Team:NYC Software/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(Prototype team page) |
(We have addressed and met all of 2011 iGEM competition's safety guidelines.) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
- | + | {{:Team:NYC_Software/Templates/nav}} | |
+ | {{:Team:NYC_Software/Templates/css}} | ||
- | + | <html> | |
+ | <html lang="en"> | ||
+ | <head> | ||
+ | <meta charset="utf-8"> | ||
+ | <title>NYC-iGEM software</title> | ||
+ | <meta name "description" content="nyc-igem" /> | ||
+ | <meta name="keywords" content="css3, igem" /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </head> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <body> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div id="container"> | ||
+ | <h3>NYC Software Safety Page</h3> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <h4>1. Would any of our software project ideas raise safety issues of any kind?</h4> | ||
+ | No, none of our software projects raise research, public, or environmental safety issues of any kind. | ||
+ | <h4>2. Do any of the BioBricks or devices we've made raise safety issues?</h4> | ||
+ | No, none of the scripts we've developed or any of the projects we've participated in raise safety issues of any kind. | ||
+ | <h4>3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at our institution?</h4> | ||
+ | Yes, there is. The Cornell Med biosafety board doesn't know about our project. | ||
+ | <h4>4. Do we have any other ideas to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions?</h4> | ||
+ | As a software track team of 2011 iGEM competition it's our goal to design good open source tools that would allow everyone to engineer and understand biology more efficiently. We believe that by making good software tools and data sets available to the broader spectrum of people we can promote standardized practices and open communities to foster safer and more positive synthetic biology. And owing to the engineering and data driven nature of the field of synthetic biology itself we believe that it is crucial to push for open standards tools and data to ensure its safe practices in the future. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </body> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{:Team:NYC_Software/Templates/boxes}} |
Revision as of 15:35, 17 August 2011
This is a template page. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS.
You are provided with this team page template with which to start the iGEM season. You may choose to personalize it to fit your team but keep the same "look." Or you may choose to take your team wiki to a different level and design your own wiki. You can find some examples HERE.
You MUST have a team description page, a project abstract, a complete project description, a lab notebook, and a safety page. PLEASE keep all of your pages within your teams namespace.
You can write a background of your team here. Give us a background of your team, the members, etc. Or tell us more about something of your choosing. | |
Tell us more about your project. Give us background. Use this is the abstract of your project. Be descriptive but concise (1-2 paragraphs) | |
Team Example |
Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Notebook | Safety | Attributions |
---|
NYC Software Safety Page
1. Would any of our software project ideas raise safety issues of any kind?
No, none of our software projects raise research, public, or environmental safety issues of any kind.2. Do any of the BioBricks or devices we've made raise safety issues?
No, none of the scripts we've developed or any of the projects we've participated in raise safety issues of any kind.3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at our institution?
Yes, there is. The Cornell Med biosafety board doesn't know about our project.4. Do we have any other ideas to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions?
As a software track team of 2011 iGEM competition it's our goal to design good open source tools that would allow everyone to engineer and understand biology more efficiently. We believe that by making good software tools and data sets available to the broader spectrum of people we can promote standardized practices and open communities to foster safer and more positive synthetic biology. And owing to the engineering and data driven nature of the field of synthetic biology itself we believe that it is crucial to push for open standards tools and data to ensure its safe practices in the future.
Abstract
We studied genes responsible for radiation resistance in Deinococcus and E. coli using whole genome analysis to compare frequencies of certain D.rad-related genes in experimental genomes.
Toolsets
The only way for the new field like synthetic biology to grow is to make it easier for new entrants. We contribute to the field by developing tools that ease biobrick project design and allow iGEMers to take to the wetlab more quickly.
Tools
.
Primer Design