Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling/Deterministic

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(12 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<html>
<html>
 +
 +
<!--
 +
<img src="http://www.clickartists.org/clicksite/html/images/square.jpg"/>
 +
<h2>JB</h2>
 +
 +
 +
<!--
 +
Si vous éditez la page commencez par décommenter ces lignes, publier, PUIS commencer à faire ce que vous avez à faire et quand vous avez fini de publier remettez en commentaire.
 +
 +
Ne laissez pas le carré trop longtemps si vous n'éditez pas, chaque fois reprenez ce qui est sur internet plutôt que ce que vous avez sur votre PC
 +
ps: dans Geany selectionner une ou plusieurs lignes et appuyer sur "Ctrl + E" pour commenter ou décommenter
 +
-->
<div class="body">
<div class="body">
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<form method="get" >
 +
  <input type="button" value="< PREVIOUS <" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling';" />
 +
  <select name="id" onchange="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling' + this.options[this.selectedIndex].value ;">
 +
 +
    <optgroup label="Modelling Homepage">
 +
   
 +
    <option value="#Content" >Table of content</option>
 +
 +
    </optgroup>
 +
 +
    <optgroup label="Construction of the model" >
 +
                               
 +
                                    <option value="/Deterministic#Our_EquationsTS" selected="selected">Establishment of the equation - Toggle switch</option>
 +
 +
                                    <option value="/Deterministic#Our_EquationsQS" >Establishment of the equation - Quorum sensing</option>
 +
                               
 +
                                    <option value="/Deterministic#Our_algorithms" >Our algorithms</option>
 +
                               
 +
                                   
 +
                            </optgroup>
 +
                       
 +
                            <optgroup label="Stochastic Modelling">
 +
                               
 +
                                    <option value="/Stochastic#Geof">Sensitivity to noise</option>
 +
                               
 +
                                    <option value="/Stochastic#Gillespie_algorithm">Gillespie algorithm</option>
 +
                               
 +
                                    <option value="/Stochastic#Stats">Mean, standard deviation and stats</option>
 +
 +
                            </optgroup>
 +
 +
                            <optgroup label="Parameters">
 +
                           
 +
    <option value="/Parameters">Table of parameters</option>
 +
 +
    </optgroup>
 +
                    </select>
 +
                    <input type="hidden" name="id2" value="0" />
 +
                    <input type="submit" value="Go!" />
 +
  <input type="button" value="> NEXT >" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling/Stochastic';" />
 +
               
 +
            </form>
 +
            </center>
 +
 +
<div class="left">
<div class="left">
Line 13: Line 75:
    <h1>Construction of the model</h1>
    <h1>Construction of the model</h1>
     
     
-
      <a href="http://2011.iGEM.org/wiki/images/d/d1/Rapport_Equations.pdf">
+
      <a href="http://2011..org/wiki/images/d/d1/Rapport_Equations.pdf">
      <img src="http://2011.iGEM.org/wiki/skins/common/images/icons/fileicon-pdf.png" style="float: left; height: 20px; width: auto">
      <img src="http://2011.iGEM.org/wiki/skins/common/images/icons/fileicon-pdf.png" style="float: left; height: 20px; width: auto">
      PDF version of the next two sections (Equations for Toggle Switch and Quorum sensing)</a><br/>
      PDF version of the next two sections (Equations for Toggle Switch and Quorum sensing)</a><br/>
 +
<!--
      <div class="noindent"><p>You need MathML supported on your browser to read the equations on this page. However,
      <div class="noindent"><p>You need MathML supported on your browser to read the equations on this page. However,
      you can find these equations in the above PDF version.</p>
      you can find these equations in the above PDF version.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
 +
-->
       
       
<p> As a proof of concept, we will consider anhydrotetracycline (aTc) instead of Mercury in
<p> As a proof of concept, we will consider anhydrotetracycline (aTc) instead of Mercury in
Line 35: Line 99:
    </div>
    </div>
<div  class="blocbackground" id="Two_level">
<div  class="blocbackground" id="Two_level">
-
                   <h2>The Two levels of Modelling</h2>
+
                   <h2>The Two modules of Modelling</h2>
<p>
<p>
-
Our system is divided in two independant system:
+
Large-scale biochemical networks are classically decomposed into modules of smaller size to facilitate
 +
the model building process and the model calibration. The approach consists in modelling each module
 +
separately and integrating the different models into a larger model of the whole system.
 +
Like divided our genetic network in severals part (see <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Design">genetic network</a>),
 +
we also divided our model in two independant level of modelling:
<ul>
<ul>
-
                               <li><strong>Toggle Switch modelling:</strong> To predict in which states bacteria will be on the plate.</li>
+
                               <li><strong>The Toggle Switch module:</strong> modelling this network module allows to predict in  
-
                               <li><strong>Quorum Sensing and Coloration:</strong> To predict where the red line will appear on our device.</li>
+
                              which state the bacteria are. In particular, we can determine the switching conditions in bacteria
 +
                              and the localization of the switching area on the device (that depend on both IPTG and aTc
 +
                                concentrations). This gives indications on how to adjust the size of the device to improve the
 +
                                aTc detection.</li>
 +
                               <li><strong>The Quorum Sensing and Coloration module:</strong>the corresponding model is used to
 +
                              predict the localization and the width of the red line on the device. The modelling results are
 +
                              used to improve the device precision, for instance, by choosing between a device with a continuous
 +
                              bacterial layer and a device with strips containing bacteria. Each strip has the same concentration
 +
                              of aTc, but a different IPTG concentration.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</p>
</p>
<p>
<p>
The first level of the model will allow us to define the switch conditions in bacteria, depending
The first level of the model will allow us to define the switch conditions in bacteria, depending
-
on the concentrations of pollutant and IPTG. From these results, we could see where the switch
+
on the concentrations of aTc and IPTG. From these results, we could see where the switch
zone will appear on the device and therefore, the position of the red line. These parts of the
zone will appear on the device and therefore, the position of the red line. These parts of the
-
results indicate the range of mercury that can be detected.
+
results indicate the range of aTc that can be detected.
</p>
</p>
<p>
<p>
-
The second level will provide us with the red line width, an indicator of the system precision.
+
The second level will give us an estimation of the red line width, which indicates the system precision.
-
From these results, we could improve the precision of our device, for instance, by choosing
+
Based on these results, we could improve the precision of our device, for instance, by comparing
between a device with a continuous bacterial layer and a device with strips containing bacteria.
between a device with a continuous bacterial layer and a device with strips containing bacteria.
Each strip has a different IPTG concentration, but the same concentration of Mercury.
Each strip has a different IPTG concentration, but the same concentration of Mercury.
</p>
</p>
-
<p><strong>Two independent levels of modelling which are coupled in order to get a global simulation of
+
<p><strong>Two independent levels of modelling which are coupled in order to get a
-
the device.</strong></p>
+
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Toggle#TS_QS">global simulation of the device.</a>
 +
</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
<div  class="blocbackground" id="Our_EquationsTS">
<div  class="blocbackground" id="Our_EquationsTS">
     <h2>Establishment of the equation</h2>
     <h2>Establishment of the equation</h2>
  <h3>Toggle switch</h3>
  <h3>Toggle switch</h3>
-
<p>In a first part, we define a model to caracterize the Toggle Switch part of our genetic network.
+
<p>In a first part, we define a model to caracterize the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Design/toggle">Toggle Switch module</a> of our genetic network.
-
In order to get the state of the bacteria, we need to compute the concentration of both
+
<br/></p>
-
repressors. To obtain these variation, we set up the system of differential equations which governs
+
-
the behavior of the Toggle Switch.<br/></p>
+
    <ol>
    <ol>
-
      <li>Biological Models</li>
+
      <li>Biological Model</li>
      <p>
      <p>
  A toggle switch consists of two genes, each coding for a protein
  A toggle switch consists of two genes, each coding for a protein
Line 79: Line 154:
      <p>
      <p>
  The biological system we are trying to implement is more complex,
  The biological system we are trying to implement is more complex,
-
  on both the biological and physical side. However, the toggle
+
  on both the biological and physical side. However, the toggle switch
-
  switch model is basically the same. In the study of the toggle
+
  model is basically the same. In the study of the toggle switch itself,
-
  switch itself, the system can be reduced to a simple two-state
+
  the system can be reduced to a simple two-state subsystem that we will
-
  subsystem that we will then use for the rest of our modelling. The
+
  then use for the rest of our modelling. However, our toggle switch model
 +
  is basically the same: we can reduce it to a simple two-state subsystem  
 +
  that we will then use for the rest of our modelling. The
  toggle switch itself is not influenced by the rest of the system,
  toggle switch itself is not influenced by the rest of the system,
  if we do not consider the RsmA regulatory system that will be
  if we do not consider the RsmA regulatory system that will be
Line 90: Line 167:
      </p>
      </p>
-
      <li>Mathematical Models</li>
+
      <li>Mathematical Model</li>
      <p>
      <p>
-
In a first part, we define a model to caracterize the Toggle Switch part of our genetic network.
 
In order to get the state of the bacteria, we need to compute the concentration of both
In order to get the state of the bacteria, we need to compute the concentration of both
-
repressors. To obtain these variation, we set up the system of differential equations which governs
+
repressors. To obtain these variations, we develop a system of ordinary differential equations (ODES)
-
the behavior of the Toggle Switch.
+
which governs the behavior of the Toggle Switch.
      </p>
      </p>
      <center>
      <center>
      $        
      $        
      \frac{d[TetR]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}}{1 +  (\frac{[lacI]}{K_{pLac} + \frac{K_{pLac}.[IPTG]}{K_{lacI-IPTG}}.})^\beta} - \delta_{TetR}.[TetR]$
      \frac{d[TetR]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}}{1 +  (\frac{[lacI]}{K_{pLac} + \frac{K_{pLac}.[IPTG]}{K_{lacI-IPTG}}.})^\beta} - \delta_{TetR}.[TetR]$
-
      <br/>
+
      <br/><br/>
      $\frac{d[lacI]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pTet}.[pTet]_{tot}}{1 +  (\frac{[tetR]}{K_{pTet} + \frac{K_{pTet}.[aTc]}{K_{TetR-aTc}}.})^\gamma} - \delta_{lacI}.[lacI]$
      $\frac{d[lacI]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pTet}.[pTet]_{tot}}{1 +  (\frac{[tetR]}{K_{pTet} + \frac{K_{pTet}.[aTc]}{K_{TetR-aTc}}.})^\gamma} - \delta_{lacI}.[lacI]$
      </center>
      </center>
      <p>
      <p>
-
A demonstration of this system of ODE is available in the previous pdf file.
+
With this ODE system, we follow the evolution of the concentration of the two toggle switch repressors,
-
      </p>
+
TetR and LacI. This gives us the state of the bacteria. A demonstration of this ODE system is available
-
      <p>
+
in the previous pdf file. We briefly explain the equations below.
-
With this ODE’s system, we follow the evolution of the concentration of the two repressors of
+
-
the toggle switch, TetR and LacI. Which is giving us the state of the bacteria.
+
  </p>
  </p>
  <p>
  <p>
-
Both equations are construct using the same approach. There is a term of production and
+
Both equations are developed following the same approach. There is a term of production and a term of  
-
a term of degradation. Parameters kpLac .[pLac]tot represents the synthesis rate of the promoter
+
degradation. The parameters $k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}$ represent the protein synthesis rate from the pLac promoter.
-
pLac. KpLac is the dissociation constant of LacI and pLac. KlacI−IPTG is the dissociation constant
+
K_{pLac} and K_{lacI−IPTG} are the dissociation constants of LacI and pLac, and LacI and IPTG, respectively.
-
of lacI and IPTG. The parameters β and γ traduce the cooperativity of repression, which means
+
The parameters β and γ denote the cooperativity of repression, that is, the number of repressors bound
-
the number of repressors bound to the promoter.
+
to the promoter.  
  </p>
  </p>
  <p>
  <p>
-
We can see from this system, that the rate of variation of repressor TetR is modulated by the
+
According to these equations, the rate of variation of repressor TetR is inhibited by the repressor LacI.
-
concentration of the repressor lacI which inhibits TetR synthesis which itself depens on the IPTG
+
The degree of inhibition is modulated by the IPTG concentration. Reciprocally in the second equation,  
-
concentration. Reciprocally in the second equation, the variation of lacI depends on TetR which
+
the rate of variation of LacI depends on TetR, whose negative effect is modulated by aTc.
-
is modulated by aTc.
+
  </p>
  </p>
  <p><strong>
  <p><strong>
Line 133: Line 206:
    </ol>
    </ol>
 +
    <p>
 +
With this model, we were able to predict the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Toggle#TS_QS">behavior of our toggle switch</a>.
 +
    </p>
</div>
</div>
<div  class="blocbackground" id="Our_EquationsQS">
<div  class="blocbackground" id="Our_EquationsQS">
Line 138: Line 214:
  <h3>Quorum sensing</h3>
  <h3>Quorum sensing</h3>
    <ol>
    <ol>
-
      <li>Mathematical Models</li>
+
      <li>Mathematical Model</li>
      <p>
      <p>
-
In a second part, we define a model able to caracterize the quorum sensing part of our genetic network
+
In a second part, we define a model able to characterize the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Design/quorum">quorum sensing module</a> of our genetic network,
-
perfomed by quorum sensing genes.
+
which involves the quorum sensing genes CinI and CinR, as well as the signaling molecule AHL.<br/>
-
  </p>
+
-
  <p>
+
In order to model the Quorum Sensing module, we detail below the different reactions taking place
-
Our work mainly refers to the models set up by the 2007 iGEM Bangalore team. On the basis of their work
+
inside this module. For reasons that will become clear later, we focus on a particular area of our
-
we set up models adapted to our own system. For these reasons we strongly recommend getting familiar
+
device, where neighboring bacteria will have a different behavior, although they carry the same
-
with the works of the 2007 Bangalore team for an easier understanding of the models we used.
+
genetic circuit.
-
  </p>
+
-
  <p>
+
-
The main difference between our models is that their model is designed for a whole medium, in which
+
-
the concentrations of quorum sensing molecules are considered for a whole fixed volume of a medium.
+
-
Our system, however, is supposed to describe the spatial diffusion of quorum sensing molecules as well,
+
-
and therefore needs to be designed for an infinitesimal volume of medium containing bacteries and outside medium.
+
-
A few other differences exist between our model and theirs, mainly due to the fact that the system we intend to
+
-
describe is made of other different parts. For example the production rate of our Quorum Sensing enzymes are
+
-
directly linked to the previously described toggle switch model.  
+
-
  </p>
+
-
      <p>
+
-
For these reasons we strongly recommend getting familiar with the works of the 2007 Bangalore team for an
+
-
easier understanding of the models we used.
+
-
      </p>
+
-
      <p>
+
-
In a second part, we define a model able to caracterize the quorum sensing part of our genetic network
+
-
perfomed by quorum sensing genes.<br/>
+
-
At the boundary, quorum sensing molecules produced by secretory bacteria diffuse and enter in the receving bacteria.
+
-
In order to well characterize the quorum sensing part, we need to well understand the mecanism.
+
  </p>
  </p>
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/QS_details_2.png" class="centerwide" style="bow-shadow: non"/>
  <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/QS_details_2.png" class="centerwide" style="bow-shadow: non"/>
-
  <div class="legend"><strong>Figure 1:</strong>Mecanism of Quorum Sensing diffusion at the boundary</div>
+
  <div class="legend"><strong>Figure 1:</strong>Mechanism of Quorum Sensing diffusion at the boundary</div>
  <p>
  <p>
-
According to the figure, several steps must be taken into account:
+
According to the figure, several must be taken into account:
<ol>
<ol>
<li>the production of the Quorum Sensing molecule</li>
<li>the production of the Quorum Sensing molecule</li>
Line 183: Line 240:
To model these mecanisms, we need to follow the evolution of the following quantities
To model these mecanisms, we need to follow the evolution of the following quantities
<ul>
<ul>
-
<li>$[QS_i]$ concentration of the intracellular Quorum Sensing.</li>
+
<li>$[QS_i]$ concentration of the intracellular Quorum Sensing molecule.</li>
-
<li>$[QS_e]$ concentration of the extracellular Quorum Sensing.</li>
+
<li>$[QS_e]$ concentration of the extracellular Quorum Sensing molecule.</li>
<li>$[cinR]$ concentration of the Quorum Sensing receptor.</li>
<li>$[cinR]$ concentration of the Quorum Sensing receptor.</li>
<li>$[cinI]$ concentration of the Quorum Sensing producer enzyme.</li>
<li>$[cinI]$ concentration of the Quorum Sensing producer enzyme.</li>
Line 197: Line 254:
  $\frac{d[QS_e]}{dt} = \rho v_c\eta([QS_i]-[QS_e])-\delta_{QSe} [QS_e] + D_{diff}\frac{\partial^2 [QS_e]}{\partial x^2}$<br/><br/>
  $\frac{d[QS_e]}{dt} = \rho v_c\eta([QS_i]-[QS_e])-\delta_{QSe} [QS_e] + D_{diff}\frac{\partial^2 [QS_e]}{\partial x^2}$<br/><br/>
  $\frac{d[cinR_{free}]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}}{1 +  (\frac{[lacI_{total}]}{K_{pLac} + \frac{K_{pLac}.[IPTG]}{K_{lacI-IPTG}}.})^\beta} - \delta_{cinR}[cinR_{free}] - V_{complexation}$<br/><br/>
  $\frac{d[cinR_{free}]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}}{1 +  (\frac{[lacI_{total}]}{K_{pLac} + \frac{K_{pLac}.[IPTG]}{K_{lacI-IPTG}}.})^\beta} - \delta_{cinR}[cinR_{free}] - V_{complexation}$<br/><br/>
-
  $\frac{[cinR_{comp}]}{} = K_{comp}([cinR_{free}].[QS_i])$<br/><br/>
+
  $\frac{d[cinR_{comp}]}{dt} = K_{comp}([cinR_{free}].[QS_i])$<br/><br/>
  </center>
  </center>
  <p>
  <p>
-
In the first equation, expressing the evolution of intracellular Quorum Sensing, 3 terms are involved: $[QS_e]-[QS_i]$ the diffusion through the membrane,
+
In the first equation, expressing the evolution of the concentration of the intracellular Quorum Sensing  
-
$\delta_{QSi} [QS_i]$ the degradation and $k_{QS-production}'[cinI]$ the production of Quorum Sensing by the enzyme cinI.
+
molecule, 3 terms are involved: $[QSe][QSi]$, which describes the diffusion through the membrane,  
 +
$\delta_{QSi}[QSi]$, the degradation and $k_{QS−production}[cinI]$, the production of Quorum Sensing molecule
 +
by the enzyme CinI.
In the second equation, expressing the evolution of extracellular Quorum Sensing, there is no production term, but a spatial diffusion term
In the second equation, expressing the evolution of extracellular Quorum Sensing, there is no production term, but a spatial diffusion term
$D_{diff}\frac{\partial^2 [QS_e]}{\partial x^2}$.
$D_{diff}\frac{\partial^2 [QS_e]}{\partial x^2}$.
  </p>
  </p>
  <p>
  <p>
-
To get the concentration of cinI and cinR, we used the toggle switch modelling. In fact, cinI is on the pathway  
+
The concentrations of CinI and CinR can be obtained by using the toggle switch modelling. Indeed, since CinI
-
of lacI and cinR on the pathway of TetR and their evolution follow the same equations. But we need to consider
+
is on the pathway of LacI and CinR on the pathway of Tet, their evolution follow the same equations.  
-
the complexation of cinR protein and Quorum Sensing molecule which is expressing by the term $V_{complexation}$
+
In addition we consider the complexation of the CinR protein and the Quorum Sensing molecule,
-
in the cinR equation. \[V_{complexation} = K_{comp}[QS_i][CinR_{free}]\] with $K_{comp}$ the affinity constant
+
which is expressed by the term $V_{complexation}$ in the CinR equation:
-
of AHL for cinR.
+
\[V_{complexation} = K_{comp}[QS_i][CinR_{free}]\]  
 +
with $K_{comp}$ the affinity constant of AHL for cinR.
  </p>
  </p>
  <p>
  <p>
-
In order to simplify the model, we considered that the complexation is totally done and depends only on $[cinR]$
+
In order to simplify the model, we considered that the complexation of CinR to AHL is total and depends only  
-
and $[QS_i]$.
+
on $[cinR]$ and $[QS_i] which is the limitant factor$.
  </p>
  </p>
  <p><strong>
  <p><strong>
-
To solve this set of equation, we couldn't use an ODE's matlab solver because equations were derived both in  
+
To solve this set of equations, we couldn't use a classical ODE solver from Matlab (Mathworks), because  
-
time and space. That's why, we needed to use the finite differences method. For this, we build a matrix
+
the equations are derived both in time and space. We therefore needed to use the finite difference method.
-
based on Taylor's series discretization.
+
To that aim, we build a matrix based on Taylor's series discretization.
  </strong></p>
  </strong></p>
Line 232: Line 292:
$M_{QSe}(m+1,n+1) = [QS_e](x + dx,t+dt)$
$M_{QSe}(m+1,n+1) = [QS_e](x + dx,t+dt)$
</center>
</center>
 +
<p>
 +
In these equations, m represents the spatial dimension and n the temporal dimension.
 +
</p>
<img src="http://2011.iGEM.org/wiki/images/c/c6/Matrix_QS.png" class="centerwide" style="box-shadow: none"/>
<img src="http://2011.iGEM.org/wiki/images/c/c6/Matrix_QS.png" class="centerwide" style="box-shadow: none"/>
<ul>
<ul>
Line 250: Line 313:
  </li>
  </li>
  <li>
  <li>
-
    Of course, Qi, CinI and CinR matrices will be similarly implemented.
+
    Of course, QSi, CinI and CinR matrices will be similarly implemented.
  </li>
  </li>
</ul>
</ul>
Line 256: Line 319:
<li>Discretization of the equation</li>
<li>Discretization of the equation</li>
<p>
<p>
-
  With our continuous equations set, we want to obtain discrete definition of each of the matrices. The interdepen-
+
  With our continuous equations set, we want to obtain discrete definition of each of the matrices. interdependencies
-
  dancies of the equations imply that the computation of the matrices will be performed on the entire CinI matrix
+
  of the equations imply that the computation of the matrices will be performed on the entire CinI matrix
-
  first, then each line of the Qi and Qe matrices will be computed alternatively. Finally CinR matrix computation
+
  first, then each line of the Qi and Qe matrices will be computed alternatively. The computation of the CinR
-
  will be performed.
+
  will be eventually performed.
</p>
</p>
<p>
<p>
Line 275: Line 338:
$<br/><br/>
$<br/><br/>
$
$
-
with D_{m} =\rho v_c \eta .M_{QSi}(m,n) - M_{QSe}(m,n)(\delta_{QSe} + \rho v_c \eta)
+
with D_{m} =\rho v_c \eta .M_{QSi}(m,n) - M_{QSe}(m,n)(\delta_{QSe} + \rho v_c \eta)
$<br/><br/>
$<br/><br/>
$
$
-
M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n+1) = \Delta t (\frac{k_{pTet}[P_{Tet total}]}{1+ (\frac{[TetR]}{K_{pTet}(1+\frac{[aTc]}{K_{TetR - aTc}})})^{n_{pTet}}} - M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n)(\delta_{CinR} - k_{comp}.M_{Qi}(m,n))) + M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n)$<br/>
+
M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n+1) = \Delta t (\frac{k_{pTet}[P_{Tet total}]}{1+ (\frac{[TetR]}{K_{pTet}(1+\frac{[aTc]}{K_{TetR - aTc}})})^{n_{pTet}}} - M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n)(\delta_{CinR} - k_{comp}.M_{Qi}(m,n))) + M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n)$<br/>
</center>
</center>
Line 286: Line 349:
The CinI matrix does not depend on space dimension, it is then possible to compute it without discretization with
The CinI matrix does not depend on space dimension, it is then possible to compute it without discretization with
a differential solver.</strong>
a differential solver.</strong>
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<p><strong>
 +
Moreover to get the coupling of toggle switch and quorum sensing modules, we used the results of the first one
 +
(lacI and TetR evolution) to get the evolution of quorum sensing proteins (respectively cinI and cinR).
 +
It means that the output of the first module are used as input for the second module.</strong>
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
With this model, we were able to predict how the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results/Toggle#QS">red stripe appears</a> on the plate
</p>
</p>
Line 294: Line 367:
  <h2>Our algorithms</h2>
  <h2>Our algorithms</h2>
    <p>
    <p>
-
      In the MATLAB archive that can be found <a href="http://iGEMgrenoble-files.perso.sfr.fr/2011/MATLAB_Archives/">here</a>
+
      An archive containing our Matlab scripts for the deterministic modeling can be found <a href="http://iGEMgrenoble-files.perso.sfr.fr/2011/MATLAB_Archives/">here</a>
-
      containing our matlab scripts for deterministic modelling (file Deterministic_archive.tar.gz) you can launch an ODE based
+
      (file Deterministic_archive.tar.gz). You can launch and ODE-based simulation(see our ODEs in  
-
      simulation (see our ODEs in the two previous sections) with the file biosenseur1Dmain.m.
+
      the two previous sections) with the file biosenseur1Dmain.m.
    </p>
    </p>
    <p>
    <p>
-
      Several dialog boxes will pop up to enter the specificities of the simulation : (physical  
+
      Several dialog boxes will pop up to enter the specificities of the simulation: (physical  
-
      specificities of the device, chemical species concentrations and IPTG gradient )
+
      specificities of the device, chemical species concentrations and IPTG gradient).
    </p>
    </p>
     
     
    <p>
    <p>
-
      At the end of the simulation you obtain 3 matrices named M_stock, M_QS and M_comp containing the concentrations in each protein
+
At the end of the simulation you obtain 3 matrices named M_stock, M_QS and M_comp containing the concentrations
-
      species at each time point and on each physical point of the plate. We wrote three MATLAB scripts that display the concentration in proteins
+
in each protein species at each time point and on each physical point of the plate. We wrote three Matlab scripts
-
      dynamically that you can call with DynamicplottingTS, DynamicplottingQS and DynamicplottingCP. For a good understanding of the models and
+
(DynamicplottingTS, DynamicplottingQS and DynamicplottingCP) that dynamically display the protein concentrations.
-
      of our results we also wrote a script to illustrate the coloration of our plate through time according to our models named Imageshow.m.
+
For a good understanding of the models and of our results, we also wrote a script (Imageshow.m) to illustrate  
-
    </p>
+
the plate coloration.
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
To see the results we obtained with this algorithms, refer to this <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Results">page</a>.
 +
</p>
</div>
</div>
-
<div id="selector">
+
<center>
<form method="get" >
<form method="get" >
  <input type="button" value="< PREVIOUS <" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling';" />
  <input type="button" value="< PREVIOUS <" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling';" />
Line 318: Line 396:
    <optgroup label="Modelling Homepage">
    <optgroup label="Modelling Homepage">
     
     
-
    <option value="#Content" selected="selected">Table of content</option>
+
    <option value="#Content" >Table of content</option>
    </optgroup>
    </optgroup>
Line 324: Line 402:
    <optgroup label="Construction of the model" >
    <optgroup label="Construction of the model" >
                                  
                                  
-
                                     <option value="/Deterministic#Our_EquationsTS" >Establishment of the equation - Toggle switch</option>
+
                                     <option value="/Deterministic#Our_EquationsTS" selected="selected">Establishment of the equation - Toggle switch</option>
                                     <option value="/Deterministic#Our_EquationsQS" >Establishment of the equation - Quorum sensing</option>
                                     <option value="/Deterministic#Our_EquationsQS" >Establishment of the equation - Quorum sensing</option>
Line 346: Line 424:
                              
                              
    <option value="/Parameters">Table of parameters</option>
    <option value="/Parameters">Table of parameters</option>
-
    <option value="/Parameters">Sensitivity to parameters</option>
 
-
 
-
    </optgroup>
 
-
                           
 
-
                            <optgroup label="Analysis of the system">
 
-
                           
 
-
    <option value="/Results#Validation">Simulation of bacteria distribution</option>
 
-
<option value="/Results#Validation">Stability of the system</option>
 
-
    <option value="/Results#Device">Device specificities</option>
 
    </optgroup>
    </optgroup>
Line 360: Line 429:
                     <input type="hidden" name="id2" value="0" />
                     <input type="hidden" name="id2" value="0" />
                     <input type="submit" value="Go!" />
                     <input type="submit" value="Go!" />
-
  <input type="button" value="> NEXT >" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling/Deterministic';" />
+
  <input type="button" value="> NEXT >" onclick="document.location = '/Team:Grenoble/Projet/Modelling/Stochastic';" />
                  
                  
             </form>
             </form>
 +
            </center>
 +
             </div>
             </div>

Latest revision as of 03:07, 29 October 2011

Grenoble 2011, Mercuro-Coli iGEM


Construction of the model

PDF version of the next two sections (Equations for Toggle Switch and Quorum sensing)

As a proof of concept, we will consider anhydrotetracycline (aTc) instead of Mercury in our model, and the transcriptional regulator TetR in place of MerR. The TetR system is well characterized in E. coli, which facilitates the modelling. In addition, if the system works well with aTc, it should work as well with Mercury, Copper or lead for example.

In addition, since aTc diffuse freely accross the membrane of the cell, we do not have to take complex uptake mechanisms into considerations. Mercury is ionized and its entry in the cells depends on the presence of transporter protein.
So in the following chapter, we are going to use TetR instead of MerR and aTc instead of Mercury.

The Two modules of Modelling

Large-scale biochemical networks are classically decomposed into modules of smaller size to facilitate the model building process and the model calibration. The approach consists in modelling each module separately and integrating the different models into a larger model of the whole system. Like divided our genetic network in severals part (see genetic network), we also divided our model in two independant level of modelling:

  • The Toggle Switch module: modelling this network module allows to predict in which state the bacteria are. In particular, we can determine the switching conditions in bacteria and the localization of the switching area on the device (that depend on both IPTG and aTc concentrations). This gives indications on how to adjust the size of the device to improve the aTc detection.
  • The Quorum Sensing and Coloration module:the corresponding model is used to predict the localization and the width of the red line on the device. The modelling results are used to improve the device precision, for instance, by choosing between a device with a continuous bacterial layer and a device with strips containing bacteria. Each strip has the same concentration of aTc, but a different IPTG concentration.

The first level of the model will allow us to define the switch conditions in bacteria, depending on the concentrations of aTc and IPTG. From these results, we could see where the switch zone will appear on the device and therefore, the position of the red line. These parts of the results indicate the range of aTc that can be detected.

The second level will give us an estimation of the red line width, which indicates the system precision. Based on these results, we could improve the precision of our device, for instance, by comparing between a device with a continuous bacterial layer and a device with strips containing bacteria. Each strip has a different IPTG concentration, but the same concentration of Mercury.

Two independent levels of modelling which are coupled in order to get a global simulation of the device.

Establishment of the equation

Toggle switch

In a first part, we define a model to caracterize the Toggle Switch module of our genetic network.

  1. Biological Model
  2. A toggle switch consists of two genes, each coding for a protein that represses the expression of the other gene. This double repression system ensures the basic function of a toggle switch: a bistable system which can be switched from one state to the other by putting, in our example, some IPTG or aTc molecules in the medium.

    The biological system we are trying to implement is more complex, on both the biological and physical side. However, the toggle switch model is basically the same. In the study of the toggle switch itself, the system can be reduced to a simple two-state subsystem that we will then use for the rest of our modelling. However, our toggle switch model is basically the same: we can reduce it to a simple two-state subsystem that we will then use for the rest of our modelling. The toggle switch itself is not influenced by the rest of the system, if we do not consider the RsmA regulatory system that will be modeled at the very end of our work. Thus we will be able to model the toggle switch independently and then build the rest of the model upon this basis.

  3. Mathematical Model
  4. In order to get the state of the bacteria, we need to compute the concentration of both repressors. To obtain these variations, we develop a system of ordinary differential equations (ODES) which governs the behavior of the Toggle Switch.

    $ \frac{d[TetR]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}}{1 + (\frac{[lacI]}{K_{pLac} + \frac{K_{pLac}.[IPTG]}{K_{lacI-IPTG}}.})^\beta} - \delta_{TetR}.[TetR]$

    $\frac{d[lacI]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pTet}.[pTet]_{tot}}{1 + (\frac{[tetR]}{K_{pTet} + \frac{K_{pTet}.[aTc]}{K_{TetR-aTc}}.})^\gamma} - \delta_{lacI}.[lacI]$

    With this ODE system, we follow the evolution of the concentration of the two toggle switch repressors, TetR and LacI. This gives us the state of the bacteria. A demonstration of this ODE system is available in the previous pdf file. We briefly explain the equations below.

    Both equations are developed following the same approach. There is a term of production and a term of degradation. The parameters $k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}$ represent the protein synthesis rate from the pLac promoter. K_{pLac} and K_{lacI−IPTG} are the dissociation constants of LacI and pLac, and LacI and IPTG, respectively. The parameters β and γ denote the cooperativity of repression, that is, the number of repressors bound to the promoter.

    According to these equations, the rate of variation of repressor TetR is inhibited by the repressor LacI. The degree of inhibition is modulated by the IPTG concentration. Reciprocally in the second equation, the rate of variation of LacI depends on TetR, whose negative effect is modulated by aTc.

    This indicates that the two equations are coupled. And also that only one repressor could be predominant, as shown later.

    These two equations can be easily computed with a differential solver. We can precisely estimate the effects of each parameter.

With this model, we were able to predict the behavior of our toggle switch.

Establishment of the equation

Quorum sensing

  1. Mathematical Model
  2. In a second part, we define a model able to characterize the quorum sensing module of our genetic network, which involves the quorum sensing genes CinI and CinR, as well as the signaling molecule AHL.
    In order to model the Quorum Sensing module, we detail below the different reactions taking place inside this module. For reasons that will become clear later, we focus on a particular area of our device, where neighboring bacteria will have a different behavior, although they carry the same genetic circuit.

    Figure 1:Mechanism of Quorum Sensing diffusion at the boundary

    According to the figure, several must be taken into account:

    1. the production of the Quorum Sensing molecule
    2. the secretion of the molecule
    3. the diffusion of the molecule in the medium
    4. the penetration of the molecule
    5. the complexation of the molecule with its receptor
    6. the activation of the coloration

    To model these mecanisms, we need to follow the evolution of the following quantities

    • $[QS_i]$ concentration of the intracellular Quorum Sensing molecule.
    • $[QS_e]$ concentration of the extracellular Quorum Sensing molecule.
    • $[cinR]$ concentration of the Quorum Sensing receptor.
    • $[cinI]$ concentration of the Quorum Sensing producer enzyme.
    • $[cinR_{comp}]$ concentration of the complexe cinR-QS.

    Based on the Bangalore 2007 iGEM team, we get the following system of equations:

    $\frac{d[QS_i]}{dt} = \eta([QS_e]-[QS_i])-\delta_{QSi} [QS_i] + k_{QS-production}'[cinI]$

    $\frac{d[QS_e]}{dt} = \rho v_c\eta([QS_i]-[QS_e])-\delta_{QSe} [QS_e] + D_{diff}\frac{\partial^2 [QS_e]}{\partial x^2}$

    $\frac{d[cinR_{free}]}{dt} = \frac{k_{pLac}.[pLac]_{tot}}{1 + (\frac{[lacI_{total}]}{K_{pLac} + \frac{K_{pLac}.[IPTG]}{K_{lacI-IPTG}}.})^\beta} - \delta_{cinR}[cinR_{free}] - V_{complexation}$

    $\frac{d[cinR_{comp}]}{dt} = K_{comp}([cinR_{free}].[QS_i])$

    In the first equation, expressing the evolution of the concentration of the intracellular Quorum Sensing molecule, 3 terms are involved: $[QSe]−[QSi]$, which describes the diffusion through the membrane, $\delta_{QSi}[QSi]$, the degradation and $k_{QS−production}[cinI]$, the production of Quorum Sensing molecule by the enzyme CinI. In the second equation, expressing the evolution of extracellular Quorum Sensing, there is no production term, but a spatial diffusion term $D_{diff}\frac{\partial^2 [QS_e]}{\partial x^2}$.

    The concentrations of CinI and CinR can be obtained by using the toggle switch modelling. Indeed, since CinI is on the pathway of LacI and CinR on the pathway of Tet, their evolution follow the same equations. In addition we consider the complexation of the CinR protein and the Quorum Sensing molecule, which is expressed by the term $V_{complexation}$ in the CinR equation: \[V_{complexation} = K_{comp}[QS_i][CinR_{free}]\] with $K_{comp}$ the affinity constant of AHL for cinR.

    In order to simplify the model, we considered that the complexation of CinR to AHL is total and depends only on $[cinR]$ and $[QS_i] which is the limitant factor$.

    To solve this set of equations, we couldn't use a classical ODE solver from Matlab (Mathworks), because the equations are derived both in time and space. We therefore needed to use the finite difference method. To that aim, we build a matrix based on Taylor's series discretization.

  3. Definition of the matrix
  4. To solve this set of equations we have to use a matrix that will describe our system in both space and time. for example for the QS molecule outside of the cell :

    $M_{QSe}(m,n) = [QS_e](x,t)$
    $M_{QSe}(m+1,n+1) = [QS_e](x + dx,t+dt)$

    In these equations, m represents the spatial dimension and n the temporal dimension.

    • On the spatial point of view, we only consider the x dimension, as the IPTG gradient will be only evolving along this dimension. Thus we consider the state of our cells is the same along the width of our plate.
    • With this Matrix, and after computation of all the terms, we can get the entire behaviour of CinI, CinR, QS inside and outside the cells.
    • The first line of the Matrix equals 0. These are the initial conditions we set to 0 at time t = 0s.
    • On the borders of the plate (x = 0 and x = L) the model used has to be different, limit conditions will be set.
    • Of course, QSi, CinI and CinR matrices will be similarly implemented.
  5. Discretization of the equation
  6. With our continuous equations set, we want to obtain discrete definition of each of the matrices. interdependencies of the equations imply that the computation of the matrices will be performed on the entire CinI matrix first, then each line of the Qi and Qe matrices will be computed alternatively. The computation of the CinR will be eventually performed.

    Parallel computation of all the matrices without proper control is not possible indeed, as the terms of Qi matrix will depend on the Qe terms of the preceding line (and vice-versa). Discretization is obtained with first order taylor series :

$ M_{QSi}(m,n+1) =\Delta t (\eta (M_{QSe}(m,n) - M_{QSi}(m,n)) - \delta_{QSi}.M_{QSi}(m,n) + k_{QSp}M_{CinI}(m,n)) + M_{QSi}(m,n) $

$ M_{QSe}(m,n+1) =\Delta t ( D_{m} + D_{diff} \frac{M_{QSe}(m+1,n) - 2 M_{QSe}(m,n) + M_{QSe}(m-1,n)}{\Delta x^2}) + M_{QSe}(m,n) $

$ with D_{m} =\rho v_c \eta .M_{QSi}(m,n) - M_{QSe}(m,n)(\delta_{QSe} + \rho v_c \eta) $

$ M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n+1) = \Delta t (\frac{k_{pTet}[P_{Tet total}]}{1+ (\frac{[TetR]}{K_{pTet}(1+\frac{[aTc]}{K_{TetR - aTc}})})^{n_{pTet}}} - M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n)(\delta_{CinR} - k_{comp}.M_{Qi}(m,n))) + M_{CinR_{free}}(m,n)$

With these discrete equations the 4 matrices can be computed through simple calculation loops over each line. The CinI matrix does not depend on space dimension, it is then possible to compute it without discretization with a differential solver.

Moreover to get the coupling of toggle switch and quorum sensing modules, we used the results of the first one (lacI and TetR evolution) to get the evolution of quorum sensing proteins (respectively cinI and cinR). It means that the output of the first module are used as input for the second module.

With this model, we were able to predict how the red stripe appears on the plate

Our algorithms

An archive containing our Matlab scripts for the deterministic modeling can be found here (file Deterministic_archive.tar.gz). You can launch and ODE-based simulation(see our ODEs in the two previous sections) with the file biosenseur1Dmain.m.

Several dialog boxes will pop up to enter the specificities of the simulation: (physical specificities of the device, chemical species concentrations and IPTG gradient).

At the end of the simulation you obtain 3 matrices named M_stock, M_QS and M_comp containing the concentrations in each protein species at each time point and on each physical point of the plate. We wrote three Matlab scripts (DynamicplottingTS, DynamicplottingQS and DynamicplottingCP) that dynamically display the protein concentrations. For a good understanding of the models and of our results, we also wrote a script (Imageshow.m) to illustrate the plate coloration.

To see the results we obtained with this algorithms, refer to this page.