Team:KULeuven/Modeling

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(25 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 96: Line 96:
</ul></li>
</ul></li>
-
<li class="on"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Project">Project</a>
+
<li class="off"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Description">Project</a>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="#"></a></li>
<li><a href="#"></a></li>
-
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Project">Summary</a></li>
+
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Description">Description</a></li>
-
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Details">Extended</a><li>
+
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Modeling" style="border-bottom:2px solid #000; color:#000;">Modeling</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Modeling" style="border-bottom:2px solid #000; color:#000;">Modeling</a></li>
 +
                <li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Thermodynamics">Thermodynamics</a></li>
 +
                <li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Applications">Applications</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Biobricks">Biobricks</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Biobricks">Biobricks</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Notebook">Notebook</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Notebook">Notebook</a></li>
 +
                <li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Results">Results</a></li>
</ul></li>
</ul></li>
Line 124: Line 126:
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Ethics">Ethics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Ethics">Ethics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Safety">Safety</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Safety">Safety</a></li>
 +
                <li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Law&Patents">Law&Patents</a></li>
</ul></li>
</ul></li>
Line 144: Line 147:
<div id="contentbox" style="text-align:justify;">
<div id="contentbox" style="text-align:justify;">
-
<div id="modeling_submenu"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Modeling" style="color:#000; border-bottom:2px solid #000;">overview</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Freeze">Freeze</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Antifreeze">Antifreeze</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Death">Cell Death</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Reference">reference</a></div>
+
<div id="modeling_submenu"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Modeling" style="color:#000; border-bottom:2px solid #000;">overview</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Freeze">Freeze</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Antifreeze">Antifreeze</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Death">Cell Death</a></div>
<br><br>
<br><br>
Line 150: Line 153:
<br><h2>1. Description of the whole system</h2>
<br><h2>1. Description of the whole system</h2>
-
Lactose induces the freeze system, resulting in the production of the ice nucleating protein (INP). In addition, lactose will repress the antifreeze system, preventing the formation of the antifreeze protein (AFP). On the other hand, L-arabinose is the inducing compound of the antifreeze system and the repressing compound of the freeze system. Upon application in the environment at low temperatures, a cell death mechanism will kill off the cells.  <br><br>
+
To predict and optimize the behaviour of E.D. Frosti, we constructed a model to mathematical describe the biological system. The system can be divided into three subsystems, representing the freeze, antifreeze and cell death mechanism of the bacterial cell. Lactose will induce the freeze system, resulting in the production of the ice nucleating protein (INP). In addition, lactose will repress the antifreeze system, preventing the formation of the antifreeze protein (AFP). On the other hand, L-arabinose is the inducing compound of the antifreeze system and the repressing compound of the freeze system. Upon application in the environment, a cell death mechanism will kill the cells when low temperatures are applied. We designed one model for the whole system and 3 models for 3 subsystems. The 3 subsystems are antifreeze, freeze and cell death. For more information about these 3 subsystems, we refer to the extended <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Details"> project description</a> and the 3 modelling pages: <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Freeze"> freeze</a>, <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Antifreeze"> antifreeze</a> and <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Death">cell death</a>.  <br><br>
-
To make predictions for the E.D-Frosti system, a structured segregated model is designed in Simbiology. A graphical representation of the model was build in the block diagram editor. Afterwards reaction equations and parameters were added to mathematically describe the biological system. For the reactions, a PDF with ordinary differential equations (ODE) is created [13]. There are in total three different kinetic equations we used in the model: Hill equation [14], Mass equation, Assimiliation reaction. For the parameters, a PDF with parameter values is given below. Also for every subsystem, there are PDF’s with ODE’s. However the equations and parameters used for the full model, should be the most accurate. <br><br>
+
To make predictions for the E.D. Frosti system, a structured segregated model is designed in the MATLAB <a href="http://www.mathworks.nl/products/simbiology/index.html"> Simbiology Toolbox</a> . The kinetic actions (transcription, translation, complexation, ...) that take place in the subsystems can be described by Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) like Mass-Action laws, Hill Kinetic laws,<a href="http://www.inrets.fr/ur/lte/publications/publications-pdf/Maurin-publi/Hill-Goutelle,MMet%20+.pdf "> [1]</a> and so on. An extensive search for parameters involved in these ODEs has resulted in the discovery of almost all necessary quantities for the simulations. To summarize the model, we made a PDF-file containing all the ODEs involved in modeling the subsystem, and a file with a clear overview of the used parameters <a href="https://2008.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Software/Simbiology2LaTeX">[2]</a>. <br><br>
-
We designed one model for the whole system and 3 models for 3 subsystems. The 3 subsystems are antifreeze, freeze and cell death. For more information about these 3 subsystems, we refer to the extended <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Details"> project description</a> and the 3 modelling pages: <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Freeze"> freeze</a>, <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Antifreeze"> antifreeze</a> and <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Death">cell death</a>.
+
<center>
-
<br><br>
+
-
FULL MODEL SCHEME.JPG
+
-
<br><br>
+
 +
<img src="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/celldeath_scheme.jpg"><br><br>
 +
</center>
<br><h2>2. Full Model </h2>
<br><h2>2. Full Model </h2>
-
There are in total 5 different kinetic equations we used in the model
 
-
Transcription equation
 
-
For most promoters, hill kinetics is used, it is a way of quantitatively describing cooperative binding processes, it was developed for hemoglobin in 1913. A Hill coefficient (n) is a measure for the cooperativity.
 
-
Translation equation
 
-
RNA degradation
 
-
Protein degration
 
-
Assimiliation
 
-
<br><br>
 
-
FULL MODEL FIGURE.PNG
 
-
<br><br>
 
-
Click here to download the full model (FULL MODEL.SBPROJ) <br><br>
 
-
<br><h2>3. Simulation tests</h2>
+
<center>
-
Different amounts of lactose and arabinose are used to check the efficiency of the model. The results reveal that the production rate of AFP and CeaB are much higher than that of INP formation, for example, the difference between the concentrations of AFP and INP can reach 1015 in Fig. 1. In this figure the amounts for lactose/arabinose are taken 1/1.<br><br>
+
<img src="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/full_model.jpg" border="0"><br><br>
-
The main reason for the difference in protein production is the formation of LuxR-AHL complex. This complex stimulates AFP production and inhibits INP production. The assimilation reaction is a fast reaction compared to other reactions in the system. Therefore the rate of AFP production is much higher than the rate of INP production also the inhibition of AFP production is much lower than the inhibition of INP production. The dual inhibition system enlarges the difference in reaction rates, because it works at two sides.<br><br>
+
</center>
-
To stimulate the INP production, we can increase the amount of lactose, e.g. 100 for lactose and 1 for arabinose (Fig.2). As a result, the INP production increases by 1014 when the time interval is 100 seconds in stead of 1 second! This is a very small increase of production compared to increase of stimulus lactose.
+
<a href="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/full_model.zip">Click here to download the full model</a><br><br>
-
<br><br>
+
-
To improve the system, it would be better to use a more symmetric system, especially because we are working with a dual inhibition system which enlarges the differences between the two parallel subsystems: freeze and antifreeze.
+
<a href="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/kinetic_parameters.pdf"><img src="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/pdf_icon.jpg"> Kinetic parameters</a><br><br>
-
The previous simulation is not a problem for the proper working of the system. We never want to create AFP and INP at the same time. The only disadvantage of such an assymetrical system is the much higher amount of lactose compared to arabinose which will be recquired to produce INP.<br><br>
+
 +
<a href="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/reference.pdf"><img src="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/pdf_icon.jpg"> Reference</a>
-
FIG1.JPG<br><br>
+
<br><h2>3. Simulation tests</h2>
 +
 
 +
Simulations with different initial amounts of lactose and arabinose were done to check the efficiency of the dual inhibition system. When both arabinose and lactose are present, AFP production as well as INP production should be inhibited. However, the results reveal that there is no inhibition of AFP when the concentration of lactose and arabinose are both set to 1. The production rates of AFP and CeaB are much higher than that of INP formation (Figure 1). The main reason for the difference in protein production is the formation of LuxR-AHL complex, which is a fast reaction compared to other reactions in the system. The LuxR-AHL complex stimulates AFP production and inhibits INP production. Therefore, the rate of AFP production is much higher than the rate of INP production. In addition, the inhibition of AFP production is much lower than the inhibition of INP production.<br><br>
 +
 
 +
The dual inhibition system can be improved by further parameter optimization or structural system changes based on simulations by the model. At the moment, this problem has no effect on the proper working of the E.D. Frosti system, which is the production of AFP or INP when one stimulus is present. We never want to create AFP and INP at the same time.<br><br>
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
 
 +
<img src="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/figure01_overview.jpg"><br><br>
Figure 1: amount of lactose-arabinose  1-1, huge difference between production of AFP and INP<br><br>
Figure 1: amount of lactose-arabinose  1-1, huge difference between production of AFP and INP<br><br>
-
FIG2.JPG
+
<img src="http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~igemwiki/images/modeling/figure02_overview.jpg"><br><br>
-
<br><br>
+
Figure 2: amount of lactose-arabinose 100-1 after 100 seconds <br><br>
-
Figure 2: amount of lactose-arabinose 100-1 after 100 second <br><br>
+
-
<br><h2>4. Sensitivity Analysis and parameter scan</h2>
+
</center>
-
In our works, sensitivity analysis (SA) is used to examine how the activity of the gene expression in the output of each model can be attributed to different kinetic parameters in the inputs of the model. We can also use this technique to determine the effects of changing variable in the models. The results of sensitivity analysis for each model are shown in subsystem pages.
+
<h2>4. Sensitivity Analysis and parameter scan</h2>
-
<br><br>
+
 
 +
Sensitivity analysis (SA) is used to examine how the activity of the gene expression in the output of each model can be attributed to different kinetic parameters in the inputs of the model. We can also use this technique to determine the effects of changing variable in the model. The results of sensitivity analysis for each submodel are shown in the subsystem pages.
 +
<br><br><br><br>
-
In the model of cell death, we do the simulation test with each parameter changing within the certain range with the value incremented by the certain interval.
 
-
<br><br>
 
-
<br><h2>5. Kinetic Constants</h2>
 
-
KINETIC PARAMETER.PDF
 
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 12:45, 27 October 2011

KULeuven iGEM 2011

close
overview     Freeze     Antifreeze     Cell Death


Modeling Overview


1. Description of the whole system

To predict and optimize the behaviour of E.D. Frosti, we constructed a model to mathematical describe the biological system. The system can be divided into three subsystems, representing the freeze, antifreeze and cell death mechanism of the bacterial cell. Lactose will induce the freeze system, resulting in the production of the ice nucleating protein (INP). In addition, lactose will repress the antifreeze system, preventing the formation of the antifreeze protein (AFP). On the other hand, L-arabinose is the inducing compound of the antifreeze system and the repressing compound of the freeze system. Upon application in the environment, a cell death mechanism will kill the cells when low temperatures are applied. We designed one model for the whole system and 3 models for 3 subsystems. The 3 subsystems are antifreeze, freeze and cell death. For more information about these 3 subsystems, we refer to the extended project description and the 3 modelling pages: freeze, antifreeze and cell death.

To make predictions for the E.D. Frosti system, a structured segregated model is designed in the MATLAB Simbiology Toolbox . The kinetic actions (transcription, translation, complexation, ...) that take place in the subsystems can be described by Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) like Mass-Action laws, Hill Kinetic laws, [1] and so on. An extensive search for parameters involved in these ODEs has resulted in the discovery of almost all necessary quantities for the simulations. To summarize the model, we made a PDF-file containing all the ODEs involved in modeling the subsystem, and a file with a clear overview of the used parameters [2].




2. Full Model



Click here to download the full model

Kinetic parameters

Reference

3. Simulation tests

Simulations with different initial amounts of lactose and arabinose were done to check the efficiency of the dual inhibition system. When both arabinose and lactose are present, AFP production as well as INP production should be inhibited. However, the results reveal that there is no inhibition of AFP when the concentration of lactose and arabinose are both set to 1. The production rates of AFP and CeaB are much higher than that of INP formation (Figure 1). The main reason for the difference in protein production is the formation of LuxR-AHL complex, which is a fast reaction compared to other reactions in the system. The LuxR-AHL complex stimulates AFP production and inhibits INP production. Therefore, the rate of AFP production is much higher than the rate of INP production. In addition, the inhibition of AFP production is much lower than the inhibition of INP production.

The dual inhibition system can be improved by further parameter optimization or structural system changes based on simulations by the model. At the moment, this problem has no effect on the proper working of the E.D. Frosti system, which is the production of AFP or INP when one stimulus is present. We never want to create AFP and INP at the same time.



Figure 1: amount of lactose-arabinose 1-1, huge difference between production of AFP and INP



Figure 2: amount of lactose-arabinose 100-1 after 100 seconds

4. Sensitivity Analysis and parameter scan

Sensitivity analysis (SA) is used to examine how the activity of the gene expression in the output of each model can be attributed to different kinetic parameters in the inputs of the model. We can also use this technique to determine the effects of changing variable in the model. The results of sensitivity analysis for each submodel are shown in the subsystem pages.