Team:Warsaw/SyntheticCloning

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Latest revision as of 20:07, 21 September 2011

Example Tabs

Synthetic cloning and phi29 amplification as a new safety standard

Generating large collection of biological parts requires processing large number of DNA constructs. Moreover one of the primary goals of the collections is sharing parts e.g. sending to researchers or to iGEM teams. To share parts is is obligatory to amplify DNA via transforming DNA to living cells. Some of the construct send to collection may increase pathogenicity - especially when transformed to E.Coli strain lacking particular required expression regulatory elements (e.g. repressor like LacI). Some of the parts may be newly synthesized parts or natural yet not fully tested. Those parts are potentially hazardous. Moreover GMO bacteria can escape to the environment. We developed a safe techniques of cloning and handling large collection of DNA parts without use of any living cells making it safe to researchers and the environment.

Safe storing and sharing of biological parts

We used phi29 rolling circle amplification to amplify DNA from the distribution. It performs rolling circle amplification of the circular plasmids, has high fidelity and procesivity. We managed to get lots of DNA in 2 hours. Protocol and experimental results ****here****. It is safe to use with pathogenic ad toxic genes. We would recommend it to everyone who works with collection of parts that are potentially dangerous. Also to everyone who value time.

Safe Synthetic Cloning meets the needs of biologists

Molecular cloning techniques require propagation of the construct in living cells that is transforming plasmids into e.g. E. coli and growing cultures overnight.

It is a time-consuming process and can't be easily sped up. We can speed up digestion by using fast enzymes and speed up gel electrophoresis by using lithium-borate buffer, but it is hard to make cells grow faster
Genes toxic to the new host (e.g. E. coli) are difficult to clone this way. Actually over-expression of naturally occurring proteins e.g. membrane transporters can be evolutionary disadvantageous. It means that you are likely to get lots of empty vectors while cloning these proteins in E. coli
Molecular clonig results in creation of genetically modified organisms at each cloning step. When working with potentially hazardous genes it is undesirable to have those genes transformed into cells without appropriate regulatory systems. It would be safer to construct genetically modified organisms only at the end of the process, when DNA constructs are ready. This is possible using DNA synthesis, but still reminds expensive.

A way to skip those problems would be to amplify the construct using PCR, but taq polymerase has error rate about 1 in 9,000 nucleotides. Since the early PCR products are also templates in the PCR reaction the errors accumulate.

Solution: phi29 polymerase based cell-free clonig

An interesting alternative is phi28 polymerase. It performs rolling circle amplification of the circular plasmids. It is processive and has high fidelity resulting in error rate about 10 to -7[1]. Although an error by phi29 DNA polymerase could occur, the error would not be exponentially amplified as in PCR.[2]

This is why amplification using phi29 polymerase can be use instead of living cells in cell free cloning.[3]
Moreover, phi29 amplification products can be used directly to synthesize protein in cell-free transcription-translation systems.[4]
This opens up a possibility of wet lab experiments without creation of genetically modified organisms, when it is not necessary.

Want to perform cell-free cloning? See ****here**** for technical advice.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 			<h2>Synthetic cloning and phi29 amplification as a new safety standard</h2>
 <p>
-Generating large collection of biological parts requires processing large number of DNA constructs. Moreover one of the primary goals of the collections is sharing parts e.g. sending to researchers or to iGEM teams. To share parts is is obligatory to amplify DNA via transforming DNA to living cells. Some of the construct may be pathogenic.  Our team last Some of the parts may be newly synthesized parts or natural yet not fully tested. Those parts are potentially hazardous. Moreover GMO bacteria can escape to the environment. We developed a safe techniques of cloning and handling large collection of DNA parts without use of any living cells making it safe to researchers and the environment.
+Generating large collection of biological parts requires processing large number of DNA constructs. Moreover one of the primary goals of the collections is sharing parts e.g. sending to researchers or to iGEM teams. To share parts is is obligatory to amplify DNA via transforming DNA to living cells. Some of the construct send to collection may increase pathogenicity - especially when transformed to E.Coli strain lacking particular required expression regulatory elements (e.g. repressor like LacI). Some of the parts may be newly synthesized parts or natural yet not fully tested. Those parts are potentially hazardous. Moreover GMO bacteria can escape to the environment. We developed a safe techniques of cloning and handling large collection of DNA parts without use of any living cells making it safe to researchers and the environment.
 </p>
 <p>
 <h2>Safe storing and sharing of biological parts</h2>
-We used phi29 rolling circle amplification to amplify DNA from the distribution. It is fast. We managed to get lots of DNA in 2 hours. Protocol and experimental results <a href="url">here</a>. It is safe to use with pathogenic ad toxic genes. We would recommend it to everyone who works with collection of parts that are potentially dangerous. Also to everyone who value time.
+We used phi29 rolling circle amplification to amplify DNA from the distribution. It performs rolling circle amplification of the circular plasmids, has high fidelity and procesivity. We managed to get lots of DNA in 2 hours. Protocol and experimental results <a href="url">****here****</a>. It is safe to use with pathogenic ad toxic genes. We would recommend it to everyone who works with collection of parts that are potentially dangerous. Also to everyone who value time.
 <p>
 </p>
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 <li> This opens up a possibility of wet lab experiments without creation of genetically modified organisms, when it is not necessary.</li>
 </ul>
-Want to perform cell-free cloning? See <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Warsaw/SyntheticCloning/SyntheticCloning">here</a> for technical advice.
+Want to perform cell-free cloning? See <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Warsaw/SyntheticCloning/SyntheticCloning">****here****</a> for technical advice.
 <br /><br />