Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Sensitivity
From 2011.igem.org
JeanBaptiste (Talk | contribs) |
BouGeo7314 (Talk | contribs) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<div class="body"> | <div class="body"> | ||
- | + | <!-- | |
<img src="http://www.clickartists.org/clicksite/html/images/square.jpg"/> | <img src="http://www.clickartists.org/clicksite/html/images/square.jpg"/> | ||
<h2>JB</h2> | <h2>JB</h2> | ||
- | + | ||
Si vous éditez la page commencez par décommenter ces lignes, publier, PUIS commencer à faire ce que vous avez à faire et quand vous avez fini de publier remettez en commentaire. | Si vous éditez la page commencez par décommenter ces lignes, publier, PUIS commencer à faire ce que vous avez à faire et quand vous avez fini de publier remettez en commentaire. | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<h1>Sensitivity to parameters study</h1> | <h1>Sensitivity to parameters study</h1> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <form method="get" > | ||
+ | <input type="button" value="< PREVIOUS <" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Device';" /> | ||
+ | <select name="id" onchange="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results' + this.options[this.selectedIndex].value ;"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Table of content"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="#Content" >Table of content</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Toggle Switch" > | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/Toggle#TS_QS" >Toggle Switch and Quorum Sensing</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Toggle#Validation" >Validation of the model</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Toggle#Dynamic" >Dynamic study of the stability</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Post-transcriptional regulation (RsmA)"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/rmsA#Necessity">Necessity of this system</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/rmsA#fha">Leader sequence characterization</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/rmsA#rsma">rsmA characterization</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Device"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/Device#Optimization" >Optimization of the device</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Device#Limit">Determination of the limit of quantification</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Device#Statistic">Statistic study of device specificities</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Sensitivity to parameters"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/Sensitivity#Robustness" selected="selected">Robustness of the system</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Sensitivity#Mercury">Applicable to mercury</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </select> | ||
+ | <input type="hidden" name="id2" value="0" /> | ||
+ | <input type="submit" value="Go!" /> | ||
+ | <input type="button" value="> NEXT >" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Sensitivity';" /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </form> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<div class="blocbackground" id="Robustness"> | <div class="blocbackground" id="Robustness"> | ||
Line 210: | Line 276: | ||
<div class="blocbackground" id="Mercury"> | <div class="blocbackground" id="Mercury"> | ||
<h2>Applicable to mercury</h2> | <h2>Applicable to mercury</h2> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | According to the previous study, the following parameters are determinant for system's robustness: | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>$k_{plac}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$k_{ptet}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$K_{pLac-LacI}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$K_{pTet-TetR}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$K_{lacI-IPTG}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$K_{tetR-aTc}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$n_{plac}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$n_{ptet}$</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | By comparing to the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling/Parameters">set of parameters for mercury</a>, | ||
+ | we can observed that the variation of parameters always stay in the stability area: | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>$k_{pmerT}$: the same as pTet</li> | ||
+ | <li>$K_{pmerT-merR}$: 20% of $K_{pTet_TetR}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$K_{merR-Hg{2+}}$: 1000% of $K_{tetR_aTc}$</li> | ||
+ | <li>$n_{pmerT}$: $\approx$ 15% of $n_{pTet}$</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Variations of these parameters will have an influence on the results but value are still reasonnable (variation $\approx$ 200% | ||
+ | of the final results).<br/><br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <strong> | ||
+ | With this set of parameters for mercury, the system should work as well as for aTc. | ||
+ | </strong> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <form method="get" > | ||
+ | <input type="button" value="< PREVIOUS <" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Device';" /> | ||
+ | <select name="id" onchange="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results' + this.options[this.selectedIndex].value ;"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Table of content"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="#Content" >Table of content</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Toggle Switch" > | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/Toggle#TS_QS" >Toggle Switch and Quorum Sensing</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Toggle#Validation" >Validation of the model</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Toggle#Dynamic" >Dynamic study of the stability</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Post-transcriptional regulation (RsmA)"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/rmsA#Necessity">Necessity of this system</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/rmsA#fha">Leader sequence characterization</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/rmsA#rsma">rsmA characterization</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Device"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/Device#Optimization" >Optimization of the device</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Device#Limit">Determination of the limit of quantification</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Device#Statistic">Statistic study of device specificities</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <optgroup label="Sensitivity to parameters"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <option value="/Sensitivity#Robustness" selected="selected">Robustness of the system</option> | ||
+ | <option value="/Sensitivity#Mercury">Applicable to mercury</option> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </optgroup> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </select> | ||
+ | <input type="hidden" name="id2" value="0" /> | ||
+ | <input type="submit" value="Go!" /> | ||
+ | <input type="button" value="> NEXT >" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Sensitivity';" /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </form> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 03:18, 29 October 2011
Sensitivity to parameters study
Robustness of our system
In order to know if an error on the parameters would induce a completely different behaviour of our system, we studied the sensitivity of our system to changes in the parameter values.
This study was performed by increasing or decreasing our parameters values by a range of percentages (from -66% to +300% for each parameter). Then we studied the change on the output of our system, the ratio of IPTG over aTc that induces the coloration.
On the following figure one can see the influence on the output of our system (the ratio of IPTG over aTc on the interface) for several aTc concentrations. For these concentrations the switch is still efficient, even though the resulting variation on the output will induce an error on our measure.
Figure 2: Parameters sensitivity for 6.3e-06 M of aTc
|
Variations from 1 to 13 :
|
For low values of aTc concentration the error is too minor to perturb the mechanism of our system. However, it becomes impossible to predict the system output if the error is superior to -50% or +100% for parameters such as KpLac - LacI or KpTet - TetR. In such a case a characterization of the responsible parameter would be necessary.
For higher aTc concentrations however, the level of IPTG at which the switch occurs is very high. Errors on the parameters prevents the system to switch for the chosen IPTG gradient. In this case, the IPTG maximal necessary valuefor quantification would be too high for a living cell. The only problem being a decrease of the maximum value we can quantify.
Applicable to mercury
According to the previous study, the following parameters are determinant for system's robustness:
- $k_{plac}$
- $k_{ptet}$
- $K_{pLac-LacI}$
- $K_{pTet-TetR}$
- $K_{lacI-IPTG}$
- $K_{tetR-aTc}$
- $n_{plac}$
- $n_{ptet}$
- $k_{pmerT}$: the same as pTet
- $K_{pmerT-merR}$: 20% of $K_{pTet_TetR}$
- $K_{merR-Hg{2+}}$: 1000% of $K_{tetR_aTc}$
- $n_{pmerT}$: $\approx$ 15% of $n_{pTet}$
With this set of parameters for mercury, the system should work as well as for aTc.