Team:UT Dallas/immunobot modeling

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(15 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 70: Line 70:
<div class="contents">
<div class="contents">
-
<div id="container2">
+
<div id="container2">
-
<div id="container1">
+
<div id="container1">
<div id="left">  
<div id="left">  
</html>{{:Team:UT_Dallas/Template:menu}}<html>
</html>{{:Team:UT_Dallas/Template:menu}}<html>
Line 79: Line 79:
The signaling network from the input of external ligand signal to the output of the tumbling state of a E coli cell can be quantitatively described by a modular model. The model is formulated based on the law of mass action and Michaelis-Menten mechanism and contains four relatively independent modules that are explained in detail below. <br><br>
The signaling network from the input of external ligand signal to the output of the tumbling state of a E coli cell can be quantitatively described by a modular model. The model is formulated based on the law of mass action and Michaelis-Menten mechanism and contains four relatively independent modules that are explained in detail below. <br><br>
-
Module 1: Activation of ToxR receptor<br>
+
<b>Module 1:</b> Activation of ToxR receptor<br>
In this module, the ligand signal activates the ToxR receptor into a dimerized complex formed with the ligand, which is the active state of the receptor. The biochemical reaction can be illustrated as: <br>
In this module, the ligand signal activates the ToxR receptor into a dimerized complex formed with the ligand, which is the active state of the receptor. The biochemical reaction can be illustrated as: <br>
<center>
<center>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c4/Equation1.png"><br>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c4/Equation1.png"><br>
</center>
</center>
-
where L, R, C and C2 represent the concentration of external ligand, free receptor, recptor-ligand complex, and the dimerized receptor-ligand complex. The first reaction represents the binding/unbinding between the free receptor and the ligand. The second reaction represents the dimerization /undimerization conversions between C and C2. The conservation of the total concentration of the receptor can be written as:  
+
where L, R, C and C2 represent the concentration of external ligand, free receptor, recptor-ligand complex, and the dimerized receptor-ligand complex. The first reaction represents the binding/unbinding between the free receptor and the ligand. The second reaction represents the dimerization/undimerization conversions between C and C2. The conservation of the total concentration of the receptor can be written as:  
  <br>
  <br>
<center>
<center>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/ea/Equation2.png"><br>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/ea/Equation2.png"><br>
</center>
</center>
-
where R^T is the total receptor concentration. The governing differential equations of this module are:
+
where R<sup>T</sup> is the total receptor concentration. The governing differential equations of this module are:
  <br>
  <br>
<center>
<center>
Line 100: Line 100:
</center>
</center>
-
The equations contain binding rate k_f L(R^T-C-2C_2 ), unbinding rate k_r C, dimerization rate k_dim C^2 and undimerization rate 2k_undim C_2, where k_f, k_r, k_dim and k_undim represent the rate constants for binding, unbinding, dimerization and undimerization reactions. The values of the parameters are obtained from (Forsten-Williams, Chua et al. 2005). Typical simulation results in response to L=1 µM are:
+
The equations contain binding rate k<sub>f</sub>L(R<sup>T</sup>-C-2C<sub>2</sub> ), unbinding rate k<sub>r</sub>C, dimerization rate k<sub>dim</sub>C<sup>2</sup> and undimerization rate 2k<sub>undim</sub>C<sub>2</sub>, where k<sub>f</sub>, k<sub>r</sub>, k<sub>dim</sub> and k<sub>undim</sub> represent the rate constants for binding, unbinding, dimerization and undimerization reactions. The values of the parameters are obtained from (Forsten-Williams, Chua et al. 2005). Typical simulation results in response to L=1 µM are:
-
<br>
+
-
<center>
+
-
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Plot1.png"><br>
+
-
</center>
+
-
<br>
 
<center>
<center>
 +
<table>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Plot1.png"><br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/7e/Plot2.png"><br>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/7e/Plot2.png"><br>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr></table>
</center>
</center>
 +
where the dissociation constant for receptor-ligand binding used in the right figure is 100 times than that in the left figure.
where the dissociation constant for receptor-ligand binding used in the right figure is 100 times than that in the left figure.
-
<br>
+
<br><br>
-
<b>Module 2.</b> Transcription/translation of CheZ<br>
+
 
-
In this module, the dimerized complex C_2 activates the transcription of the cheZ mRNA. The reactions are the standard transcription and translation reactions illustrated as:<br>
+
<b>Module 2:</b> Transcription/translation of CheZ<br>
 +
In this module, the dimerized complex C<sub>2</sub> activates the transcription of the cheZ mRNA. The reactions are the standard transcription and translation reactions illustrated as:<br>
<center>
<center>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0c/Equation5.jpg"><br>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0c/Equation5.jpg"><br>
Line 130: Line 135:
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/9a/Equation7.jpg"><br>
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/9a/Equation7.jpg"><br>
</center>
</center>
 +
 +
Where k<sub>0</sub> represents the basal transcription rate of Z<sub>m</sub>, k<sub>1</sub> represents the transcription rate activated by C<sub>2</sub>, k<sub>3</sub> represents the translational rate of Z<sub>p</sub>, and k<sub>2</sub> and k<sub>4</sub> represent the degradation rates of Z<sub>m</sub> and Z<sub>p</sub>. Typical simulation results are:<br>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<table>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2f/Plot3.png"><br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c2/Plot4.png"><br>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr></table>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
where the degradation rate for Zp in the right figure is 10 times than that in the left figure.<br><br>
 +
 +
<b>Module 3</b><br>
 +
In this module, the CheY protein is dephosphorylated by the CheZ protein and the reaction can be illustrated as:<br>
 +
<center>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/09/Equation8.jpg"><br>
 +
</center>
 +
The governing differential equation follows the format given in (Spiro, Parkinson et al. 1997)         
 +
<br>
 +
<center>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a1/Equation9.png"><br>
 +
</center>
 +
Where Y<sup>T</sup> is the total concentration of the CheY protein, and k<sub>p</sub> and k<sub>d</sub> are the phosphorylation and the dephosphorylation rate constants of CheY. The parameter values are obtained from (Spiro, Parkinson et al. 1997). Typical simulation results are:<br>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<table>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c9/Plot5.png"><br>
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/6b/Plot6.png"><br>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr></table>
 +
</center>
 +
where again the degradation rate for Zp in the right figure is 10 times than that in the left figure.
 +
 +
<br><br>
 +
 +
<b>Module 4</b><br>In this module, the tumbling activity of E coli is characterized by the so-called “bias”, which is defined as the ratio of the time of directed movement and the total time. It is experimentally measured that the bias is a Hill function dependent on the concentration of phosphorylated CheY (Cluzel, Surette et al. 2000).<br>
 +
<center>
 +
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/40/Equation10.jpg"><br>
 +
</center>
 +
<br><br>
 +
Using the steady-state value of Yp in the previous two figures, that is 4.08 µM or 14.25µM, the final bias is 6.6% or .01%.<br><br>
 +
 +
<b>References</b><br>
 +
Cluzel, P., M. Surette, et al. (2000). "An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells." Science 287(5458): 1652-5.<br>
 +
Forsten-Williams, K., C. C. Chua, et al. (2005). "The kinetics of FGF-2 binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans and MAP kinase signaling." J Theor Biol 233(4): 483-99.<br>
 +
Spiro, P. A., J. S. Parkinson, et al. (1997). "A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(14): 7263-8.<br><br><br>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 03:25, 29 September 2011