Team:Wageningen UR/Safety/Four
From 2011.igem.org
(→Biosafety and biosecurity considerations) |
(→Biosafety and biosecurity considerations) |
||
(One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
=== Risks and benefits === | === Risks and benefits === | ||
- | Under Good Microbiological Practices the risk of working with the BioBrick system is rather small to the | + | Under Good Microbiological Practices the risk of working with the BioBrick system is rather small to the researcher. If the system was to be released into the surroundings, there is a low risk that it would enter a pathogenic host organism that relies on quorum sensing for its pathogenicity. |
- | + | However, the potential effects have not yet been studied, so unforeseen hazards might turn up. Regarding the benefits, it is our opinion that a robust biological oscillator that could be integrated into more complex genetic circuits would be of great utility for more advanced synthetic biology applications; particularly related to cell synchronization. One could also envision the oscillator as a core component of a system sequentially performing highly specific enzymatic reactions. | |
Based on these considerations, we conclude that the potential benefits in successfully executing our project outweighs the estimated risks. | Based on these considerations, we conclude that the potential benefits in successfully executing our project outweighs the estimated risks. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 20:52, 21 September 2011