"
Team:Tokyo Tech
From 2011.igem.org
(Prototype team page) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <p>For iGEM 2010 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:</p> | ||
| + | <p>Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?</p> | ||
| + | <p>A1. For review of our applications by a local biosafety group, researcher safety, public safety and environmental safety are evaluated.<br /> | ||
| + | In this meaning, our answer is all YES.</p> | ||
| + | <p>Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,</p> | ||
| + | <p>A2.No. Our parts are of safety level one and two. We used genes which are analyzed in peer-reviewed papers.</p> | ||
| + | <p>Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?</p> | ||
| + | <p>A3. Yes</p> | ||
| + | <p>If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?</p> | ||
| + | <p>The biosafety committee of our organization accepted our applications. They think our project is legal.</p> | ||
| + | <p>Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering</p> | ||
| + | <p>A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.</p> | ||
| + | |||
<div id="box" style="width: 700px; margin-left: 137px; padding: 5px; border: 3px solid #000; background-color: #fe2b33;"> | <div id="box" style="width: 700px; margin-left: 137px; padding: 5px; border: 3px solid #000; background-color: #fe2b33;"> | ||
<div id="template" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: large; color: #f6f6f6; padding: 5px;"> | <div id="template" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: large; color: #f6f6f6; padding: 5px;"> | ||
Revision as of 03:07, 4 July 2011
For iGEM 2010 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:
Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety or environmental safety ?
A1. For review of our applications by a local biosafety group, researcher safety, public safety and environmental safety are evaluated.
In this meaning, our answer is all YES.
Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
A2.No. Our parts are of safety level one and two. We used genes which are analyzed in peer-reviewed papers.
Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
A3. Yes
If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
The biosafety committee of our organization accepted our applications. They think our project is legal.
Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering
A4.Put document number of a review sheet from the local biosafety group.
| You can write a background of your team here. Give us a background of your team, the members, etc. Or tell us more about something of your choosing. | File:Tokyo Tech logo.png 200px |
|
Tell us more about your project. Give us background. Use this as the abstract of your project. Be descriptive but concise (1-2 paragraphs) | File:Tokyo Tech team.png Your team picture |
| Team Example |
| Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Notebook | Safety | Attributions |
|---|
