Team:UTP-Panama/Results

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Discussion of Results)
(Discussion of Results)
 
(42 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Team:UTP-Panama/utptemplate}}
{{Team:UTP-Panama/utptemplate}}
 +
<div align="center">
 +
[[Team:UTP-Panama/Experiments| '''Experiment 1 ''']]  |
 +
[[Team:UTP-Panama/Experiments2| '''Experiment 2  ''']]  |
 +
[[Team:UTP-Panama/Experiments3| '''Experiments 3 ''']]  |
 +
[[Team:UTP-Panama/Experiments4| '''Experiments 4 ''']]  |
 +
[[Team:UTP-Panama/Experiments5| '''New Results''']]  |
 +
[[Team:UTP-Panama/Results|'''Results''']]|
 +
</div>
== '''Spectrophotometry Results''' ==
== '''Spectrophotometry Results''' ==
<br>
<br>
-
<br>
+
<div align="center">'''Experiments with BBa_K381001'''
-
[[File:uno.jpg]]<br>
+
-
[[File:dos.jpg]]<br>
+
-
• It grows well @23°C (best in Minimal Media than LB)<br>
+
-
• It shows almost no growth @8°C<br>
+
-
[[File:tres.jpg]]<br>
+
[[File:unonuevo.jpg|center|490px|]]<br>
-
==Discussion of Results==
+
<div align="justify">From these data we could conclude that:
-
As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, and grew regular under  cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and not grew at 8°C.<br>
+
-
The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than our device (expected to work better)<br>
+
-
Looking the results for the BBa_410000, he decrease the capability of the BBa_381001, under cold shock.
+
• The BB grows best in LB.
-
''The next step in our project:''<br>
+
 
-
Continue with our original design we are are planning to use other promoter (CspA in stead of HybB).
+
• It grows less in Minimal Media.
-
We keep experimenting around our device <br>
+
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth in Saline Solution.
 +
 
 +
• Il grows best @37°C
 +
 
 +
• It grows good @23°C
 +
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth @8°C
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div align="center">'''Experiments with BBa_K410000'''
 +
 
 +
[[File:dosnuevo.jpg|center|490px|]]<br>
 +
 
 +
<div align="justify">From these data we could conclude that:
 +
 
 +
• The BB grows best in LB.
 +
 
 +
• It grows well in Minimal Media.
 +
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth in Saline Solution.
 +
 
 +
• Il grows best @37°C
 +
 +
• It grows well @23°C (best in Minimal Media than LB)
 +
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth @8°C
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div align="center">'''Experiments with BBa_K672000'''<div align="center">
 +
 
 +
[[File:tresnuevo.jpg|center|490px|]]<br>
 +
 
 +
<div align="justify">From these data we could conclude that:
 +
 
 +
• The BB grows best in LB.
 +
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth in Minimal Media.
 +
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth in Saline Solution.
 +
 
 +
• Il grows best @37°C
 +
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth @23°C, just in LB.
 +
 
 +
• It shows almost no growth @8°C
 +
 
 +
 
 +
We also studied the behavior of BBa_K381001 @23°C and @37°C in LB and Minimal Media; we detected the GFP expression using the spectophotometer, the graphs are shown below.
 +
 
 +
[[File:bristolnuevo.jpg|center|490px|]]<br>
== Graphs: ==
== Graphs: ==
-
[[Image:Untitled35.jpg‎|center]]
+
<div align="center">'''Experiments 1, 2 & 3:'''</div>
-
[[Image:Untitled45.jpg|center ]]
 
-
[[Image:Untitled33.jpg|center ]]
+
[[Image:8grados.jpg‎|center|700px]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:23grados.jpg|center|700px]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:37grados.jpg|center|700px]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div align="center">'''Other Experiments with Bristol:'''</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:023grados.jpg|center|600px]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:037grados.jpg|center|600px]]
 +
 
 +
==Discussion of Results==
 +
As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C.<br>
 +
The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than the BBa_410000 and our device (expected to work better).<br>
 +
 
 +
Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock.
 +
 
 +
From these results we could determine sources of errors during the experiments and learn from these for our further investigations.
 +
 
 +
''The next step in our project:''<br>
 +
Continuing with our original design, we are are planning to use another promoter as the '''CspA''' in stead of HybB, that improve the gene expression under cold shock.
 +
We will keep experimenting with our device. <br><br>
 +
<br>
 +
'''It´s ok for our first year, with students without Life Sciences background!
 +
'''VIVA iGEM!''' We learned a lot.... see you in '''Indiana''' and '''MIT'''

Latest revision as of 03:42, 29 October 2011

DSCF7003.jpg

Logoigempeginav1.png

Home

The Team

The Project

Parts

Project & Experiments Design

Human Practices

Notebook

Gallery

Safety

Data Page

Sponsors

Center



Spectrophotometry Results


Experiments with BBa_K381001
Unonuevo.jpg

From these data we could conclude that:

• The BB grows best in LB.

• It grows less in Minimal Media.

• It shows almost no growth in Saline Solution.

• Il grows best @37°C

• It grows good @23°C

• It shows almost no growth @8°C


Experiments with BBa_K410000
Dosnuevo.jpg

From these data we could conclude that:

• The BB grows best in LB.

• It grows well in Minimal Media.

• It shows almost no growth in Saline Solution.

• Il grows best @37°C

• It grows well @23°C (best in Minimal Media than LB)

• It shows almost no growth @8°C


Experiments with BBa_K672000
Tresnuevo.jpg

From these data we could conclude that:

• The BB grows best in LB.

• It shows almost no growth in Minimal Media.

• It shows almost no growth in Saline Solution.

• Il grows best @37°C

• It shows almost no growth @23°C, just in LB.

• It shows almost no growth @8°C


We also studied the behavior of BBa_K381001 @23°C and @37°C in LB and Minimal Media; we detected the GFP expression using the spectophotometer, the graphs are shown below.

Bristolnuevo.jpg

Graphs:

Experiments 1, 2 & 3:


8grados.jpg


23grados.jpg


37grados.jpg


Other Experiments with Bristol:


023grados.jpg


037grados.jpg

Discussion of Results

As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C.
The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than the BBa_410000 and our device (expected to work better).

Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock.

From these results we could determine sources of errors during the experiments and learn from these for our further investigations.

The next step in our project:
Continuing with our original design, we are are planning to use another promoter as the CspA in stead of HybB, that improve the gene expression under cold shock. We will keep experimenting with our device.


It´s ok for our first year, with students without Life Sciences background!

VIVA iGEM! We learned a lot.... see you in Indiana and MIT