Team:Queens Canada/Project/Intro

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(39 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
</head>
</head>
 +
<style>
 +
 +
#space1{width:165px; float:left; background-color: #F5F5F5; margin-left:10px; padding: 10px; margin-top:8px; text-align:center;}
 +
#space2{width:166px; float:left; background-color: #F5F5F5; margin-left:4px; padding: 10px; margin-top:8px; text-align:center;}
 +
#space3{width:166px; float:left; background-color: #F5F5F5; margin-left:4px; padding: 10px; margin-top:8px; text-align:center;}
 +
#space4{width:165px; float:left; background-color: #F5F5F5; margin-left:4px; padding: 10px; margin-top:8px; text-align:center;}
 +
 +
</style>
 +
 +
 +
<div id="rightcontent">
 +
<img align="left" style="margin-bottom:0px; width: 755px; margin-top:-3px; padding:0;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a4/Queens_CanadaTitleIntroduction.png" usemap="#headermap" alt="Queen's">
 +
 +
 +
 +
</div>
Line 22: Line 38:
</head>
</head>
-
<div id="rightcontent"> <p><p>
 
-
<h3red>Project Description</h3red> <p>
 
-
<regulartext>The nematode worm C. elegans does not normally chemotax toward environmental pollutants like naphthalene, toluene, phenol, and DDT. However, certain G-protein coupled receptors found in H. sapiens, M. musculus, and R. norvegicus are agonized by these compounds. Our main goal is to import these foreign GPCRs into the worm in the hopes of observing novel chemotaxis behaviour. Secondarily, we will design a field bioassay based on our C. elegans chemotaxis system. We envision two populations of worms expressing different types of fluorescent protein. One population will be repulsed by toxic compounds, and one will chemotax toward those compounds. The presence of toxicity in a soil sample would be indicated by a ring of one type of fluorescence forming around the sample. <p> </regulartext>
 
-
<regulartext> Finally, we will experiment with the natural relationship between C. elegans and the bacterium E. faecium. This bacterium is known to colonize the intestine of C. elegans without causing mortality. E. faecium can also degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (such as naphthalene). We predict that coupling E. faecium to our transgenic worm will increase the tolerance of the worm to oil contaminants and provide it with a way to biodegrade those contaminants. </regulartext>
+
<div id="space1">
 +
<regulartext>
 +
    <span class="classred"><a href="#model">model organism      </a></span>    </regulartext>
</div>
</div>
 +
<div id="space2">
 +
<regulartext>
 +
    <span class="classred"><a href="#chassis">eukaryotic chassis      </a></span>    </regulartext>
 +
</div>
-
<div id="rightcontent"> <p><p>
+
<div id="space3">
-
<h3red>Safety Proposal</h3red> <p>
+
<regulartext>
<regulartext>
-
The QGEM 2011 project is a safe endeavour in many respects. The nematode worm C. elegans, our chassis organism,  is non-pathogenic. Working with C. elegans carries very little risk to researchers, and BSL-1 level laboratory clearance is satisfactory for work with this organism1. Furthermore, microinjection of extrachromosomal arrays reduces the worm’s fitness. So, if a transgenic worm were to escape into the outside environment, it would be unlikely to have a selective advantage over wild-type worms. Our biobricks do not provide the worm with any selective advantages. In fact, they reduce fitness by forcing the worm to chemotax toward toxic chemicals. We are also designing an RNAi-based kill switch to ensure the worm does not live to reproductive age.
+
    <span class="classred"><a href="#GPCRs">GPCRs      </a></span>    </regulartext>
-
<p>
+
</div>
-
A component of this year’s project involves working with the organism E. faecium. This bacterium is capable of colonizing the intestine of C. elegans and breaking down polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. E. faecium is a natural component of the human gut microflora. However, this organism can also act as a human pathogen and requires BSL-2 level laboratory clearance2. MSDS guidelines will be strictly observed when working with this bacterium in the appropriate laboratory. All work done with E. faecium will be for proof of concept purposes, to investigate the potential of manipulating the natural relationship between E. faecium and C. elegans. We have no intention of releasing a worm loaded with bacteria into the environment.
+
-
<p>
+
-
As a machine designed to chemotax toward toxic compounds, our organism poses little threat to the environment. By contrast, our organism could prove beneficial to the environment, and by extension, human health. All our biobricks target intracelluar pathways within C. elegans. We judge it unlikely that a mutation in this kind of biobrick would result in harm to humans or the environment. Mutations in our biobricks would lead to deactivation of our imported GPCRs, and  we would not expect this to alter the ability of the worm to survive and out-compete other organisms. Overall, C. elegans can be considered safer than E. coli, the standard synthetic biology chassis, because the worm is not capable of horizontal gene transfer.
+
-
<p>
+
-
Dr. Ian Chin-Sang and Kenton Ko are two of the team’s Faculty Advisors this year, and have provided the team with lab space in which we conduct all of our wet work. They are all members of the Queen’s Biohazards Committee and have ensured that we work within the appropriate biosafety regulations. Furthermore, all of our team members have undergone WHMIS and radiation  safety training, as safety is one of our top priorities.
+
-
</regulartext>  
+
<div id="space4">
 +
<regulartext>
 +
    <span class="classred"><a href="#wormGPCRs">worm GPCRs      </a></span>    </regulartext>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
 +
<div id="rightcontenttext">
 +
<a name="model"> </a>
 +
<h3red> <i>Caenorhabditis elegans:</i> A Model Organism</b> </h3red><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext><i>C. elegans </i> has been a long standing model organism for multicellular eukaryotes due to its simplistic structure and features which, despite being base in nature, provide highly analogous representations of biological processes in other model organisms. Generally, model organisms must have a set of common traits which allow for ease of use and observation such as rapid maturation and small growth cycles, small size, availability, and tractability. <i>C. elegans</i> is a particularly attractive model organism not only for its adherence to the above criteria but due to several other factors as well. </regulartext> <p>
 +
 +
<regulartext> <i>C. elegans</i> is a transparent, nonparasitic nematode approximately 1mm in length and is found in most temperate soil climates. It is easily sustained in the lab through use of agar plates or liquid cultures at laboratory temperatures.  It can feed solely on <i>E. coli</i>, and is hence cheaply cultivated. Its transparency allows for the study of cellular differentiation and tissue mapping via fluorescing proteins. The rapidity with which <i>C.elegans</i> reproduces and the large number of offspring generated per hermaphrodite leads to the production of high numbers of offspring in a short amount of time.  </regulartext> <p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>A population of <i>C. elegans </i> is comprised of two sexes: hermaphrodites and males, the former being predominant in any given population. Because of a lack of male-hermaphroditic mating, the genotypes of worms produced in culture remain generally homogenous. While the life span of a worm can be anywhere from 2-3 weeks in length, the worms themselves reach maturation within 3 days. At this point, all expression patterns in their cells are considered adult and the number of somatic cells within the worm remains at a constant of 959 for hermaphrodites and 1031 for males.  The expected results of genetic construct microinjection can be detected and  tested at this point. </regulartext> <p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>The completely sequenced genome of <i>C. elegans</i> contributes to the organism’s status as a model for genetic engineering study, and as a result, means genetic manipulation techniques within the worm are well tested. Methods of gene manipulation by injection of plasmid vectors into the gonads are standard, as is RNAi gene knockout, for example. Furthermore, transgenes from higher organisms such as humans have been successfully expressed within <i>C. elegans</i>. This was proven with the insertion of human GPCRs (G-protein Coupled Receptors) into <i> C. elegans </i> where interactions between the human receptor and the worm G-protein were successful.  These findings led QGEM 2011 to harness the potential of <i>C. elegans</i> through genetic engineering. </regulartext> <p>
 +
 +
 +
<div id="goright">
 +
<span class="classred"><a href="#top">back to top</a><span>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div id="rightcontenttext">
 +
<a name="chassis"> </a>
 +
<h3red> <i> Caenorhabditis elegans: </i> Eukaryotic Chassis</h3red><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext><span class="classredt"><a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Queens-Canada/full">QGEM 2010</a><span> was the first iGEM team to introduce <i> C. elegans</i> as a chassis for genetic engineering in the iGEM competition. Their project focused on the creation of a <i>C. elegans</i> toolkit whereby other teams may easily perform feats of genetic engineering with the worm. This year, our focus was to build upon that concept, demonstrating the use of having a eukaryotic multicellular organism as a functional iGEM chassis and also a bioremediation tool, among other goals. </regulartext><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>While the benefits of working with simpler prokaryotic organisms such as <i>E. coli</i> are not disputed, using eukaryotes as a chassis for genetic engineering has significant advantages as well. As a model eukaryotic organism, succesful manipulation of the <i>C.elegans</i> genome would quantify similar exploits using larger organisms. The portability between the genes of <i>C. elegans</i> and genes of other model organisms is high and, as is seen with the successful  insertion of human GPCR transgenes into <i>C. elegans</i>, is proof that despite a largely divergent evolutionary pathways, eukaryotic systems share much in basic biological interactions. By utilizing a eukaryotic chassis, we show that other higher organisms may be manipulated similarly and that the possibilities of genetic engineering are truly endless. Already <i>C. elegans </i> has been instrumental in <span class="classredt"><a href="http://130.15.90.245/">the study of aging and cancer development in humans</a><span>. </regulartext><p>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
<div id="goright">
 +
<span class="classred"><a href="#top">back to top</a><span>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div id="rightcontenttext">
 +
<a name="GPCRs"> </a>
 +
<h3red> G-Protein Coupled Receptors</h3red><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>G-protein Coupled receptors are seven-transmembrane domain receptors (also known as serpentine, 7TM, or G-protein-linked receptors) that bind ligands extracellularly, resulting in the activation of a signal transduction pathway within the cell upon ligand binding. They are sensory receptors which may bind lipids, peptides, light sensitive molecules, odour molecules, pheromones, hormones, ions, or neurotransmitters.  GPCRs exist only in eukaryotic organisms where they affect many physiological processes including the visual and olefactory senses, behavioural and immune system regulation, autonomic nervous system transmission, and cell density sensing. </regulartext><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>These receptors are integral membrane proteins with helical domains that span through the cell membrane. While the extracellular domain is available to bind an agonist or antagonist (ligand), the intracellular domain is coupled to a Guanine Nucleotide Binding Protein (G-Protein). The G-protein acts as a molecular switch, where the binding of GTP (guanosine triphosphate) represents the switch being “on” and the binding of GDP represents the switch being “off”.</regulartext><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>The consequences of the switch being “on” or “off” relates to what occurs within the cell. The family of G-proteins which bind to GPCRs are termed Heterotrimeric G-proteins and are comprised of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits.  In response to a conformational change in the GPCR, which results after a ligand binds to the GPCR, the G-protein exchanges a GDP for a GTP and then dissociates from the cell membrane to initiate a signal cascade within the cell, resulting in a biological response.</regulartext><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>A GPCR is activated when a ligand binds to its extracellular domain. This activation induces a conformational change in the receptor and allows it to act as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) which trades GDP for GTP on the Gα subunit of the G-protein. The Gα subunit may then dissociate from the Gβγ dimer, which anchors the G-protein to the membrane, and the GPCR to affect intracellular signalling proteins or target functional proteins directly depending on the α subunit type. Once dissociated, a new Gα subunit with bound GTP binds to the Gβγ subunit, and hence, signalling via GPCR may continue.  The process is seen in the figure below.</regulartext>
 +
 +
<regulartext>Two main signal transduction pathways are activated by GPCRs: the Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) pathway or the Phosphatidylinositol Pathway, both of which act through other molecules to affect biological processes.</regulartext>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
<div id="goright">
 +
<span class="classred"><a href="#top">back to top</a><span>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
 +
<div id="rightcontenttext">
 +
<a name="wormGPCRs"> </a>
 +
<h3red> GPCRs in <i>C. elegans</i></h3red><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>In <i>C. elegans</i>, a variety of behaviours are regulated by the chemosensory system where volatile and water soluble chemical signals in the environment are detected primarily through neurons in the amphid.  These signals are associated with food, other organisms, or danger and can cause responses such as chemotaxis, changes in motility, rapid avoidance, and entry into or exit from the alternative dauer developmental stage. The amphid chemosensory organ of <i>C.elegans</i> is comprised of eleven neurons, all of which express a specific set GPCRs which bind distinct attractants, repellents, and pheromones. Within <i>C. elegans</i>, 500-1000 GPCRs are expressed in the amphid chemosensory neurons. Activation of these receptors triggers either the cGMP signal transduction pathway where cGMP acts as a secondary messenger which opens cGMP gated channels or the TRPV signal transduction pathway. </regulartext><p>
 +
 +
<regulartext>A table can be seen below which lists the GPCRs present in <i>C.elegans</i> the neurons in which they are expressed. It also shows the function of the GPCR and method of signal transduction.</regulartext><p>
 +
 +
<img align="left" style="margin-bottom:0px; width: 755px; padding:0;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/66/Queens_CanadaTable.png">
 +
 +
<regulartext>QGEM 2011 focused on utilizing the chemosensory system of <i>C.elegans</i> by expressing non-native GPCRs in neurons where a forward chemotactic response was the ultimate downstream effect of ligand binding.</regulartext>
 +
 +
 +
<div id="goright">
 +
<span class="classred"><a href="#top">back to top</a><span>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 03:54, 29 October 2011

Queen's
Caenorhabditis elegans: A Model Organism

C. elegans has been a long standing model organism for multicellular eukaryotes due to its simplistic structure and features which, despite being base in nature, provide highly analogous representations of biological processes in other model organisms. Generally, model organisms must have a set of common traits which allow for ease of use and observation such as rapid maturation and small growth cycles, small size, availability, and tractability. C. elegans is a particularly attractive model organism not only for its adherence to the above criteria but due to several other factors as well.

C. elegans is a transparent, nonparasitic nematode approximately 1mm in length and is found in most temperate soil climates. It is easily sustained in the lab through use of agar plates or liquid cultures at laboratory temperatures. It can feed solely on E. coli, and is hence cheaply cultivated. Its transparency allows for the study of cellular differentiation and tissue mapping via fluorescing proteins. The rapidity with which C.elegans reproduces and the large number of offspring generated per hermaphrodite leads to the production of high numbers of offspring in a short amount of time.

A population of C. elegans is comprised of two sexes: hermaphrodites and males, the former being predominant in any given population. Because of a lack of male-hermaphroditic mating, the genotypes of worms produced in culture remain generally homogenous. While the life span of a worm can be anywhere from 2-3 weeks in length, the worms themselves reach maturation within 3 days. At this point, all expression patterns in their cells are considered adult and the number of somatic cells within the worm remains at a constant of 959 for hermaphrodites and 1031 for males. The expected results of genetic construct microinjection can be detected and tested at this point.

The completely sequenced genome of C. elegans contributes to the organism’s status as a model for genetic engineering study, and as a result, means genetic manipulation techniques within the worm are well tested. Methods of gene manipulation by injection of plasmid vectors into the gonads are standard, as is RNAi gene knockout, for example. Furthermore, transgenes from higher organisms such as humans have been successfully expressed within C. elegans. This was proven with the insertion of human GPCRs (G-protein Coupled Receptors) into C. elegans where interactions between the human receptor and the worm G-protein were successful. These findings led QGEM 2011 to harness the potential of C. elegans through genetic engineering.

Caenorhabditis elegans: Eukaryotic Chassis

QGEM 2010 was the first iGEM team to introduce C. elegans as a chassis for genetic engineering in the iGEM competition. Their project focused on the creation of a C. elegans toolkit whereby other teams may easily perform feats of genetic engineering with the worm. This year, our focus was to build upon that concept, demonstrating the use of having a eukaryotic multicellular organism as a functional iGEM chassis and also a bioremediation tool, among other goals.

While the benefits of working with simpler prokaryotic organisms such as E. coli are not disputed, using eukaryotes as a chassis for genetic engineering has significant advantages as well. As a model eukaryotic organism, succesful manipulation of the C.elegans genome would quantify similar exploits using larger organisms. The portability between the genes of C. elegans and genes of other model organisms is high and, as is seen with the successful insertion of human GPCR transgenes into C. elegans, is proof that despite a largely divergent evolutionary pathways, eukaryotic systems share much in basic biological interactions. By utilizing a eukaryotic chassis, we show that other higher organisms may be manipulated similarly and that the possibilities of genetic engineering are truly endless. Already C. elegans has been instrumental in the study of aging and cancer development in humans.

G-Protein Coupled Receptors

G-protein Coupled receptors are seven-transmembrane domain receptors (also known as serpentine, 7TM, or G-protein-linked receptors) that bind ligands extracellularly, resulting in the activation of a signal transduction pathway within the cell upon ligand binding. They are sensory receptors which may bind lipids, peptides, light sensitive molecules, odour molecules, pheromones, hormones, ions, or neurotransmitters. GPCRs exist only in eukaryotic organisms where they affect many physiological processes including the visual and olefactory senses, behavioural and immune system regulation, autonomic nervous system transmission, and cell density sensing.

These receptors are integral membrane proteins with helical domains that span through the cell membrane. While the extracellular domain is available to bind an agonist or antagonist (ligand), the intracellular domain is coupled to a Guanine Nucleotide Binding Protein (G-Protein). The G-protein acts as a molecular switch, where the binding of GTP (guanosine triphosphate) represents the switch being “on” and the binding of GDP represents the switch being “off”.

The consequences of the switch being “on” or “off” relates to what occurs within the cell. The family of G-proteins which bind to GPCRs are termed Heterotrimeric G-proteins and are comprised of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits. In response to a conformational change in the GPCR, which results after a ligand binds to the GPCR, the G-protein exchanges a GDP for a GTP and then dissociates from the cell membrane to initiate a signal cascade within the cell, resulting in a biological response.

A GPCR is activated when a ligand binds to its extracellular domain. This activation induces a conformational change in the receptor and allows it to act as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) which trades GDP for GTP on the Gα subunit of the G-protein. The Gα subunit may then dissociate from the Gβγ dimer, which anchors the G-protein to the membrane, and the GPCR to affect intracellular signalling proteins or target functional proteins directly depending on the α subunit type. Once dissociated, a new Gα subunit with bound GTP binds to the Gβγ subunit, and hence, signalling via GPCR may continue. The process is seen in the figure below. Two main signal transduction pathways are activated by GPCRs: the Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) pathway or the Phosphatidylinositol Pathway, both of which act through other molecules to affect biological processes.

GPCRs in C. elegans

In C. elegans, a variety of behaviours are regulated by the chemosensory system where volatile and water soluble chemical signals in the environment are detected primarily through neurons in the amphid. These signals are associated with food, other organisms, or danger and can cause responses such as chemotaxis, changes in motility, rapid avoidance, and entry into or exit from the alternative dauer developmental stage. The amphid chemosensory organ of C.elegans is comprised of eleven neurons, all of which express a specific set GPCRs which bind distinct attractants, repellents, and pheromones. Within C. elegans, 500-1000 GPCRs are expressed in the amphid chemosensory neurons. Activation of these receptors triggers either the cGMP signal transduction pathway where cGMP acts as a secondary messenger which opens cGMP gated channels or the TRPV signal transduction pathway.

A table can be seen below which lists the GPCRs present in C.elegans the neurons in which they are expressed. It also shows the function of the GPCR and method of signal transduction.

QGEM 2011 focused on utilizing the chemosensory system of C.elegans by expressing non-native GPCRs in neurons where a forward chemotactic response was the ultimate downstream effect of ligand binding.