|
|
Line 104: |
Line 104: |
| <br> | | <br> |
| <a name="pJEJAM1"></a><h2>pJEJAM1</h2> | | <a name="pJEJAM1"></a><h2>pJEJAM1</h2> |
- | weflijwe weoprjwperj n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days
| + | U-2 OS cells transiently transfected with pJEJAM1 expressing GFP. |
| <br> | | <br> |
| <br> | | <br> |
Line 121: |
Line 121: |
| </tr> | | </tr> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
- | <td>U-2 OS cells expressing plasmid pJEJAM1 </td> | + | <td>U-2 OS cells transiently transfected with plasmid pJEJAM1 expressing GFP. Cells were fixed using 4% formaldehyde and addition of Vectashield. Imaging was performed with a confocal microscope, the white bar has a length of 20μm objective. </td> |
- | <td>U-2 OS cells expressing plasmid pJEJAM1</td> | + | <td>U-2 OS cells transiently transfected with plasmid pJEJAM1 expressing GFP. Cells were fixed using 4% formaldehyde and addition of Vectashield. Imaging was performed with a confocal microscope, the white bar has a length of 20μm objective. </td> |
| </tr> | | </tr> |
| </table> | | </table> |
|
|
Why mammalian cells?
The potential in biopharmaceuticals produced by mammalian cells is huge (1). Last year the global biopharmaceutical market in 2015 was expected to increase to US$ 167 billion (2). Biopharmaceuticals target diseases such as psoriasis and cancer and are more convenient, safe and effective than the other treatment solutions on the market (3). Compared to microbes mammalian cells have lower yields, are more difficult to handle in the laboratory, are costly and have a slow doubling time. So why use mammalian cells, when microbes such as yeast and E. coli are already used as fast, efficient, and cheap cell factories?
The main and most important answer to this is post-translational modifications (PTMs) (4). The reasons for the importance of the PTMs are the protein stability, ligand binding, and potential result in increased immunogenicity when used for humans (4). Most of the therapeutic proteins approved and currently in development are post-translationally modified, which is not surprising since approximately 50% of human proteins are glycosylated (5,5).
With this kept in mind there are some key issues in manufacturing where speed in development plays a prominent role; cell line creation has to be completed as rapidly as possible. To reduce the timelines for cell line creation the Plug’n’Play with DNA assembly standard could be a valuable tool.
It is not only in the industry a more efficient high throughput cloning system could be valuable, when it comes to constructing DNA libraries from extremely complex DNA populations such as total human genomic DNA the application of the Plug'n'Play standard could reduce the construction time with several weeks.
To demonstrate how fast any vector of choice for the expression in mammalian cells can be assembled we chose to design a reporter system as proof of concept. This system comprises a backbone plasmid that allows for the amplification in and selection of E. coli, the strong constitutive promoter CMV, a gene module consisting of a gene encoding a fluorescent protein or a gene encoding a fluorescent protein and a localization signal, the BGH terminator and the hygromycin marker cassette. This reporter system can easily be modified and used for gene expression studies. Furthermore we designed a vector for localization of GFP to the peroxisomes, which for instance could be used to monitor movement and metabolism. The idea is to develop this reporter system so that proteins can be localized to organelles and other subcellular compartments allowing for the study of organelles in real time. We lastly showed that cells can be transfected with different fluorescent proteins which with a further development of the system would allow labeling with different fluorescent proteins.
pJEJAM1
U-2 OS cells transiently transfected with pJEJAM1 expressing GFP.
|
|
U-2 OS cells transiently transfected with plasmid pJEJAM1 expressing GFP. Cells were fixed using 4% formaldehyde and addition of Vectashield. Imaging was performed with a confocal microscope, the white bar has a length of 20μm objective. |
U-2 OS cells transiently transfected with plasmid pJEJAM1 expressing GFP. Cells were fixed using 4% formaldehyde and addition of Vectashield. Imaging was performed with a confocal microscope, the white bar has a length of 20μm objective. |
pJEJAM2
n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days
|
|
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmid pJEJAM2 |
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmids pJEJAM2 and pJEJAM5 |
pJEJAM3
n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days
|
|
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmid pJEJAM3 |
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmids pJEJAM3 |
pJEJAM4
n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days
|
|
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmid pJEJAM4 |
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmids pJEJAM4 |
pJEJAM5
n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days n total we spent blabla days on constructing, blabla days on transfecting and went from design to result in blabla days
|
|
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmid pJEJAM5 |
U-2 OS cells expressing plasmids pJEJAM5 |
(1) Hesse, F., Wagner, R. (2000). Developments and improvements in the manufacturing of human therapeutics with mammalian cell cultures. TIBTECH, 18, 173-180.
(2) Global Biopharmaceutical Market Report (2010-2015). (2010). The International Market Analysis Research and Consulting Group.
(3) Xie, L., Zhou, W., Robinson, D. (2003). Protein production by large-scale mammalian cell culture. S.C. Makrides (Ed.) Gene Transfer and Expression in Mammalian Cells. Elsevier Science B.V.
(4) Browne, SM., Al-Rubeai, M. (2007). Selection methods for high-producing mammalian cell lines. TRENDS in Biotechnology, 25, 425-432.
(5) Walsh, W., Jefferis, R. (2006). Post-translational modifications in the context of therapeutic proteins. Nature Biotechnology, 24, 1241-1252.
|