"
Team:Lyon-INSA-ENS/Safety/Suggestions
From 2011.igem.org
(a) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | <br/> <br/> | ||
| + | <br/> <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <p style="line-height:1.5em ;"> | ||
The debate <B>“Nuclear technology and Genetically Modified Organisms : Can scientists keep control?” </B> we organised aroused several safety issues and suggestions that have been proposed to tackle with them. | The debate <B>“Nuclear technology and Genetically Modified Organisms : Can scientists keep control?” </B> we organised aroused several safety issues and suggestions that have been proposed to tackle with them. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| - | <p style="line-height:1.5em"> | + | <br/> <br/> |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <p style="line-height:1.5em"> | ||
First, the standardisation of parts makes it simpler to use and share for researchers, but also for malign or careless uses. All the informations related to the iGEM projects are freely available on the net without any access control. It has been evoked that, with these informations, anyone with basic microbiology knowledge could try to build his own bio-weapon (like people nowadays can find the recipe to create their own bomb on the net) or, on a safety point of view, could misuse a part and accidentally harm people or environment. Yet, would it be a better solution to restrict access to iGEM members ? It would mean to give up on the valuable “open source” model, where everyone’s experience contributes to enhancing our knowledge, including the knowledge about the safety of the parts (what should and should not be done with a part, what precautions you must take, what unexpected behaviour has been observed...). Concealing the information would not prevent people from accessing it illegally, as shown by the numerous web security breaches that are regularly reported. This means that synthetic biology should be careful about safety issues and discussions or reflections concerning the “open source” should not be overlooked. | First, the standardisation of parts makes it simpler to use and share for researchers, but also for malign or careless uses. All the informations related to the iGEM projects are freely available on the net without any access control. It has been evoked that, with these informations, anyone with basic microbiology knowledge could try to build his own bio-weapon (like people nowadays can find the recipe to create their own bomb on the net) or, on a safety point of view, could misuse a part and accidentally harm people or environment. Yet, would it be a better solution to restrict access to iGEM members ? It would mean to give up on the valuable “open source” model, where everyone’s experience contributes to enhancing our knowledge, including the knowledge about the safety of the parts (what should and should not be done with a part, what precautions you must take, what unexpected behaviour has been observed...). Concealing the information would not prevent people from accessing it illegally, as shown by the numerous web security breaches that are regularly reported. This means that synthetic biology should be careful about safety issues and discussions or reflections concerning the “open source” should not be overlooked. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 44: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> <br/> | <br/> <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="margin: 0 auto; width:255px; border : black 1px solid;"> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fd/Affiche-caf%C3%A9-scientifique.jpg" width="250px" /> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 14 July 2011
The debate “Nuclear technology and Genetically Modified Organisms : Can scientists keep control?” we organised aroused several safety issues and suggestions that have been proposed to tackle with them.
First, the standardisation of parts makes it simpler to use and share for researchers, but also for malign or careless uses. All the informations related to the iGEM projects are freely available on the net without any access control. It has been evoked that, with these informations, anyone with basic microbiology knowledge could try to build his own bio-weapon (like people nowadays can find the recipe to create their own bomb on the net) or, on a safety point of view, could misuse a part and accidentally harm people or environment. Yet, would it be a better solution to restrict access to iGEM members ? It would mean to give up on the valuable “open source” model, where everyone’s experience contributes to enhancing our knowledge, including the knowledge about the safety of the parts (what should and should not be done with a part, what precautions you must take, what unexpected behaviour has been observed...). Concealing the information would not prevent people from accessing it illegally, as shown by the numerous web security breaches that are regularly reported. This means that synthetic biology should be careful about safety issues and discussions or reflections concerning the “open source” should not be overlooked.
General safety issues about GMOs have also been mentionned, and the reasons why the general public considers them unsafe. The quick development of plant GMOs was, in the eyes of the general public, a search for immediate profit with few concerns about safety and ethics and moreover very few efforts of communication have been made, which has created a fear about them. We noticed that generally, GM bacteria are widely used in medicine and food industry, but are less known by the public who is less scared about them. Synthetic biology should avoid such a mistake, by communicating to the public before releasing new devices, and ensuring that they will be accepted by a distrust public.
