"
Team:Glasgow/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
HannahRalph (Talk | contribs) (→Safety) |
EmmaCampbell (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | {| style="color:#33cc33;background-color:#FFFFFF;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" border="2" bordercolor="#fff" width="100%" align="center" | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow|Home]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/Team|Team]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/iGEM_Diary|iGEM Diary]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2011&team_name=Glasgow Official Team Profile] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/Project|Project]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/Parts|Parts Submitted to the Registry]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/Modeling|Modeling]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/Gallery|Gallery]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/Safety|Safety]] | |
| - | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Glasgow/Attributions|Attributions]] | |
| - | + | |} | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| Line 33: | Line 28: | ||
<!--- The Mission, Experiments ---> | <!--- The Mission, Experiments ---> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
Revision as of 12:06, 29 June 2011
| Home | Team | iGEM Diary | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Gallery | Safety | Attributions |
|---|
| You can write a background of your team here. Give us a background of your team, the members, etc. Or tell us more about something of your choosing. |  |
|
Tell us more about your project. Give us background. Use this is the abstract of your project. Be descriptive but concise (1-2 paragraphs) | File:Glasgow team.png Your team picture |
| Team Example |
Safety
Please use this page to answer the safety questions posed on the safety page. (Questions below)
1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?
2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?
3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
