unexpected. It seems that tetO-1 site is not suitable when the tetR recognition site is in too close proximity with the pLac promoter and the EGFP gene. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 47: | ||
{| style="width:254px;background:#99EE63;text-align:center;font-family: georgia, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin- top:5px;padding: 2px;" cellspacing="5"; | {| style="width:254px;background:#99EE63;text-align:center;font-family: georgia, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin- top:5px;padding: 2px;" cellspacing="5"; | ||
|- | |- | ||
| - | |[[Image:results_4.jpg| | + | |[[Image:results_4.jpg|500px]] |
|- | |- | ||
| - | | | + | |Diagram showing the expression level. |
|} | |} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
<div ALIGN=CENTER> | <div ALIGN=CENTER> | ||
{| style="width:254px;background:#99EE63;text-align:center;font-family: georgia, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin- top:5px;padding: 2px;" cellspacing="5"; | {| style="width:254px;background:#99EE63;text-align:center;font-family: georgia, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;color:#000000;margin- top:5px;padding: 2px;" cellspacing="5"; | ||
|- | |- | ||
| - | |[[Image:results_5.jpg| | + | |[[Image:results_5.jpg|500px]] |
|- | |- | ||
| - | | | + | |Diagram showing the expression level. |
|} | |} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
On the other hand, when using promoters J23109, J23116, J23106, there is a subsequent lower flurescence intensity detected. When only tetR is produced, there is already some repression. But the use of our fusion protein (tetR-HNS), the fluorescence is even lowered. This provides an insight for us that our designed repression system could be working. When we also expressed the native H-NS in addition to the bacteria own H-NS, the fluorescence intensity is the lowest. It can be reasoned that when our fusion protein tetR-HNS bind to the tet-O sites, the chance for oligomerization and hence repression is increased as there are more native H-NS available. | On the other hand, when using promoters J23109, J23116, J23106, there is a subsequent lower flurescence intensity detected. When only tetR is produced, there is already some repression. But the use of our fusion protein (tetR-HNS), the fluorescence is even lowered. This provides an insight for us that our designed repression system could be working. When we also expressed the native H-NS in addition to the bacteria own H-NS, the fluorescence intensity is the lowest. It can be reasoned that when our fusion protein tetR-HNS bind to the tet-O sites, the chance for oligomerization and hence repression is increased as there are more native H-NS available. | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 5 October 2011
| Results | ||||||||||
| GFP intensity | ||||||||||
|
Our team have successfully inserted the tetO2-GFP sites (tetO2-0 EGFP , tetO2-0 sfGFP and tetO2-1 EGFP) into the E.Coli MG1655 genome (attTn7 site) by recombination with our designed plasmid containing the tet-O2-GFP site. Subsequently, we transformed our silencer plasmid into these tetO2-GP strains and the GFP intensity is measured.
The untransformed E.Coli MG1655 (tetO2-0 EGFP, tetO2-0 sfGFP or tetO2-1 EGFP incorporated into the genome) is set as control and the fluorescence intensity is calibrated as 100%.
From the above result, in different promoter driven fusion tetR-HNS proteins system, their repressions are different. For example, when using J23103 promoter, all designed repressor and also the tetR have higher fluorescence intensity than the control. As for J23109, there is lower fluorescence intensity in tetR-HNS but higher intensity when native HNS is also expressed. In other two promoters, the results are also unexpected. It seems that tetO-1 site is not suitable when the tetR recognition site is in too close proximity with the pLac promoter and the EGFP gene.
On the other hand, when using promoters J23109, J23116, J23106, there is a subsequent lower flurescence intensity detected. When only tetR is produced, there is already some repression. But the use of our fusion protein (tetR-HNS), the fluorescence is even lowered. This provides an insight for us that our designed repression system could be working. When we also expressed the native H-NS in addition to the bacteria own H-NS, the fluorescence intensity is the lowest. It can be reasoned that when our fusion protein tetR-HNS bind to the tet-O sites, the chance for oligomerization and hence repression is increased as there are more native H-NS available. | ||||||||||
| Gel shift assay | ||||||||||
|
|
