Team:Berkeley/Judging
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
<b> ✔ 2. Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system</b><br> | <b> ✔ 2. Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system</b><br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | We worked closely with the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:BU_Wellesley_Software">Boston University/Wellesley Software team</a> to evaluate and improve their Clotho software. Our team worked extensively with their latest build and dashboard, identifying bugs and making suggestions to improve the user experience. A list of our team's contributions to the BU/Wellesley effort can be found here.<br> | + | We worked closely with the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:BU_Wellesley_Software">Boston University/Wellesley Software team</a> to evaluate and improve their Clotho software. Our team worked extensively with their latest build and dashboard, identifying bugs and making suggestions to improve the user experience. A list of our team's contributions to the BU/Wellesley effort can be found <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Berkeley/BUWsoftware">here</a>.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<b> ☐ 3. Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.</b><br></div> | <b> ☐ 3. Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.</b><br></div> |
Revision as of 00:26, 10 September 2011
Judging
Bronze:
✔ 1. Team registrationRegistered Teams
✔ 2. Complete Project Summary form
Our project is summarized on our wiki's front page and a preliminary description was sent to iGEM earlier in the summer.
✔ 3. Team Wiki
Berkeley's Wiki Home
✔ 4. Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
✔ 5. At least one new submitted and well-characterized standard BioBrick Part or Device or new application and outstanding documentation of a previously existing BioBrick part in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry.
BBa_K641009: P_rffGH.rbs.ToxR-Nhe1.{gsgsgs}{LambdaRep}
BBa_K641008: {Pctx}{rbs.ffGFP}
EXPLAIN
Silver (in addition to the Bronze requirements):
✔ 1. Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expectedEXPLAIN
✔ 2. Characterize the operation of at least one new BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
EXPLAIN
Gold (in addition to the Bronze and Silver Medal requirements, any one or more of the following):
✔ 1. Improve an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry).With BBa_K641009, we are providing a functioning alternative to BBa_J07009 with characterization. The DNA in the Registry for the BBa_J07009 was inconsistent with the expected sequence, and no functional characterization was provided.
✔ 2. Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system
We worked closely with the Boston University/Wellesley Software team to evaluate and improve their Clotho software. Our team worked extensively with their latest build and dashboard, identifying bugs and making suggestions to improve the user experience. A list of our team's contributions to the BU/Wellesley effort can be found here.
☐ 3. Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.