Team:ETH Zurich/Process/Microfluidics
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{|class="processTitle linkMap" align="right" | {|class="processTitle linkMap" align="right" | ||
|- | |- | ||
- | |style="border-left: none;"|[[#Initial Channel Designs| | + | |style="border-left: none;"|[[#Initial Channel Designs|Initial Channel Designs]] |
|[[#Final Channel Design|Final Channel Design]] | |[[#Final Channel Design|Final Channel Design]] | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 01:43, 22 September 2011
Microfluidics |
| ||
We relatively early figured out that we need some kind of channel to establish the acetaldehyde or xylene gradient required for SmoColi (see Circuit Design). However, there were several different possible channel designs, and the final design evolved through an iterative series of design steps and design validations. The first designs were validated based on vast simulations, the final design furthermore by biological experiments in the lab (see Systems Validation). |
Initial Channel DesignsMicrofluidic channel with flow and recycling of the mediumWe came up with two different possible microfluidic channel designs, both involving a flow of toxic molecule in medium through the channel:
|
Final Channel DesignMicrofluidic channel without flow
|