Team:NTNU Trondheim/Stress Sensor

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Stress sensor (rrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry))
(→Stress sensor characterization)
 
(18 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
-
== Stress sensor (rrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry) ==
+
== Stress Sensor (rrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry) ==
[[File:rrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry_rosa.png|780px]]
[[File:rrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry_rosa.png|780px]]
Line 14: Line 14:
!Biobrick
!Biobrick
!Part number
!Part number
 +
|-
 +
|rrnB P1
 +
|BBa_K639002
|-
|-
|LacI with RBS
|LacI with RBS
Line 29: Line 32:
The promotor is a variant of BBa_K112118, that we have made ourselves using PCR, and the PCR product was directly used as insert and connected with the rest of the construct. The final construct was cut with BstBI to verify that the rrnB P1 had been insertet.  
The promotor is a variant of BBa_K112118, that we have made ourselves using PCR, and the PCR product was directly used as insert and connected with the rest of the construct. The final construct was cut with BstBI to verify that the rrnB P1 had been insertet.  
-
The stress sensor has a total length of 2653 bp, and is located inside the plasmid pSB1A2, carrying ampicillin resistance.
+
The stress sensor has a total length of 2653 bp. It was originally constructed and tested in the pSB1A2 plasmid but transfered to the pSB1C3 plasmid prior to shipping to the registry
We have put the stress sensor through several tests (see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim/stress-sensor characterization])
We have put the stress sensor through several tests (see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim/stress-sensor characterization])
 +
'''Link to parts registry:''' [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K639003 BBa_K639003]
 +
 +
==Stress sensor characterization==
 +
 +
 +
To test our [https://2011.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim/rrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry stress sensor], pre-cultures of the construct with, and without the rrnB P1 promoter were grown ON, pelleted and resuspended in M9 medium. The cultures were inoculated 1% in LB, LB+IPTG, M9 and M9+IPTG. IPTG will induce pLac, by inhibiting lacI's inhibition. M9 is a minimal medium, lacking amino-acids. M9 was used because ppGpp is mainly produced in the stringent response during amino-acid starvation.
 +
 +
 +
Cultures were grown in flasks in a shaking incubator at 37C for 3,5 hours, and 3 parallels of 100 µL from each flask were sampled to a 96 well fluorometer plate. Fluorescence was measured at ex: 584 em: 620, as well as OD600. Data from the experiment is shown in figure 1, as fluorescence divided by OD600.
 +
 +
 +
[[File:Stress-sensorBOTH.jpg]]
 +
 +
Figure 1. ''Shows Fluorescence at ex: 584 em: 620 diveded by OD600 for cultures grown 3,5 hour in LB and M9 with and without IPTG''.
 +
 +
 +
As shown in figure 1, the cells do produce a substantial amount of mCherry even when they are not stressed (LB, and LB+IPTG). This is possibly due to the rrnB P1 promoter not being strong enough to produce sufficient amounts of lacI to inhibit pLac's expression of mCherry.
 +
 +
Looking at the difference between samples with (+P) and without promoter (-P) in LB and LB+IPTG, it is clear that the rrnB P1 promoter does produce lacI. The fluorescence/OD value of +P in LB is lower than -P in LB, indicating production of lacI. When it is induced by IPTG, inhibiting lacI, the level rises to approximately the same as -P, indicating a nullifying effect of the lacI produced.
 +
 +
The fluorescence / OD of the M9 samples is much higher than the LB. This was due to the slow growth rate in M9. The OD600 was unchanged from the inital OD in all M9 parallels after 3,5 hours (data not shown). What is interesting here, is that the difference between +P and -P seems to be gone. This indicates that the rrnB P1 promoter does indeed produce less lacI when the cells are grown in M9, possibly due to amino-acid starvation and ppGpp shutting it down.
 +
As the data was quite variable, this is hard to say for sure.
 +
 +
 +
In future work with this construct, one could try to increase rrnB P1's strength by maybe tweaking the UTR, or try to lower pLac's strength, to give less leakage. A combination of both strategies would probably give the best result.
 +
 +
 +
'''Sequencing'''
 +
 +
 +
The BioBrick's sequence was confirmed by sequencing of the plasmid containing it. A map of the alignment of the sequencing fragments to the BioBrick's sequence is shown below. All bases were checked in detail. Prefix and suffix sequences were also correct, but are not shown in the map.
 +
 +
 +
[[File:Brick+P.jpg]]
 +
 +
==Flow Cytometry==
 +
Several measurements were performed using a Flow Cytometer, this allowed us to measure the flouresence from single cells. The resulting plots shows the distributions of the flouresence for the red end of the spectrum (i.e around the wavelength corresponding to mCherry).
 +
 +
[[File:+P.png|380x340px]] [[File:-P.png|380x340px]]
 +
[[File:+IPTG.png|380x340px]] [[File:-IPTG.png|380x340px]]
 +
 +
Figure 2:''Flow Cytometry measurements for cultures grown in M9 and LB medium ''
 +
 +
First of all there is a remarkable difference between the distributions for M9 and LB. The distribution for LB is relatively sharp compared to M9 which means there is little difference in the level of light emitted from the individual cells. The distribution for M9 is much broader showing a greater variance and it is also shifted to the right. A distribution shifted to the right means stronger emission of red light. 
 +
 +
[[File:M9.png|380x340px]]
 +
 +
Figure 3:''Comparison between cultures grown on M9 medium''
{{:Team:NTNU_Trondheim/NTNU_footer}}
{{:Team:NTNU_Trondheim/NTNU_footer}}

Latest revision as of 07:48, 21 September 2011



Stress Sensor (rrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry)

RrnB+LacI+pLac+mCherry rosa.png


The stress sensor is our main construct. It is made from the following biobricks:

Plasmid map of the complete construct. Promoters are shown in blue, and genes as inside arrows. Only single restriction sites are shown.
Biobrick Part number
rrnB P1 BBa_K639002
LacI with RBS BBa_J24679
Terminator BBa_B0015
pLac BBa_R0011
mCherry with RBS and terminator BBa_J06702

The promotor is a variant of BBa_K112118, that we have made ourselves using PCR, and the PCR product was directly used as insert and connected with the rest of the construct. The final construct was cut with BstBI to verify that the rrnB P1 had been insertet. The stress sensor has a total length of 2653 bp. It was originally constructed and tested in the pSB1A2 plasmid but transfered to the pSB1C3 plasmid prior to shipping to the registry We have put the stress sensor through several tests (see characterization)

Link to parts registry: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K639003 BBa_K639003]

Stress sensor characterization

To test our stress sensor, pre-cultures of the construct with, and without the rrnB P1 promoter were grown ON, pelleted and resuspended in M9 medium. The cultures were inoculated 1% in LB, LB+IPTG, M9 and M9+IPTG. IPTG will induce pLac, by inhibiting lacI's inhibition. M9 is a minimal medium, lacking amino-acids. M9 was used because ppGpp is mainly produced in the stringent response during amino-acid starvation.


Cultures were grown in flasks in a shaking incubator at 37C for 3,5 hours, and 3 parallels of 100 µL from each flask were sampled to a 96 well fluorometer plate. Fluorescence was measured at ex: 584 em: 620, as well as OD600. Data from the experiment is shown in figure 1, as fluorescence divided by OD600.


Stress-sensorBOTH.jpg

Figure 1. Shows Fluorescence at ex: 584 em: 620 diveded by OD600 for cultures grown 3,5 hour in LB and M9 with and without IPTG.


As shown in figure 1, the cells do produce a substantial amount of mCherry even when they are not stressed (LB, and LB+IPTG). This is possibly due to the rrnB P1 promoter not being strong enough to produce sufficient amounts of lacI to inhibit pLac's expression of mCherry.

Looking at the difference between samples with (+P) and without promoter (-P) in LB and LB+IPTG, it is clear that the rrnB P1 promoter does produce lacI. The fluorescence/OD value of +P in LB is lower than -P in LB, indicating production of lacI. When it is induced by IPTG, inhibiting lacI, the level rises to approximately the same as -P, indicating a nullifying effect of the lacI produced.

The fluorescence / OD of the M9 samples is much higher than the LB. This was due to the slow growth rate in M9. The OD600 was unchanged from the inital OD in all M9 parallels after 3,5 hours (data not shown). What is interesting here, is that the difference between +P and -P seems to be gone. This indicates that the rrnB P1 promoter does indeed produce less lacI when the cells are grown in M9, possibly due to amino-acid starvation and ppGpp shutting it down. As the data was quite variable, this is hard to say for sure.


In future work with this construct, one could try to increase rrnB P1's strength by maybe tweaking the UTR, or try to lower pLac's strength, to give less leakage. A combination of both strategies would probably give the best result.


Sequencing


The BioBrick's sequence was confirmed by sequencing of the plasmid containing it. A map of the alignment of the sequencing fragments to the BioBrick's sequence is shown below. All bases were checked in detail. Prefix and suffix sequences were also correct, but are not shown in the map.


Brick+P.jpg

Flow Cytometry

Several measurements were performed using a Flow Cytometer, this allowed us to measure the flouresence from single cells. The resulting plots shows the distributions of the flouresence for the red end of the spectrum (i.e around the wavelength corresponding to mCherry).

+P.png -P.png +IPTG.png -IPTG.png

Figure 2:Flow Cytometry measurements for cultures grown in M9 and LB medium

First of all there is a remarkable difference between the distributions for M9 and LB. The distribution for LB is relatively sharp compared to M9 which means there is little difference in the level of light emitted from the individual cells. The distribution for M9 is much broader showing a greater variance and it is also shifted to the right. A distribution shifted to the right means stronger emission of red light.

M9.png

Figure 3:Comparison between cultures grown on M9 medium

Retrieved from "http://2011.igem.org/Team:NTNU_Trondheim/Stress_Sensor"