Team:Osaka/safety
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(8 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | <div class=" | + | <div class="padding"> |
<h2>Safety</h2> | <h2>Safety</h2> | ||
- | Although we did not encounter any issues with biosafety during the course of this project, a discussion of safety is mandated by the iGEM requirements so we included it here. | + | <p>Although we did not encounter any issues with biosafety during the course of this project, a discussion of safety is mandated by the iGEM requirements so we included it here. |
- | < | + | </p> |
<ol> | <ol> | ||
+ | <li><i><b>Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>researcher safety,</li> | ||
+ | <li>public safety, or</li> | ||
+ | <li>environmental safety?</li> | ||
+ | </ul></b></i> | ||
+ | We use E.coli strain DH5α, and DNA used in our laboratory were all of safe genes, moreover, our experiment was controlled under P1 level room. | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<li><i><b>Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?</b></i> | <li><i><b>Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?</b></i> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | No. | + | No. |
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 26: | Line 36: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | |||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 03:59, 6 October 2011
Safety
Although we did not encounter any issues with biosafety during the course of this project, a discussion of safety is mandated by the iGEM requirements so we included it here.
- Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
- researcher safety,
- public safety, or
- environmental safety?
- Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?
No. - Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
- If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
- Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
It may be better for part requests to be sent out as purified DNA instead of bacterial stabs as was done this year. Bacterial stabs may cause some issues when going through customs in certain countries (Japan, for example).