Team:UT Dallas/immunobot modeling
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(19 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
<div class="contents"> | <div class="contents"> | ||
- | <div id="container2"> | + | <div id="container2"> |
- | + | <div id="container1"> | |
<div id="left"> | <div id="left"> | ||
</html>{{:Team:UT_Dallas/Template:menu}}<html> | </html>{{:Team:UT_Dallas/Template:menu}}<html> | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
The signaling network from the input of external ligand signal to the output of the tumbling state of a E coli cell can be quantitatively described by a modular model. The model is formulated based on the law of mass action and Michaelis-Menten mechanism and contains four relatively independent modules that are explained in detail below. <br><br> | The signaling network from the input of external ligand signal to the output of the tumbling state of a E coli cell can be quantitatively described by a modular model. The model is formulated based on the law of mass action and Michaelis-Menten mechanism and contains four relatively independent modules that are explained in detail below. <br><br> | ||
- | Module 1: Activation of ToxR receptor<br> | + | <b>Module 1:</b> Activation of ToxR receptor<br> |
In this module, the ligand signal activates the ToxR receptor into a dimerized complex formed with the ligand, which is the active state of the receptor. The biochemical reaction can be illustrated as: <br> | In this module, the ligand signal activates the ToxR receptor into a dimerized complex formed with the ligand, which is the active state of the receptor. The biochemical reaction can be illustrated as: <br> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c4/Equation1.png"><br> | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c4/Equation1.png"><br> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
- | where L, R, C and C2 represent the concentration of external ligand, free receptor, recptor-ligand complex, and the dimerized receptor-ligand complex. The first reaction represents the binding/unbinding between the free receptor and the ligand. The second reaction represents the dimerization /undimerization conversions between C and C2. The conservation of the total concentration of the receptor can be written as: | + | where L, R, C and C2 represent the concentration of external ligand, free receptor, recptor-ligand complex, and the dimerized receptor-ligand complex. The first reaction represents the binding/unbinding between the free receptor and the ligand. The second reaction represents the dimerization/undimerization conversions between C and C2. The conservation of the total concentration of the receptor can be written as: |
<br> | <br> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/ea/Equation2.png"><br> | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/ea/Equation2.png"><br> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
+ | where R<sup>T</sup> is the total receptor concentration. The governing differential equations of this module are: | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a7/Equation3.jpg"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/dd/Equation4.jpg"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The equations contain binding rate k<sub>f</sub>L(R<sup>T</sup>-C-2C<sub>2</sub> ), unbinding rate k<sub>r</sub>C, dimerization rate k<sub>dim</sub>C<sup>2</sup> and undimerization rate 2k<sub>undim</sub>C<sub>2</sub>, where k<sub>f</sub>, k<sub>r</sub>, k<sub>dim</sub> and k<sub>undim</sub> represent the rate constants for binding, unbinding, dimerization and undimerization reactions. The values of the parameters are obtained from (Forsten-Williams, Chua et al. 2005). Typical simulation results in response to L=1 µM are: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Plot1.png"><br> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/7e/Plot2.png"><br> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr></table> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | where the dissociation constant for receptor-ligand binding used in the right figure is 100 times than that in the left figure. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Module 2:</b> Transcription/translation of CheZ<br> | ||
+ | In this module, the dimerized complex C<sub>2</sub> activates the transcription of the cheZ mRNA. The reactions are the standard transcription and translation reactions illustrated as:<br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0c/Equation5.jpg"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | Where Zm and Zp represent the concentration of the mRNA and the protein product of CheZ. The formulation of the reactions follow the standard equations for transcription and translation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0a/Equation6.jpg"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/9a/Equation7.jpg"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where k<sub>0</sub> represents the basal transcription rate of Z<sub>m</sub>, k<sub>1</sub> represents the transcription rate activated by C<sub>2</sub>, k<sub>3</sub> represents the translational rate of Z<sub>p</sub>, and k<sub>2</sub> and k<sub>4</sub> represent the degradation rates of Z<sub>m</sub> and Z<sub>p</sub>. Typical simulation results are:<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2f/Plot3.png"><br> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c2/Plot4.png"><br> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr></table> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | where the degradation rate for Zp in the right figure is 10 times than that in the left figure.<br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Module 3</b><br> | ||
+ | In this module, the CheY protein is dephosphorylated by the CheZ protein and the reaction can be illustrated as:<br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/09/Equation8.jpg"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | The governing differential equation follows the format given in (Spiro, Parkinson et al. 1997) | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a1/Equation9.png"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | Where Y<sup>T</sup> is the total concentration of the CheY protein, and k<sub>p</sub> and k<sub>d</sub> are the phosphorylation and the dephosphorylation rate constants of CheY. The parameter values are obtained from (Spiro, Parkinson et al. 1997). Typical simulation results are:<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c9/Plot5.png"><br> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/6b/Plot6.png"><br> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr></table> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | where again the degradation rate for Zp in the right figure is 10 times than that in the left figure. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Module 4</b><br>In this module, the tumbling activity of E coli is characterized by the so-called “bias”, which is defined as the ratio of the time of directed movement and the total time. It is experimentally measured that the bias is a Hill function dependent on the concentration of phosphorylated CheY (Cluzel, Surette et al. 2000).<br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img hight='30' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/40/Equation10.jpg"><br> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | Using the steady-state value of Yp in the previous two figures, that is 4.08 µM or 14.25µM, the final bias is 6.6% or .01%.<br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>References</b><br> | ||
+ | Cluzel, P., M. Surette, et al. (2000). "An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells." Science 287(5458): 1652-5.<br> | ||
+ | Forsten-Williams, K., C. C. Chua, et al. (2005). "The kinetics of FGF-2 binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans and MAP kinase signaling." J Theor Biol 233(4): 483-99.<br> | ||
+ | Spiro, P. A., J. S. Parkinson, et al. (1997). "A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(14): 7263-8.<br><br><br> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 03:25, 29 September 2011
Model and simulation
The signaling network from the input of external ligand signal to the output of the tumbling state of a E coli cell can be quantitatively described by a modular model. The model is formulated based on the law of mass action and Michaelis-Menten mechanism and contains four relatively independent modules that are explained in detail below.Module 1: Activation of ToxR receptor
In this module, the ligand signal activates the ToxR receptor into a dimerized complex formed with the ligand, which is the active state of the receptor. The biochemical reaction can be illustrated as:
|
|
Module 2: Transcription/translation of CheZ
In this module, the dimerized complex C2 activates the transcription of the cheZ mRNA. The reactions are the standard transcription and translation reactions illustrated as:
|
|
Module 3
In this module, the CheY protein is dephosphorylated by the CheZ protein and the reaction can be illustrated as:
|
|
Module 4
In this module, the tumbling activity of E coli is characterized by the so-called “bias”, which is defined as the ratio of the time of directed movement and the total time. It is experimentally measured that the bias is a Hill function dependent on the concentration of phosphorylated CheY (Cluzel, Surette et al. 2000).
Using the steady-state value of Yp in the previous two figures, that is 4.08 µM or 14.25µM, the final bias is 6.6% or .01%.
References
Cluzel, P., M. Surette, et al. (2000). "An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells." Science 287(5458): 1652-5.
Forsten-Williams, K., C. C. Chua, et al. (2005). "The kinetics of FGF-2 binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans and MAP kinase signaling." J Theor Biol 233(4): 483-99.
Spiro, P. A., J. S. Parkinson, et al. (1997). "A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(14): 7263-8.