Team:HKUST-Hong Kong/asm.html
From 2011.igem.org
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <h4 align=left><a name=method></a> | + | <h4 align=left><a name=method></a>1. How to select against E. CRAFT cells that fail to take up the vector plasmid? Our alternative selection method</h4> |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | <p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | ||
+ | Our E. CRAFT (<i>Escherichia coli</i> Re-engineered for Antibiotics-Free Transformation) is designed to have one of its essential genes (genes that are required for viability) removed from its genome, and relocated into an engineered plasmid “Dummy”. This would result in E. CRAFT’s dependency on this extra- chromosomal copy of the essential gene for survival, and hence the addiction to the pDummy. By having direct control over the replication of pDummy, we dictate the life and death of E. CRAFT (and hence the name pDummy). | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | + | Here, we introduce a heat-sensitive origin of replication as the sole origin of pDummy. When we intend to switch off the pDummy’s replication, we can incubate E. CRAFT at a temperature above its optimum 30ᵒC . This origin would then cease to function, and pDummy cannot be maintained.[11] Deprived of the essential gene and its corresponding vital product, E. CRAFT will not be able to propagate unless it receives a heat insensitive analog of pDummy. | |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | + | This analog plasmid, named “pCarrier”, is essentially our E. CRAFT- compatible vector in cloning. Under an unfavorably high incubation temperature, only E. CRAFT cells that are transformed with the insert-bearing pCarrier would be able to propagate and survive. The remaining E. CRAFT cells would not be able to undergo division and would eventually be eliminated from the population. In this sense, the pDummy can be considered to be "shuffled out" by pCarrier. Our designed selection system, in short, bases itself on plasmid shuffling, with no involvement of antibiotic resistance genes in any cloning step.<a href=#top>[Top]</a><br> | |
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
- | |||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <h4 align=left><a name=assembly></a> | + | <h4 align=left><a name=assembly></a>2. Stepping into the heart of construction - methods of assembly</h4> |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | <p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b>2.1 Construction and maintenance of an antibiotic-resistance-gene-free plasmid through antibiotic selection – the unavoidable evil two plasmid system</b><br> |
- | Our ultimate goal is to construct | + | Our ultimate goal is to construct the E. CRAFT without conferring any new antibiotic resistance on it. For this reason, no resistance gene should be found in our dummy plasmid: the pDummy. Yet, ensuring the maintenance of such a plasmid in its host bacterium would be a challenge, unless the cell needs the plasmid for survival (essential- gene- loss induced addiction: loss of the essential gene in bacterial genome causes dependence on the extra-chromosomal copy in pDummy). Inconveniently, however, this addiction can only be achieved after the introduction of the plasmid. |
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | + | The solution to this problem is to develop mutuality between pDummy and another plasmid by exploiting the nature of positively- regulated origins of replication. Well studied examples of such origins include those of pSC101 [2] and R6K plasmids [4, 5, 7, 8], where the origins of replication (OR) appear together with a constitutive gene (G). Initiation of replication happens if and only if the trans- element of the gene is provided. | |
+ | <br> | ||
- | + | </p> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
+ | |||
Let’s consider the following scenario: <br> | Let’s consider the following scenario: <br> | ||
- | i. | + | i. G is placed on the pDummy, which lacks a selection marker but is equipped with a normal replication origin<br> |
- | ii. | + | ii. OR is the sole origin of replication of another plasmid (here we introduce a new plasmid, pToolkit) with a selection marker<br> |
- | iii. pDummy and pToolkit are co-transformed to a bacterium which is under selection stress< | + | iii. pDummy and pToolkit are co-transformed to a bacterium which is under selection stress. |
- | <br> | + | <br><br> |
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | + | ||
- | <b>1. | + | Three possible outcomes could be expected:<br> |
- | + | ||
+ | <b>1. Only pDummy is uptaken</b><br> | ||
+ | Since pDummy has no selection marker, the host bacterium would die under selection pressure and fail to propagate. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
<b>2. only pToolkit is uptaken</b><br> | <b>2. only pToolkit is uptaken</b><br> | ||
- | + | The host bacterium that uptakes pToolkit survives. During its propagation, however, the pToolkit is not replicated because protein products of G are absent. Therefore, daughter cells of the host bacterium would not receive copies of the pToolkit and die under selection pressure. | |
- | + | <br><br> | |
- | + | ||
+ | <b>3. Both pDummy and pToolkit are uptaken</b><br> | ||
+ | In the presence of pDummy, pToolkit would be maintained and confer resistance to selection pressure on the host bacterium. Daughter cells that receive copies of both plasmids would survive and eventually form a colony. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | <p> | + | </p> |
- | + | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Owing to this mutualistic relation, retention of the desired pDummy would be possible once the host bacterium develops an addiction it, while pToolkit can be lost in bacterial propagation if the expression of G can be shut off manually. Eventually, the bacteria would not obtain any new antibiotic resistance genes but keep pDummy. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | <p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b>2.2 Development of addiction – use of the λ RED recombination system [1]</b><br> |
- | + | Performed with a purpose to induce host bacterium’s addiction to the pDummy, removal of the essential gene <i>nadE</i> from the bacterial genomic DNA is mediated by the phage λ RED recombination system. | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | + | [Nat is still writing...z.z] | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | + | The λ RED recombination cassette is located in our third plasmid “Toolkit”. Upon successful co-transformation of pDummy and pToolkit, loss of genomic essential gene can be stimulated by introducing- into the bacterial cell- linear dsDNA molecules carrying a reporter gene flanked by sequences homologous to those of the essential gene. An expected outcome of this introduction is the swapping out of the <i>nadE</i> gene with the reporter gene. | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | + | Since the linear dsDNAs do not have origin of replications, they would not be inherited in daughters unless the swapping has taken place properly. Thus any observable signals from the reporter would allow identification of successful recombination. Once the recombination is completed, the toolkit plasmid and the cell’s antibiotic resistance gene can be eliminated from the host bacterium, giving us the completed strain of E. CRAFT. | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | |||
- | + | <b>2.3 Complementation between reporter genes – manifesting completion of E. CRAFT engineering</b> | |
+ | <br> | ||
- | + | To ensure that the final strain of E. CRAFT has: | |
+ | <br> | ||
- | + | (1) successfully had its essential nadE gene deleted from the genome; | |
+ | <br> | ||
- | + | (2) maintained the pDummy, a complementation reporter system between the pDummy and swapped gene is preferred over a single reporter at the swap site. | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Different methods can be employed to achieve this aim: | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | i. α complementation can be used in <i>E. coli</i> strains which have had their lacZ gene completely removed. The larger fragment ω can be swapped in place for the essential gene while the smaller α fragment can stay on pDummy. In an X-gal rich medium, blue colonies would indicate the desired engineered strains. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ii. Complementation between split fluorescent proteins (sFP). 2010 iGEM Slovenia team has demonstrated the principle that N-terminal and C-terminal fragments of sFPS are able to complement in vivo, and two sets of sfFPS are able to undergo Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET). Using this system has been considered in this project, but an alternative reporter candidate, the split superfolder GFPs (sfGFP) [6, 12, 13] invented by other researchers, was tested instead. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | <p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px"> | ||
- | <b> | + | |
+ | <b>2.4 Summary of construction flow:</b><br> | ||
+ | |||
1. Assembly pDummy and pToolkit<br> | 1. Assembly pDummy and pToolkit<br> | ||
- | 2. Co- | + | 2. Co-transformation of both plasmids into <i>E. coli</i> and maintenance of stable strains<br> |
- | 3. | + | 3. Introduction of linear ds DNAs and induction of recombination<br> |
- | 4. | + | 4. Isolation of recombinants<br> |
- | 5. | + | 5. Induction pToolkit loss |
<a href=#top>[Top]</a> | <a href=#top>[Top]</a> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<p > | <p > | ||
<h4 align=left><a name=component></a>4. Details of the components – a closer look to the molecular basis of assembly</h4> | <h4 align=left><a name=component></a>4. Details of the components – a closer look to the molecular basis of assembly</h4> |
Revision as of 14:01, 5 October 2011
Strain Construction
1. Constructing EX – the bacterial strain that allows selection without use of antibiotics
To study the population dynamics and behavior of a certain antibiotics sensitive strain of E. coli in a medium of antibiotic, our E. trojan that is introduced into the culture medium must not process a wide spectrum of antibiotic resistance that impose a selective advantage. At the same time, E. trojan needs to be transformed with the T4MO gene to carry out its job of signal disruption.
1. How to select against E. CRAFT cells that fail to take up the vector plasmid? Our alternative selection method
Our E. CRAFT (Escherichia coli Re-engineered for Antibiotics-Free Transformation) is designed to have one of its essential genes (genes that are required for viability) removed from its genome, and relocated into an engineered plasmid “Dummy”. This would result in E. CRAFT’s dependency on this extra- chromosomal copy of the essential gene for survival, and hence the addiction to the pDummy. By having direct control over the replication of pDummy, we dictate the life and death of E. CRAFT (and hence the name pDummy).
2. Stepping into the heart of construction - methods of assembly
2.1 Construction and maintenance of an antibiotic-resistance-gene-free plasmid through antibiotic selection – the unavoidable evil two plasmid system
Let’s consider the following scenario:
Three possible outcomes could be expected: Owing to this mutualistic relation, retention of the desired pDummy would be possible once the host bacterium develops an addiction it, while pToolkit can be lost in bacterial propagation if the expression of G can be shut off manually. Eventually, the bacteria would not obtain any new antibiotic resistance genes but keep pDummy.
2.2 Development of addiction – use of the λ RED recombination system [1]
2.4 Summary of construction flow:
4. Details of the components – a closer look to the molecular basis of assembly
4.1 Temperature-sensitive origin of replication_oriR101 & repA101-ts (BBa_K524000)
4.2 split superfolder green fluroscent protein_split sfGFP
4.3 Essential gene nadE (BBa_K524003)
4.4 Replication initiator pi protein encoded by pir gene (BBa_K524004) and ori-gamma from R6K plasmid
4.5 iGEM 2010 Slovenia Split/FRET constructs |
Strain Construction1. Constructing EX 2. How to Select? 3. Methods of Assembly 4. Component Details |
---|---|
|
|
|