Team:Paris Liliane Bettencourt/Notebook/2011/08/02/
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Adrien Lhomme-Duchadeuil) |
(→Adrien Lhomme-Duchadeuil) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|tube 1: poration control no DNA (12,5 kV: ARC) | |tube 1: poration control no DNA (12,5 kV: ARC) | ||
- | *CTL < | + | *CTL <power>+</power>: carpet |
*CTL <sub>-</sub> with Cm (5 and 30 µg/mL): none | *CTL <sub>-</sub> with Cm (5 and 30 µg/mL): none | ||
*CTL <sub>-</sub> with TetR (5 and 12,5 µg/mL): carpet | *CTL <sub>-</sub> with TetR (5 and 12,5 µg/mL): carpet |
Revision as of 10:34, 2 August 2011
Adrien Lhomme-Duchadeuil
First, an estimation of how much antibiotics is necessary for Bacillus subtilis. Appropriate concentration in antibiotics
- Chloramphemicol : 5-10 µg/mL
- Spec : 50-100 µg/mL
- Tetracyclin: 25 µg/mL
- Kanamycin: 5µg/mL
- Evm(?): 1µg/mL + 25 µg/mL lincomycin (Verify spelling)
Results of electroporation: IT WORKED after three trials!
- Positive control worked
- Negative controls didn't show any colonies except when put in the presence of TetR (qty:12,5 µg/mL or 5µg/mL) which was insufficient => I will re-plate the improbable survivors on plates of different tetracyclin concentrations to test resistance.
- Cm resistant strain have survived in low quantities at both 30 and 5 µg/mL of antibiotics
- It seems that even cuvettes that had an electric arc were able to produce a couple colonies, which means that it doesn't anihilate all the bacteria.
- To come: protocol and table of results
tube 1: poration control no DNA (12,5 kV: ARC)
| tube 2: poration control no DNA (10kV: OK)
| tube 3: pHM3::TetR (12,5 kV: OK)
| tube 4: pHM3::TetR (10 kV: OK)
| tube5: pHM3::TetR (12,5 kV: ARC)
| tube 6: pHM3::TetR (10 kV: OK)
|
tube 7: S12::Cm (12,5 kV: ARC)
| tube 8: S12::Cm (10 kV: OK)
| tube 9: S12::Cm (12,5 kV: OK)
| tube 10: S12::Cm (10 kV: OK)
| CTL --: no bacteria
|