Team:Harvard/Template:NotebookDataJuly2

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Isothermal Assembly)
(Team ZF)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 147: Line 147:
===Team ZF===
===Team ZF===
====PCR to check for omega+zif268====
====PCR to check for omega+zif268====
-
All colonies that grew on the plates we left overnight should have spec-resistance, but they may not have the omega and zif268 unit that we inserted [[#Isothermal Assembly|yesterday]] with isothermal assembly. We performed a PCR on 13 colonies picked from the 50 ul plate to find a colony that contains the w+zif268 insertion. We used the same recipe at our PCR reaction [[#PCR of omega+zif268 with overhangs|on Friday]]. If the insert is present, then we should see a band at 709 bp. We also included 2 positive controls: our isothermal assembly product and our selection strain from which the w+zif268 was originally copied.  
+
All colonies that grew on the plates we left overnight should have spec-resistance, but they may not have the omega and zif268 unit that we inserted yesterday with isothermal assembly. We performed a PCR on 13 colonies picked from the 50 ul plate to find a colony that contains the w+zif268 insertion. We used the same recipe at our PCR reaction [[#PCR of omega+zif268 with overhangs on Friday. If the insert is present, then we should see a band at 709 bp. We also included 2 positive controls: our isothermal assembly product and our selection strain from which the w+zif268 was originally copied.  
We ran an agarose gel to check the bands:
We ran an agarose gel to check the bands:
Line 155: Line 155:
|}
|}
-
None of the colonies displayed any bands, except for primer residues. Lane 16 contained the selection plasmid, on which we performed [[#Gel purification of PCR product|a successful PCR]] on Friday, so we definitely expected a band at 709 bp. Because the positive controls did not have a band at 709 bp, we suspect that something went wrong with the PCR. We plan on re-running the PCR tomorrow.</div>
+
None of the colonies displayed any bands, except for primer residues. Lane 16 contained the selection plasmid, on which we performed [https://2011.igem.org/Team:Harvard/Protocols#PCR_purification a successful PCR] on Friday, so we definitely expected a band at 709 bp. Because the positive controls did not have a band at 709 bp, we suspect that something went wrong with the PCR. We plan on re-running the PCR tomorrow.</div>
<div id="711" style="display:none">
<div id="711" style="display:none">
 +
==July 11th==
==July 11th==
===Team ZF===
===Team ZF===
Line 272: Line 273:
===Team Web===
===Team Web===
-
*Design [https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApTl36bX3P7qdFo3SEFXMkNCZ3ZBX1hBQUZqWUpiV2c&pli=1#gid=0 Google Doc]</div>
+
*Looked at good wikis from last year. </div>
<div id="712" style="display:none">
<div id="712" style="display:none">
 +
==July 12th==
==July 12th==
===Team ZF===
===Team ZF===
Line 294: Line 296:
|}
|}
-
Even after the gel purification, our bands were streaky. We decided to redo the PCR, placing all the reactions in single tubes, performing a touchdown PCR instead. Our annealing temperature started at 70*, repeated for 2 cycles, and then decreased 2*, every two cycles, until it reached 58* (the optimal annealing temperature), where it remained until the 25 cycles were complete. We left this PCR going overnight. (See [[#Results of ultramer touchdown PCR|July 13th]] for the gel image.)
+
Even after the gel purification, our bands were streaky. We decided to redo the PCR, placing all the reactions in single tubes, performing a touchdown PCR instead. Our annealing temperature started at 70*, repeated for 2 cycles, and then decreased 2*, every two cycles, until it reached 58* (the optimal annealing temperature), where it remained until the 25 cycles were complete. We left this PCR going overnight. (See July 13th for the gel image.)
====PCR of expression plasmid cross-junction====
====PCR of expression plasmid cross-junction====
-
We also performed a second PCR on colony nine (the colony we decided with which we decided to proceed) to confirm that our omega+zif268 in the spec backbone was successfully inserted into the ''E. coli''. The expected product was the cross-junction on the plasmid, approximately 1.4 kb. We used the same recipe as that used on [[#PCR of omega+zif268 with overhangs|July 9th]], except with a forward primer of PZE23G-3581 F and a reverse primer of PZE23G-2133 R, and had a 55* annealing temperature and an extension time of 45 seconds.  
+
We also performed a second PCR on colony nine (the colony we decided with which we decided to proceed) to confirm that our omega+zif268 in the spec backbone was successfully inserted into the ''E. coli''. The expected product was the cross-junction on the plasmid, approximately 1.4 kb. We used the same recipe as that used on July 9th, except with a forward primer of PZE23G-3581 F and a reverse primer of PZE23G-2133 R, and had a 55* annealing temperature and an extension time of 45 seconds.  
After running an e-gel, we confirmed that our w+zif268 was inserted into the plasmid.
After running an e-gel, we confirmed that our w+zif268 was inserted into the plasmid.

Latest revision as of 18:48, 3 August 2011