Team:HKUST-Hong Kong/asm.html

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(68 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<head><title></title>
<head><title></title>
<style type="text/css">
<style type="text/css">
-
#globalWrapper { background-color: transparent; border: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; height:100%;}
+
#globalWrapper {  
-
 
+
background-image:url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/63/Bottom.jpg'); background-attachment:fixed; border: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; height:100%;}
-
#bodyContent { border: none; padding:0; margin:0; width:100%; height:100%;}
+
#footer { background-color: white; border: none; width: 620px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0;}
-
#top-section { background-color: red; height: 0px; margin: 0px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 0 !important;
+
-
padding:0; border: none; font-size: 10px;}
+
-
#p-logo { height:1px; overflow:hidden; display: none;}
+
-
#search-controls { overflow:hidden; display:block; background: none; position: absolute; top: 100px; right: 40px;}
+
-
.left-menu { width: 500px !important; display:block; margin-top:-80px; border: none; text-align: right;}
+
-
.left-menu ul { border: none; }
+
-
#menubar.right-menu { width:300px; display:block; float:left; margin-top:-80px; border: none;}
+
-
.right-menu ul { border: none; width: 300px;}
+
-
#footer-box { display: none; width: 100%; margin: -10px auto 0 auto; padding: 20px 0;}
+
-
.visualClear { display: none; }
+
-
#footer { border: none; width: 965px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0;}
+
.firstHeading { display: none;}
.firstHeading { display: none;}
-
#f-list a { color: #333; font-size: 10px;}
 
-
#f-list a:hover { color: #666;}
 
-
.printfooter { display: none; }
 
-
#footer ul { margin: 0; padding: 0;}
 
-
#footer ul li { margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; padding: 0;}
 
-
#search-controls { display:none; }
 
-
 
-
#contentSub {display: none;}
 
-
 
</style>
</style>
<style type="text/css">
<style type="text/css">
-
 
-
 
-
 
<!--
<!--
Line 44: Line 21:
-->
-->
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
p{
p{
Line 63: Line 30:
text-align: justify;
text-align: justify;
}
}
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
table{
table{
Line 75: Line 36:
</style>
</style>
 +
</head>
-
</head>
+
<table align=top style="border-collapse: collapse">
-
<body bgcolor="#A1C6B2">
+
<TR>
 +
<TH BGCOLOR="#A1C6B2">
 +
<a name=top></a>
 +
<a href=#method>How to Select</a> ·
 +
<a href=#assembly>Methods of Assembly </a> ·
 +
<a href=#component>Details of Components</a> ·
 +
<a href=#refer>References</a>
 +
<p>
 +
<br>
-
<table align=left style="border-collapse: collapse">
 
-
<TR>
 
-
<TH ROWSPAN=3 BGCOLOR="#A1C6B2">
 
-
<a name=top></a><p>
 
-
<h3>1. ASM</h3>
 
<font color=black>  
<font color=black>  
 +
 +
 +
 +
<a href=#method><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/ac/Ust_select.gif" width=100 height=100 alt="How to select against E. CRAFT cells that fail to take up the vector plasmid - our alternative selection method"></a>
 +
<a href=#assembly><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/e4/Ust_assembly.gif" width=100 alt="Stepping into the heart of construction - methods of assembly" height=100></a>
 +
<a href=#component>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/71/Ust_details.gif" width=100 height=100 alt="Details of the components – a closer look to the molecular basis of assembly "></a>
 +
<a href=#refer>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/54/Ust_refer.gif" width=100 height=100 alt="References"></a>
 +
 +
<b><font size=14>Strain Construction</font></b><hr>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>
 +
<b><a name=method></a>1. How to select against E. CRAFT cells that fail to take up the vector plasmid - our alternative selection method</b>
</p>
</p>
-
<p >
+
 
-
<h4 align=left>1.1. Theory – how to select? </h4>
+
 
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d0/Ust_Final_product.png width=540></center>
</p>
</p>
 +
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
Our E. CRAFT (<i>Escherichia coli</i> Re-engineered for Antibiotics-Free Transformation) is designed to have one of its essential genes (genes that are required for viability) removed from its genome, and relocated into an engineered plasmid “Dummy”. This would result in E. CRAFT’s dependency on this extra- chromosomal copy of the essential gene for survival, and hence the addiction to the pDummy. By having direct control over the replication of pDummy, we dictate the life and death of E. CRAFT (and hence the name pDummy).
 +
<br><br>
-
The E. trojan is a synthetic E.coli strain that is engineered to lack an essential gene, nadE,  in its genomic DNA. To survive, this strain has to rely on a pre- introduced plasmid (pDummy) bearing the essential gene; thus forcing the bacteria to maintain the plasmid until an alternative source of nadE gene is present. The pDummy, however, has been designed to have a temperature- sensitive origin of replication which would cease to function if the bacterial cells are incubated under higher incubation temperatures (>42ᵒC???). <br><br>
+
Here, we introduce a heat-sensitive origin of replication as the sole origin of pDummy. When we intend to switch off the pDummy’s replication, we can incubate E. CRAFT at a temperature above its optimum 30ᵒC . This origin would then cease to function, and pDummy cannot be maintained.[11] Deprived of the essential gene and its corresponding vital product, E. CRAFT will not be able to propagate unless it receives a heat insensitive analog of pDummy.
-
For sub-cloning purposes, an E. trojan – compatible vector plasmid is designed. This carrier vector, like the pDummy, contains the nadE essential gene. Once a gene of interest is inserted into this  vector, the plasmid can be transformed to the E. trojan for amplification. Incubating the transformed bacteria at a temperature high enough to inactivate the heat sensitive replication origin  of the pDummy would result in pDummy loss, making it necessary for the cells to retain the insert- bearing pCarrier for survival. Bacterial cells that do not take up the pCarrier and its insert would be deprived of the nadE gene product and die; while those who do would survive and continue dividing.
+
<br>
</p>
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/18/Keep_or_kill.jpg width=750></center>
 +
</p>
-
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
This analog plasmid, named “pCarrier”, is essentially our E. CRAFT- compatible vector in cloning. Under an unfavorably high incubation temperature, only E. CRAFT cells that are transformed with the insert-bearing pCarrier would be able to propagate and survive. The remaining E. CRAFT cells would not be able to undergo division and would eventually be eliminated from the population. In this sense, the pDummy can be considered to be "shuffled out" by pCarrier. Our designed selection system, in short, bases itself on plasmid shuffling, with no involvement of antibiotic resistance genes in any cloning step.<a href=#top>[Top]</a><br>
-
<p >
 
-
<h4 align=left>1.2. Method of assembly</h4>
 
</p>
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4a/Ust_Shuffle_pc.jpg width=800></center><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
<p>
 +
<b><a name=assembly></a>2. Stepping into the heart of construction - methods of assembly</b>
 +
</p>
-
To study the population dynamics and behavior of a certain antibiotics sensitive strain of E Coli in a medium of antibiotic, our E. Trojan that is introduced into the culture medium must not process a wide spectrum of antibiotic resistance that impose a selective advantage. At the same time, E. Trojan needs to be transformed with the T4MO gene to carry out its job of signal disruption.
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<br><br>
+
-
Summarizing the above criteria, a solution where the bacteria can be transform with the gene of interest while remaining sensitive to antibiotics is needed. Therefore the requisite is to construct a new bacteria strain that can perform plasmid selection without the use of antibiotics, and contains as little antibiotics resistance gene as possible.<br><br>
+
<b>2.1 Construction and maintenance of an antibiotic-resistance-gene-free plasmid through antibiotic selection the unavoidable evil two plasmid system</b><br>
 +
Our ultimate goal is to construct the E. CRAFT without conferring any new antibiotic resistance on it. For this reason, no resistance gene should be found in our dummy plasmid: the pDummy.
 +
<br><br>
-
<b>Construction and maintenance of an antibiotic-resistance-gene-free plasmid through antibiotic selection – the unavoidable evil two plasmid system</b><br>
+
Yet, ensuring the maintenance of such a plasmid in its host bacterium would be a challenge, unless the cell needs the plasmid for survival (essential- gene- loss induced addiction: loss of the essential gene in bacterial genome causes dependence on the extra-chromosomal copy in pDummy). Inconveniently, however, this addiction can only be achieved after the introduction of the plasmid.
 +
<br>
-
Our ultimate goal is to construct our EX without conferring it any new antibiotic resistance. For this reason no resistance gene should be found in our dummy plasmid pDummy. <br><br>
+
</p>
-
Yet, such a plasmid would not be maintained by itself unless the host bacterium develops an addiction to it (i.e. losses the essential gene in its genome and depends on extragenomic copies on pDummy), and inconveniently, the addiction can only be achieved after the introduction of the plasmid.<br><br>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/7e/Ust_Post-swap_pd.png width=640><br>
 +
<img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/59/Ust_Post-swap_pt.png width=750></center>
 +
</p>
-
The solution is to develop a mutualistic relation between two plasmids and we planned to exploit positively regulated origin of replications. Well studied examples are those in pSC101 and R6K origins of replication, where the origins of replication (OR) appear together with a constitutive gene (G). Initiation of replication happens if and only if the trans element of the gene is provided.<br></p>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<p>
+
The solution to this problem is to develop mutuality between pDummy and another plasmid by exploiting the nature of positively- regulated origins of replication. Well studied examples of such origins include those of pSC101 [2] and R6K plasmids [4, 5, 7, 8], where the origins of replication (OR) appear together with a constitutive gene (G). Initiation of replication happens if and only if the trans- element of the gene is provided.
-
Let’s consider the following scenario: <br>
+
-
i. G is placed on pDummy with no selection marker but with a normal replication origin<br>
+
-
ii. OR is the sole origin of replication of another plasmid (pToolkit) with a selection marker<br>
+
-
iii. pDummy and pToolkit are co-transformed to a bacterium which is under selection stress</p>
+
<br>
<br>
-
<p>
 
-
We would obtain three possible outcomes:<br>
 
-
<b>1. only pDummy is uptaken</b><br>
 
-
- since pDummy has no selection marker, the host bacteria die under selection pressure and cannot propagate<br><br>
 
-
<b>2. only pToolkit is uptaken</b><br>
 
-
- the host bacterium that uptakes pToolkit survives. Yet during propagation, pToolkit is not replicated because proteins of G are absent. Therefore daughter cells of the host bacterium will not receive copies of the pToolkit and die under selection pressure.<br><br>
 
-
<b>3. both pDummy and pToolkit are uptaken</b><br>
 
-
- in presence of pDummy, pToolkit is maintained and confers the host bacterium with stress resistance. Daughters that receive copies of both plasmids will survive and eventually develop into a colony.<br><br></p>
 
 +
</p>
-
<p>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
Using this mutualistic relation, the desired pDummy can be maintained once the host bacterium develops an addiction it, and pToolkit can be lost in bacteria propagation if the expression of G can be shut off manually. Eventually, the bacteria not obtain any new antibiotic resistance genes but keep pDummy.
+
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/32/Ust_ML_of_OR.png width=660></center>
-
 
+
</p>
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<b>Development of addiction – use of the lambda RED recombination system</b><br>
 
-
To develop the addiction in the host bacterium to pDummy, an essential gene for survival is to be deleted from the bacteria genome, provided that the bacteria can survive on extra-genomic copies after the deletion.<br><br>
+
<p>
-
The deletion here is mediated through the lambda RED recombination system.<br><br>
+
Let’s consider the following scenario: <br>
 +
  i. G is placed on the pDummy, which lacks a selection marker but is equipped with a normal replication origin<br>
 +
ii. OR is the sole origin of replication of another plasmid (here we introduce a new plasmid, pToolkit) with a selection marker<br>
 +
iii. pDummy and pToolkit are co-transformed to a bacterium which is under selection stress.<a href=#top>[Top]</a>
 +
<br><br>
 +
</p>
-
The lambda RED recombination cassette is located on the pToolkit (and hence the name of the plasmid). Once the recombination is successful, it can be eliminated from the host bacterium together with the antibiotic resistance gene. <br><br>
 
-
Therefore, once the co-transformation of pDummy and pToolkit is successful, linear dsDNAs having a reporter gene flanked by homologous sequences to the essential gene can be introduced into the bacteria. When the recombination is kicked started, the essential gene will be swapped out and the reporter gene will be incorporated into the bacteria genome.<br><br>
+
<p>
-
Since the linear dsDNAs do not have origin of replications, they are not inherited in daughters unless they are swapped into the genomes. Thus, any observable signals from the reporter would allow identification of successful recombination. Identified colonies can then be further treated to induce loss of pToolkit, which afterwards would be the completed strain of EX.<br><br>
+
Three possible outcomes could be expected:<br>
-
<b>Complementation between reporter genes – manifesting completion of EX engineering</b><br>
+
<b>1. Only pDummy is uptaken</b><br>
 +
Since pDummy has no selection marker, the host bacterium would die under selection pressure and fail to propagate.
-
To ensure that the final strain of EX has: 1. successfully had its essential gene deleted from genome, 2. maintained the pDummy, a complementation reporter system between the pDummy and swapped gene is preferred over a single reporter at the swapped site.<br><br>
+
</p>
-
Different methods can achieve the above aim:<br>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
i. Alpha complementation can be used in E. Coli strains where the lacZ gene is completely removed. The larger fragment ω can be swapped for the essential gene while the smaller α fragment can stay on pDummy. In a X-gal rich medium, blue colonies suggest the desired engineered strains.<br><br>
+
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c4/Ust_Have_pd_only.png width=770></center>
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
ii. Complementation between split fluorescent proteins (sFP). 2010 iGEM Slovenia team has demonstrated the principle that N-terminal and C-terminal fragments of sFPS are able to complement in vivo and two sets of sfFPS are able to undergo Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). This idea is adopted but an alternative set of candidate, split superfolder GFPs (sfGFP), was developed.</p>
+
<b>2. Only pToolkit is uptaken</b><br>
 +
The host bacterium that uptakes pToolkit survives. During its propagation, however, the pToolkit is not replicated because protein products of G are absent. Therefore, daughter cells of the host bacterium would not receive copies of the pToolkit and die under selection pressure.
-
<h5 align=left>Summary of construction flow:</h5>
 
-
<p>1. Assembly pDummy and pToolkit<br>
 
-
2. Co-transform both plasmid into E Coli and maintain stable strains<br>
 
-
3. Introduce linear dsDNAs and induce recombination<br>
 
-
4. Isolate recombinants<br>
 
-
5. Induce loss of pToolkit
 
</p>
</p>
-
<br>
 
-
<p >
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<h4 align=left>1.3. Component details</h4>
+
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/1a/Ust_Have_pt_only.png width=810></center>
</p>
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
 
+
<b>3. Both pDummy and pToolkit are uptaken</b><br>
-
Temperature-sensitive origin of replication_oriR101 & repA101-ts (BBa_K524000)
+
In the presence of pDummy, pToolkit would be maintained and confer resistance to selection pressure on the host bacterium. Daughter cells that receive copies of both plasmids would survive and eventually form a colony.
-
oriR101 & repA101-ts is a set of low copy origin of replication derived from the pSC101 origin of replication. The repA101-ts gene codes for a heat-labile protein that is required in trans for the initiation of replication at oriR101. In our construct, our characterization has shown that plasmids with this origin of replication can only be maintained below than 300C, and partial maintenance of plasmid was observed within temperature range from 290C to 330C. This part was cloned out from pKD46 plasmid (courtesy of The Coli Genetic Stock Center), and standardized by a nucleotide mutation.<br>
+
</p>
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/68/Ust_Have_both.png width=770></center>
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
-
split superfolder green fluroscent protein_split sfGFPsplit superfolder green fluroscent <br>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
protein_split sfGFP<br>
+
-
sfGFP1-10 (BBa_K524001)<br>
+
-
sfGFP11 ((BBa_K524002)
+
 +
<p>
 +
Owing to this mutualistic relation, retention of the desired pDummy would be possible once the host bacterium develops an addiction it, while pToolkit can be lost in bacterial propagation if the expression of G can be shut off manually. Eventually, the bacteria would not obtain any new antibiotic resistance genes but keep pDummy.
</p>
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<b>2.2 Development of addiction – use of the λ RED recombination system [1]</b><br>
 +
Performed with a purpose to induce host bacterium’s addiction to the pDummy, removal of the essential gene <i>nadE</i> from the bacterial genomic DNA is mediated by the phage λ RED recombination system.
 +
<br><br>
-
The sfGFPs are mutated variants of GFPs that has improved folding kinetics and resistance to chemical denaturants. Split sfGFPs at amino acid residues 214 and 215 have been reported to undergo spontaneous complementation to give green fluorescence. The two split constructs were produced from an existing biobrick – pBAD driven sfGFP BBa_I746908. CDS of sfGFP amino acid residues 1-214 were copied out for sfGFP1-10 using PCR and stop codon was added to the end. The sfGFP11 was produced in a similar fashion, with a start codon added to the front of the CDS of amino acid residues 215 to 238.
+
DNA Recombination is in fact inherent in <i>E. coli</i>, and this can be done via the RecBCD Recombination Pathway. Even so, it is not the most ideal method for engineering new strains of <i>E. coli</i> containing genomic modification, in part because this pathway requires a recognition site known as “χ” on the linear “to-be inserted” DNA sequence (called “Transformation DNA” henceforth). While this makes work for a molecular biologist more challenging, naturally, this is quite logical as the RecBCD pathway is meant to be a DNA Repair pathway when the <i>E. coli</i>’s genome is damaged (rather than a means to introduce new DNA material into the genome).
 +
<br><br>
 +
Even so, <i>E. coli</i> has its own natural “enemies” and one known enemy is the phage λ. As phage λ is a lysogenic phage (phage able to enter lysogenic phase), it has mechanisms to ensure that its DNA can be integrated into the host’s genome. One mechanism involves the proteins γ. <i>Exonuclease</i> (<i>Exo</i>) and β. Collectively, these three proteins are called “λ-RED”. Essentially, λ-RED hijacks the DNA repair machinery of the <i>E. coli</i> to promote site-specific homologous recombination. While the exact mechanism is still being contested and investigated, some insights have been gained:
 +
<br><br>
 +
 +
γ will first bind to <i>E. coli</i>’s RecBCD, inhibiting RecB’s nuclease activity, thus shutting down this recombination pathway. <i>Exo</i> will then begin degrading the linear Transformation DNA (dsDNA) in the 5’&rarr;3’ direction, resulting in either 3’ ssDNA overhangs on both sides of the dsDNA or a sole ssDNA (proposed mechanistic differences). β will then bind to the 3’ ssDNA and encourage the ssDNA to anneal to the target dsDNA.
 +
<br><br>
 +
 +
This in turn will activate <i>E. coli</i>’s alternative DNA repair system, RecFOR Recombination Pathway, whereby RecFOR will recruit RecA on to the ssDNA-dsDNA complex (at the homology sites). As the complementation of the linear Transformation and genomic DNA will result in a Holliday junction, RuvABC will be recruited to “resolve” this junction, cleaving away the target DNA on the bacterial genome and integrating the Transformation DNA into the genome. (It should be noted that RecA and RuvABC are also a shared downstream pathway for the RecBCD Recombination Pathway).
 +
<br>
</p>
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a4/Ust_Recombination.png width=600></center>
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<b>Essential gene nadE (BBa_K524003)</b><br>  
+
The λ RED recombination cassette is located in our third plasmid “Toolkit”. Upon successful co-transformation of pDummy and pToolkit, loss of genomic essential gene can be stimulated by introducing- into the bacterial cell- linear dsDNA molecules carrying a reporter gene flanked by sequences homologous to those of the essential gene. An expected outcome of this introduction is the swapping out of the <i>nadE</i> gene with the reporter gene.
 +
<br>
-
<i>nadE</i> is a vital gene in <i>E. Coli.</i> It codes for NAD+ synthetase. In principle, removal of such gene from the genome would cause addiction of bacteria to a plasmid that has a copy of the gene. CyaR (a sRNA) regulates the expression of nadE post-transcriptionally. This feature is retained in our construct. Transcription of <i>nadE</i> operon requires the sigma-70 factor and is terminated by downstream extragenic sites. The <i>nadE</i> gene was cloned out from the genome of strain BL21(DE3), and was completed the <i>nadE</i> by having B0015 terminator assembled to its end.
+
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c7/Ust_Trans_dsDNA.png width=780></center>
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
Since the linear dsDNAs do not have origin of replications, they would not be inherited in daughters unless the swapping has taken place properly. Thus any observable signals from the reporter would allow identification of successful recombination. Once the recombination is completed, the toolkit plasmid and the cell’s antibiotic resistance gene can be eliminated from the host bacterium, giving us the completed strain of E. CRAFT.
 +
<br>
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/6a/Ust_KO_pt.png width=810></center>
</p>
</p>
Line 223: Line 243:
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<b>Replication initiator pi protein and ori-gamma from R6K plasmid</b><br>  
+
<b>2.3 Complementation between reporter genes – manifesting completion of E. CRAFT engineering</b>
 +
<br>
-
ori-gamma is one of three replication origins (the other two being alpha and beta) of the R6K origin. Initiation of replication at ori-gamma requires the pi protein in trans, which is encoded by the pir gene. Yet doubling the concentration of pi protein would effectively shut down the replication as well. Expression of pi protein is autogenously regulated. The pir construct was cloned out from the genome of strain BW25141 (courtesy of The Coli Genetic Stock Center) and standardized. The ori-gamma was adopted from the R6K origin of replication BBa_J61001.
+
To ensure that the final strain of E. CRAFT has:
 +
<br>
 +
(1) successfully had its essential nadE gene deleted from the genome;
 +
<br>
 +
(2) maintained the pDummy,
 +
<br>
-
</p>
+
a complementation reporter system between the pDummy and the swapped gene is preferred over a single reporter at the swap site.
 +
<br><br>
 +
Different methods can be employed to achieve this aim:
 +
<br>
 +
i. α complementation can be used in <i>E. coli</i> strains which have had their lacZ gene completely removed. The larger fragment ω can be swapped in place for the essential gene while the smaller α fragment can stay on pDummy. In an X-gal rich medium, blue colonies would indicate the desired engineered strains.
 +
<br>
 +
ii. Complementation between split fluorescent proteins (sFP). 2010 iGEM Slovenia team has demonstrated the principle that N-terminal and C-terminal fragments of sFPS are able to complement in vivo, and two sets of sfFPS are able to undergo Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET). Using this system has been considered in this project, but an alternative reporter candidate, the split superfolder GFPs (sfGFP) [6, 12, 13] invented by other researchers, was tested instead.
 +
</p>
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/6c/Ust_Reporter.jpg width=700></center>
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
-
<b>iGEM 2010 Slovenia Split/FRET constructs</b><br>  
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
The split CFP and YFP from the biobricks of Slovenia team last year were used as alternative reporters. The idea is to put one of the terminal fragments of a split fluorescence protein into the pDummy, and swap out the essential nadE gene from the genome with the other terminal fragment. Driven by pLac R0010, both fragments should express simultaneously when induced by IPTG and fluorescence signal would be observed as an indicator of successful recombination.
+
<b>2.4 Summary of construction flow:</b><br>
 +
1. Assembly pDummy and pToolkit<br>
 +
2. Co-transformation of both plasmids into <i>E. coli</i> and maintenance of stable strains<br>
 +
3. Introduction of linear ds DNAs and induction of recombination<br>
 +
4. Isolation of recombinants<br>
 +
5. Induction pToolkit loss
 +
<a href=#top>[Top]</a>
 +
<br>
</p>
</p>
-
<p>
 
-
<h3>2. MIC</h3>
 
-
<font color=black>
 
-
 
-
</p>
 
<p >
<p >
-
<h4 align=left>2.1. Theory </h4>
+
<b><a name=component></a>3. Details of the components – a closer look to the molecular basis of assembly</b>
</p>
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<b>3.1 Temperature-sensitive origin of replication_oriR101 & repA101-ts (BBa_K524000)</b><br>
-
<a name=intro></a><b>0. Introduction</b><br>
+
oriR101 & repA101-ts is a set of low copy origins of replication derived from the pSC101 replication origin.[11] The repA101-ts gene encodes for a heat-labile protein that is required in trans for the initiation of replication at oriR101. Characterization of our construct has shown that plasmids with this origin of replication could only be fully maintained if incubated at lower than 30ᵒC, while partial maintenance of plasmid was observed at 33ᵒC. The origin ceases function at 37ᵒC.
-
In order to quantitatively demonstrate the effect of indole charity as well as our construct’s ability to negate it, we have decided to perform a series of minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) tests, where we subjected different strains and mixes of E.coli  to an antibiotic gradient and cultured overnight (18 hours). The OD600 readings of each test were recorded afterwards and will be shown in later sections. <a href=#top>[top]</a><br><br>
+
<br><br>
-
<b>I. Wild Type (RR1) MIC Test</b><br>
+
This part was cloned out from pKD46 plasmid (courtesy of The Coli Genetic Stock Center), and standardized by nucleotide mutation.
-
<u>Phase 1 - Kanamycin MIC test</u><br><br>
 
-
<i>Experimental Design and Aim:<br></i>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
RR1 is a derivative from the common strain K12 and is not known to have any antibiotic resistance other than for streptomycin. Hence it was arbitrarily chosen as the non-resistant ‘wild type’ for our tests. A simple MIC  test was conducted for RR1  to serve as a benchmark for comparison with later experiments, and kanamycin was opted as the antibiotic of choice. This was primarily for two reasons:<br><br>
+
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/b2/Ust_BBa_K524000.png width=640></center>
 +
</p>
-
First, the kanamycin resistance gene incorporated into our selection plasmids functions through producing a mutated ribosomal protein that is insensitive to kanamycin. Unlike some other forms of resistance where antibiotic molecules are directly inactivated, this method  ensures that the antibiotic levels remain relatively constant throughout the experiment, as well as prevents the appearance of satellite colonies during plating. <br>
 
-
The other reason for choosing kanamycin is because, being an aminoglycoside, it acts by inhibiting protein synthesis through binding irreversibly to the 30S ribosome. This causes it to be bacteriostatic at low concentrations while bactericidal at high ones.<br><br>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<b>3.2 split superfolder green fluroscent protein_split sfGFP<br>
 +
sfGFP1-10 (BBa_K524001) [Twins: BBa_K524006]<br>
 +
sfGFP11 (BBa_K524002) [Twins: BBa_K524007]</b><br>
-
<i>Results:<br></i>
+
The sfGFPs are mutant variants of GFPs, with characteristics of improved folding kinetics and resistance to chemical denaturants. [10] Split sfGFPs have been reported to be able to undergo complementation at amino acid residues 214 and 215 to give green fluorescence. [6, 12, 13]
-
However, since we are using another untested K12 strain, namely RR1, and our growth condition is normal LB liquid culture, RR-1 MIC was carried out in the first place to confirm the MIC value for the RR-1 source we obtained. <br><br>
+
<br>
-
The result of the MIC turned out to be around 7~9µg/ml, which is slightly smaller than the result indicated by the paper. The difference in their genotype could be the dominant reason while the less nutritive culture we used may affect the testing result as well.(right or wrong????need to be proved)<br><br>
+
</p>
-
 
+
-
<u>Phase 2 - Kanamycin MIC test with indole supplement<br><br></u>
+
-
 
+
-
<i>Experimental Design and Aim:<br></i>
+
-
Indole has been proposed as a key signalling molecule produced by unstressed (high resistant) E. coli  as a form of ‘charity’ that grants stressed  (low resistance) cells passive immunity against antibiotics. This enables such stressed individuals to continue to survive and proliferate. Indole functions by inducing the expression and activity of multidrug efflux pumps to expel antibiotics and toxins, as well as activating oxidative-stress protective mechanisms to minimize DNA damage.[1] In an attempt to prove and quantify this effect, we repeated the kanamycin MIC test, this time supplementing the LB medium with different concentrations of indole, ranging from 300µM to 2mM.<br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
<i>Results:<br></i>
+
-
The effect of indole on the MIC for RR-1 various under different concentration. Naturally, the indole production of E.coli is around 300µM while under antibiotic stress, the production will decrease to undetectable level.[1] We think the indole concentration of low and high resistance mixed culture should be around 300µM as well. However, the optimal concentration for charity work is still unknown.<br><br>
+
-
+
-
For the testing under indole concentration of 300µM and 500µM, we can see that the MIC for RR-1 increased to (        )which is in consistence with the result of our Mixed culture MIC posted later. The RR-1 is able to survive under kanamycin concentration of  (      ) .<br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
On the other hand, we also did some 1mM and 2mM indole MIC testing, which aims at finding out whether the over dosage of indole could kill the population instead of protecting them. The result shows that indole did have a killing effect at higher concentration and the MIC did decrease compared to the result of 300µM indole MIC.<br><br>
+
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/8d/Ust_BBa_K524001%266.png width=530>
 +
<br>
 +
<img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d9/Ust_BBa_K524002%267.png width=510></center>
 +
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<b>3.3 Essential gene <i>nadE</i> (BBa_K524003)</b><br>
 +
<i>nadE</i>, which encodes the enzyme NAD+ synthetase, is a vital gene in <i>E. coli</i>. [2] In principle, removal of such a gene from the bacterial genome would cause the cells to be addicted to a plasmid that has a copy of the gene. CyaR (a sRNA) regulates the expression of <i>nadE</i> post-transcriptionally, and this feature is retained in our construct. Transcription of <i>nadE</i> operon requires the sigma-70 initiation factor and is terminated by downstream extragenic sites.
 +
<br><br>
 +
The <i>nadE</i> gene was cloned out from the genome of <i>E. coli</i> strain BL21(DE3), and its construction was completed by ligating B0015 double terminator to its end.
 +
<br>
 +
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2a/Ust_BBa_K524003.png width=600></center>
</p>
</p>
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<b>II. Mixed Culture MIC Tests<br></b>
+
<b>3.4 π replication initiator protein encoded by pir gene (BBa_K524004) and γ-origin of replication (ori-γ) from R6K plasmid</b><br>  
-
<u>Phase 1 - Wild type (RR1) with RFP-labelled kanamycin resistance strain (RFP) (99:1)<br><br></u>
+
Ori-γ is one of the three replication origins (the other two being α and β) of the R6K origin. Initiation of replication at ori-γ is regulated in trans by the π protein encoded by pir gene. [4, 5] While the presence of the appropriate amount of π protein is required for replication initiation, doubling the concentration of the same protein would effectively shut down the process. [8] Expression of π protein is autogenously regulated. [7]
 +
<br><br>
-
<i>Experimental Design and Aim:<br></i>
+
In the fabrication of these two constructs, the pir gene was cloned out from the genome of BW25141 <i>E. coli</i> strain (courtesy of The Coli Genetic Stock Center) and standardized.  
-
As metioned previously, when E. coli  cultures are subjected to antibiotic selection pressure, a small number of naturally resistant individuals, at some cost to themselves, provide protection to other more vulnerable cells by producing indole, resulting in an overall enhancement of the survival capacity of the population in stressful environments. To mimic this naturally occurred phenomenon, a kanamycin resistant strain, which represents the mutants, was introduced into the RR-1 at 1:99 ratio.  This kanamycin resistant strain was labeled with RFP for easy recognition. The ratio of kanamycin resistant strain, KanR/RFP, to RR-1 was recorded for later comparison with that of later mix culture assays.<br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
<i>Results:<br></i>
+
-
We can clearly see the effect of the charity work from our result. Even under kanamycin concentration of 25µg/ml, which is half of the working concentration of kanamycin and almost 3 folds of RR-1 MIC, RR-1 is still growing rapidly and maintain the majority of the overnight culture. The OD600 result didn’t show a clear co-relation with kanamycin concentration and is floating around 1.1.<br><br>
+
-
The column chart also shows that the ratio of RFP to RR-1 falls between ½ and ⅓ after overnight culture. This ratio may change when the kanamycin concentration approach its working concentration. We plan to prove this in our future testing.
+
<br><br>
<br><br>
-
<u>Phase 2 - Wild type (RR1) with kanamycin resistance T4MO (GRP)<br><br></u>
+
The ori-γ was adopted from the R6K origin of replication BBa_J61001.
 +
<br>
-
<i>Experimental Design and Aim:<br></i>
+
</p>
-
In order to interfere the indole charity work and obtain a more efficient selection, we introduce a plasmid which encodes Toluene-4-Monooxygenase (T4MO), an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of indole into indigo. To test its effect, we design a T4MO/KanR and RR-1 (1:1) mixture culture MIC test. In this test, we assume that the indole degradation rate of T4MO will be close to the indole producing rate of itself along with the mutated minority in RR-1, which means a lower MIC of RR-1 will be observed in comparison of the KanR/RFP and RR-1 mixculture due to the absence of the indole charity work. The ratio of T4MO/KanR to RR-1 was also kept in the testing for later comparison with that of the 3 way mix culture assay.<br><br>
+
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
<center><img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/e3/Ust_BBa_K524004.png width=450></center>
 +
</p>
 +
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
-
<i>
+
<b>3.5 iGEM 2010 Slovenia Split/FRET constructs</b><br>  
-
Results:<br></i>
+
-
Since the charity work is simply being weakened by the introduced enzyme, RR-1 is still growing quite well under kanamycin concentration of 25µg/ml. However, the ratio of the two strain, T4MO/KanR and RR-1, is different from former result from mixed culture of RFP/KanR and RR-1. Under lower kanamycin concentration, RR-1 still remain to be the majority of the culture and the difference is not very obvious. When kanamycin concentration exceeds 10µg/ml, we can see that T4MO out-competed RR-1 and became the majority of the overnight culture. Comparing with the ratio got from RFP&RR-1 mixed culture, we can draw the conclusion that the charity work of is weakened and the efficiency of (  )<br><br>
+
 +
The split Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) and Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) biobricks constructed by the 2010 Slovenia Team are used as alternatives to the superfolder GFP reporter. The idea here is to put one of the terminal fragments of either CFP or YFP into the pDummy, and swap out the essential <i>nadE</i> gene from the bacterial genome with the other terminal fragment of the fluorescent protein. Driven by pLac R0010, both fragments should be expressed simultaneously when induced by IPTG. Fluorescent signal observed could be used as an indicator of successful recombination.
 +
<a href=#top>[Top]</a>
 +
<br>
 +
</p>
-
<u>Phase 3 - Wild type (RR1), RFP-labelled kanR strain and GFP-Labeled KanR T4MO (98:1:1) [???]<br><br></u>
 
-
 
-
It has been proved in the phase 2 that T4MO does interrupt the indole charity work. So in the next step, we plan to practice our model, which is introducing a T4MO strain into the environment predominantly consisting of RR-1with few kanamycin resistant mutants. By comparing the resulting ratio of RR-1 to the antibiotic resistant strain to that of the T4MO and RR-1 Mix culture, we may observe again the strong effect of indole; by comparing the resulting ratio of RR-1 to the antibiotic resistant strain to that of the KanR/RFP RR-1 Mix culture without T4MO, we would be able to tell how T4MO takes effect.<br><br>
 
 +
<hr>
 +
<br>
 +
</p><p>
 +
<p >
 +
<b><a name=refer></a>4. References</b>
</p>
</p>
-
 
-
 
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
<p align=justify style="margin: 20px 20px 20px 20px">
 +
1. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL.(2000). One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in <i>Escherichia coli</i> K-12 using PCR products, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6640-5.
 +
<br><br>
 +
2. D. Manen, L. Caro.(1991). The replication of plasmid pSC101, Mol Microbiol. 1991 Feb;5(2):233-7.
 +
<br><br>
 +
3. Ecocyc: Encyclopedia of <i>Escherichia coli</i> K-12 Genes and Metabolism
 +
<br><br>
-
<b>III. Conclusion<br></b>
+
4. F Wu, I Goldberg, and M Filutowicz.(1992). Roles of a 106-bp origin enhancer and <i>Escherichia coli</i> DnaA protein in replication of plasmid R6K, Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 February 25; 20(4): 811–817.
-
[lalaala]
+
<br><br>
-
<b>IV. Future Plans<br></b>
+
5. F Wu, I Goldberg, and M Filutowicz.(1994). Binding of DnaA protein to a replication enhancer counteracts the inhibition of plasmid R6K γ origin replication mediated by elevated levels of R6K π protein, J Bacteriol. 1994 November; 176(22): 6795–6801.
 +
<br><br>
-
<u>Phase II - Wild type (RR1), RFP-labeled kanR, and GFP-labeled T4MO/Bcr mix<br><br></u>
+
6. Jun Zhou, Jian Lin, Cuihong Zhou, Xiaoyan Deng and Bin Xia.(2011). An improved bimolecular fluorescence complementation tool based on superfolder green fluorescent protein, Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 43 (3): 239-244.
 +
<br><br>
-
Our ultimate goal is to boost the selection efficiency by introducing a T4MO/Bcr strain, which can interfere with the indole charity work. The Bcr gene, which encodes a multidrug pump, keep this strain survive and produce T4MO. By adjusting IPTG concentration, this strain will keep working for a certain period of time and die afterwards as to the accumulation of kanamycin inside the cell. However, as we didn’t have time to characterize the efficiency of Bcr, and another essential part of our project, the alternative selection method, is still in progress yet, we are unable to do this construction and perform further testing.<br><br>
+
7. M Filutowicz, G Davis, A Greener, and D R Helinski.(1985). Autorepressor properties of the π-initiation protein encoded by plasmid R6K, Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 January 11; 13(1): 103–114.
-
(insert a picture here showing out ideal construction)
+
<br><br>
-
By having this strain in the population, the charity work will be restricted, so that the selection process can be done efficiently without applying over dosage of antibiotics, and the presence of this strain can be controlled by us so that this alien strain only performs the duty of degrading indole and brings no side effect on the whole selection process.<br><br>
+
8. M Filutowicz, M J McEachern, and D R Helinski.(1986). Positive and negative roles of an initiator protein at an origin of replication, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 December; 83(24): 9645–9649.
 +
<br><br>
 +
9. Peubez I, Chaudet N, Mignon C, Hild G, Husson S, Courtois V, De Luca K, Speck D, Sodoyer R.(2010). Antibiotic-free selection in <i>E. coli</i>: new considerations for optimal design and improved production, Microb Cell Fact. 2010 Sep 7;9:65
 +
<br><br>
-
<b>V. Biobrick construction<br><br></b>
+
10. Pédelacq JD, Cabantous S, Tran T, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS.(2006). Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein, Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Jan;24(1):79-88. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
 +
<br><br>
-
<u>Bcr</u>
+
11. Phillips GJ.(1995). New Cloning Vectors with Temperature-Sensitive Replication, Plasmid. 1999 Jan;41(1):78-81.
-
Bcr is a type of multidrug efflux pump, which are integral membrane proteins that utilize cellular energy to extrude antibiotics or biocides actively out of the cell. It belongs to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), and is known to contribute to multidrug resistance in E. coli. <br><br>
+
<br><br>
-
Under normal growth conditions, a large number of drug efflux pumps are thought to be weakly expressed. In particular, literature documents Bcr to confer varying degrees of resistance to several kinds of antibiotics when overexpressed; including bicyclomycin (selection-capable), tetracycline (8-fold MIC increase*), and kanamycin (4-fold MIC increase*).<br><br>
+
-
In our iGEM project, we planned to construct a biobrick with the pLac promoter driving expression of Bcr. The reason behind this is to take advantage of the additive effect of IPTG on pLac activation. We hope that by varying the concentration of IPTG, we can control the level of expression of Bcr and thus manipulate the mutant E. coli’s MIC to certain antibiotics.
+
12. Stéphanie Cabantous, Thomas C Terwilliger & Geoffrey S Waldo.(2004). Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein, Nature Biotechnology 23, 102 – 107
<br><br>
<br><br>
-
However, as the time limited,we only submit a plasmid contain only the bcr gene to part registry. You can use it for selection of bacteria in the future.<br><br>
 
-
*: compared with wild type<br><br>
 
-
<b>VI. Appendix<br><br></b>
+
13. Stéphanie Cabantous & Geoffrey S Waldo.(2006). In vivo and in vitro protein solubility assays using split GFP, Nature Methods - 3, 845 – 854
-
[Extra data] Protocols will probably be included in the Notebook section<br>
+
<br><br>
 +
<a href=#top>[Top]</a><br><br>
 +
</font>
 +
</TH>
 +
</TD>
 +
  </TR>
 +
</table>
-
<hr>
 
-
</p><p>
 
-
[1] (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7311/abs/nature09354.html)<br>
 
-
[2](http://www.scielo.br/pdf/gmb/v26n2/a17v26n2.pdf)
 
-
</p>
 
-
<br>
 
-
</font>
 
-
</TH>
+
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10">
 +
<tr>
 +
<td width="100px" height="150px"; bgcolor="#980000" >
 +
<p align="center">  
-
    <TD bgcolor="white" width=160 height=150>
+
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong" target=_top>
-
<p>
+
<b><font color="#FFE1E1" size=3>Home</font></b>
-
 
+
-
<h2>ASM</h2>
+
-
 
+
-
</font>
+
</p>
</p>
-
<br><br><br>
+
</td>
-
<img src=.jpg width=100 height=100><BR>
+
-
1 ASM <br>
+
-
1.1 Theory – how to select? <br>
+
-
1.2 Method of assembly<br>
+
-
1.3 Component details<br><br>
+
 +
<td width="382px" bgcolor="#CCFF99" valign="baseline">
 +
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<b><font color="green">Our Project</font></b></p>
-
</TD>
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/overview.html" target=_top>Overview</a><font color="green"> | </font>
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/data.html" target=_top>Data Page</a><br></p>
 +
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<b><font color="green">Experiments and Results</font></b></p>
-
    </TR>
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/asm.html"  target=_top>Strain Construction</a><font color="green"> | </font>
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/mic.html"  target=_top>Culture Tests</a><font color="green"> | </font>
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/modeling.html"  target=_top>Modeling</a><br></p>
-
<TR>
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
-
<TD bgcolor=white height=150><p>
+
<b><font color="green">Miscellaneous</font></b></p>
 +
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/notebook.html" target=_top>Notebook</a></p>
-
</TD>
+
</td>
-
    </TR>
+
-
 
-
<TR>
 
-
<TD bgcolor=#182828 height=3500><p>
 
-
<font color=#CDD2C2>
 
-
</font>
+
<td width="302px" bgcolor="#D09C00" valign="baseline">
-
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<b><font color="#FFF4D0">iGEM Resources</font></b></p>
 +
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/acknowledgement.html" target=_top>Acknowledgements</a></p>
-
</TD>  
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
-
    </TR>
+
<b><font color="#FFF4D0">The Team</font></b></p>
 +
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/team.html" target=_top>iGEM Member List</a><font color="#FFF4D0"> | </font>
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/contribution.html" target=_top>Contributions</a><br></p>
-
</table>
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<b><font color="#FFF4D0">Achievements</font></b></p>
 +
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/medal.html" target=_top>Medal Requirements</a><font color="#FFF4D0"> | </font>
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/biosafety.html" target=_top>BioSafety</a><br></p>
-
<br>
 
-
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10">
 
-
<tr>
 
-
<td width="100px" height="150px"; bgcolor="#980000" >
 
-
<p align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#FFE1E1">
 
-
<a href=https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="4" color="#FFE1E1" font color=white><span style="font-weight:700">Home</span></font></a></font></b></p>
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
-
</p>
+
<b><font color="#FFF4D0">BioBricks</font></b></p>
-
</td>
+
-
<td width="332px" bgcolor="#CCFF99" valign="baseline">
 
-
<p align="center" valign="baseline"><b> <font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3" color="green">
 
-
Our Project</font></b></p>
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
-
<p align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="green">
+
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/characterization.html" target=_top>Master List & Characterization Data</a><br></p>
-
<a href=team.html><font color=green>
+
-
<a href="overview.html" target=_top>Overview</a> |
+
-
<a href="data.html" target=_top>Data Page</a><br>
+
-
<span style="line-height:1; font-weight:600">Experiments and Results</span><br>
+
-
<a href="asm.html" target=_top>Strain construction</a> |
+
-
<a href="mic.html"  target=_top>Culture tests</a> |
+
-
<a href="modeling.html"  target=_top>Modeling</a><br>
+
-
<span style="line-height:1; font-weight:600">Miscellaneous</span><br>
 
-
<a href="future.html" target=_top>Future Plans</a> |
 
-
<a href="notebook.html" target=_top>Notebook</a>
 
-
</font></a><br></font></p>
 
</td>
</td>
-
<td width="332px" bgcolor="#D09C00" valign="baseline">
 
-
<p align="left"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3" color="#FFF4D0">
 
-
         
 
-
iGEM Resources</font></b></p>
 
-
<p align="left"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1" color="#FFFFFF">
 
-
<a href="acknowledgement.html" target=_top>Acknowledgements</a><br>
 
-
<span style="line-height:0.7; font-weight:600">The Team</span><br>
 
-
<a href="team.html" target=_top>iGEM Member List</a> |
 
-
<a href="contribution.html" target=_top>Contributions</a><br>
 
-
<span style="line-height:0.7; font-weight:600">Achievements</span><br>
 
-
<a href="medal.html" target=_top>Medal Requirements</a> |
 
-
<a href="biosafety.html" target=_top>BioSafety</a><br>
 
-
<span style="line-height:0.7; font-weight:600">Biobricks</span><br>
 
-
<a href="characterization.html" target=_top>Master List & Characterization Data</a>
 
-
<a href=.html><font color=white>
+
<td width="180px"bgcolor="#980000"valign="baseline">  
-
</font></a><br><font></p>
+
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
-
</td>
+
<b><font color="#FFE0E0">Human Practice</font></b></p>
 +
<p align="center" valign="baseline">
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/workshop.html" target=_top>Workshop</a><font color="white"> | </font>
 +
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:HKUST-Hong_Kong/survey.html" target=_top>Survey</a><br></p>
-
<td width="200px"bgcolor="#980000"valign="baseline">
 
-
<p align="left" valign="baseline"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3" color="#FFE0E0">
 
-
Human Practice</font></b></p>
 
-
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#FFFFFF">
 
-
<a href="human.html" target=_top><font color=white>Workshop</font></a> |
 
-
<a href="survey.html" target=_top><font color=white>Survey</font></a>
 
-
</font></p>
 
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
-
 
-
 
</body>
</body>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 18:57, 28 October 2011

How to Select · Methods of Assembly · Details of Components · References


How to select against E. CRAFT cells that fail to take up the vector plasmid - our alternative selection method Stepping into the heart of construction - methods of assembly Details of the components – a closer look to the molecular basis of assembly References Strain Construction



1. How to select against E. CRAFT cells that fail to take up the vector plasmid - our alternative selection method

Our E. CRAFT (Escherichia coli Re-engineered for Antibiotics-Free Transformation) is designed to have one of its essential genes (genes that are required for viability) removed from its genome, and relocated into an engineered plasmid “Dummy”. This would result in E. CRAFT’s dependency on this extra- chromosomal copy of the essential gene for survival, and hence the addiction to the pDummy. By having direct control over the replication of pDummy, we dictate the life and death of E. CRAFT (and hence the name pDummy).

Here, we introduce a heat-sensitive origin of replication as the sole origin of pDummy. When we intend to switch off the pDummy’s replication, we can incubate E. CRAFT at a temperature above its optimum 30ᵒC . This origin would then cease to function, and pDummy cannot be maintained.[11] Deprived of the essential gene and its corresponding vital product, E. CRAFT will not be able to propagate unless it receives a heat insensitive analog of pDummy.

This analog plasmid, named “pCarrier”, is essentially our E. CRAFT- compatible vector in cloning. Under an unfavorably high incubation temperature, only E. CRAFT cells that are transformed with the insert-bearing pCarrier would be able to propagate and survive. The remaining E. CRAFT cells would not be able to undergo division and would eventually be eliminated from the population. In this sense, the pDummy can be considered to be "shuffled out" by pCarrier. Our designed selection system, in short, bases itself on plasmid shuffling, with no involvement of antibiotic resistance genes in any cloning step.[Top]



2. Stepping into the heart of construction - methods of assembly

2.1 Construction and maintenance of an antibiotic-resistance-gene-free plasmid through antibiotic selection – the unavoidable evil two plasmid system
Our ultimate goal is to construct the E. CRAFT without conferring any new antibiotic resistance on it. For this reason, no resistance gene should be found in our dummy plasmid: the pDummy.

Yet, ensuring the maintenance of such a plasmid in its host bacterium would be a challenge, unless the cell needs the plasmid for survival (essential- gene- loss induced addiction: loss of the essential gene in bacterial genome causes dependence on the extra-chromosomal copy in pDummy). Inconveniently, however, this addiction can only be achieved after the introduction of the plasmid.


The solution to this problem is to develop mutuality between pDummy and another plasmid by exploiting the nature of positively- regulated origins of replication. Well studied examples of such origins include those of pSC101 [2] and R6K plasmids [4, 5, 7, 8], where the origins of replication (OR) appear together with a constitutive gene (G). Initiation of replication happens if and only if the trans- element of the gene is provided.

Let’s consider the following scenario:
i. G is placed on the pDummy, which lacks a selection marker but is equipped with a normal replication origin
ii. OR is the sole origin of replication of another plasmid (here we introduce a new plasmid, pToolkit) with a selection marker
iii. pDummy and pToolkit are co-transformed to a bacterium which is under selection stress.[Top]

Three possible outcomes could be expected:
1. Only pDummy is uptaken
Since pDummy has no selection marker, the host bacterium would die under selection pressure and fail to propagate.


2. Only pToolkit is uptaken
The host bacterium that uptakes pToolkit survives. During its propagation, however, the pToolkit is not replicated because protein products of G are absent. Therefore, daughter cells of the host bacterium would not receive copies of the pToolkit and die under selection pressure.


3. Both pDummy and pToolkit are uptaken
In the presence of pDummy, pToolkit would be maintained and confer resistance to selection pressure on the host bacterium. Daughter cells that receive copies of both plasmids would survive and eventually form a colony.


Owing to this mutualistic relation, retention of the desired pDummy would be possible once the host bacterium develops an addiction it, while pToolkit can be lost in bacterial propagation if the expression of G can be shut off manually. Eventually, the bacteria would not obtain any new antibiotic resistance genes but keep pDummy.

2.2 Development of addiction – use of the λ RED recombination system [1]
Performed with a purpose to induce host bacterium’s addiction to the pDummy, removal of the essential gene nadE from the bacterial genomic DNA is mediated by the phage λ RED recombination system.

DNA Recombination is in fact inherent in E. coli, and this can be done via the RecBCD Recombination Pathway. Even so, it is not the most ideal method for engineering new strains of E. coli containing genomic modification, in part because this pathway requires a recognition site known as “χ” on the linear “to-be inserted” DNA sequence (called “Transformation DNA” henceforth). While this makes work for a molecular biologist more challenging, naturally, this is quite logical as the RecBCD pathway is meant to be a DNA Repair pathway when the E. coli’s genome is damaged (rather than a means to introduce new DNA material into the genome).

Even so, E. coli has its own natural “enemies” and one known enemy is the phage λ. As phage λ is a lysogenic phage (phage able to enter lysogenic phase), it has mechanisms to ensure that its DNA can be integrated into the host’s genome. One mechanism involves the proteins γ. Exonuclease (Exo) and β. Collectively, these three proteins are called “λ-RED”. Essentially, λ-RED hijacks the DNA repair machinery of the E. coli to promote site-specific homologous recombination. While the exact mechanism is still being contested and investigated, some insights have been gained:

γ will first bind to E. coli’s RecBCD, inhibiting RecB’s nuclease activity, thus shutting down this recombination pathway. Exo will then begin degrading the linear Transformation DNA (dsDNA) in the 5’→3’ direction, resulting in either 3’ ssDNA overhangs on both sides of the dsDNA or a sole ssDNA (proposed mechanistic differences). β will then bind to the 3’ ssDNA and encourage the ssDNA to anneal to the target dsDNA.

This in turn will activate E. coli’s alternative DNA repair system, RecFOR Recombination Pathway, whereby RecFOR will recruit RecA on to the ssDNA-dsDNA complex (at the homology sites). As the complementation of the linear Transformation and genomic DNA will result in a Holliday junction, RuvABC will be recruited to “resolve” this junction, cleaving away the target DNA on the bacterial genome and integrating the Transformation DNA into the genome. (It should be noted that RecA and RuvABC are also a shared downstream pathway for the RecBCD Recombination Pathway).

The λ RED recombination cassette is located in our third plasmid “Toolkit”. Upon successful co-transformation of pDummy and pToolkit, loss of genomic essential gene can be stimulated by introducing- into the bacterial cell- linear dsDNA molecules carrying a reporter gene flanked by sequences homologous to those of the essential gene. An expected outcome of this introduction is the swapping out of the nadE gene with the reporter gene.


Since the linear dsDNAs do not have origin of replications, they would not be inherited in daughters unless the swapping has taken place properly. Thus any observable signals from the reporter would allow identification of successful recombination. Once the recombination is completed, the toolkit plasmid and the cell’s antibiotic resistance gene can be eliminated from the host bacterium, giving us the completed strain of E. CRAFT.

2.3 Complementation between reporter genes – manifesting completion of E. CRAFT engineering
To ensure that the final strain of E. CRAFT has:
(1) successfully had its essential nadE gene deleted from the genome;
(2) maintained the pDummy,
a complementation reporter system between the pDummy and the swapped gene is preferred over a single reporter at the swap site.

Different methods can be employed to achieve this aim:
i. α complementation can be used in E. coli strains which have had their lacZ gene completely removed. The larger fragment ω can be swapped in place for the essential gene while the smaller α fragment can stay on pDummy. In an X-gal rich medium, blue colonies would indicate the desired engineered strains.
ii. Complementation between split fluorescent proteins (sFP). 2010 iGEM Slovenia team has demonstrated the principle that N-terminal and C-terminal fragments of sFPS are able to complement in vivo, and two sets of sfFPS are able to undergo Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET). Using this system has been considered in this project, but an alternative reporter candidate, the split superfolder GFPs (sfGFP) [6, 12, 13] invented by other researchers, was tested instead.


2.4 Summary of construction flow:
1. Assembly pDummy and pToolkit
2. Co-transformation of both plasmids into E. coli and maintenance of stable strains
3. Introduction of linear ds DNAs and induction of recombination
4. Isolation of recombinants
5. Induction pToolkit loss [Top]

3. Details of the components – a closer look to the molecular basis of assembly

3.1 Temperature-sensitive origin of replication_oriR101 & repA101-ts (BBa_K524000)
oriR101 & repA101-ts is a set of low copy origins of replication derived from the pSC101 replication origin.[11] The repA101-ts gene encodes for a heat-labile protein that is required in trans for the initiation of replication at oriR101. Characterization of our construct has shown that plasmids with this origin of replication could only be fully maintained if incubated at lower than 30ᵒC, while partial maintenance of plasmid was observed at 33ᵒC. The origin ceases function at 37ᵒC.

This part was cloned out from pKD46 plasmid (courtesy of The Coli Genetic Stock Center), and standardized by nucleotide mutation.

3.2 split superfolder green fluroscent protein_split sfGFP
sfGFP1-10 (BBa_K524001) [Twins: BBa_K524006]
sfGFP11 (BBa_K524002) [Twins: BBa_K524007]

The sfGFPs are mutant variants of GFPs, with characteristics of improved folding kinetics and resistance to chemical denaturants. [10] Split sfGFPs have been reported to be able to undergo complementation at amino acid residues 214 and 215 to give green fluorescence. [6, 12, 13]


3.3 Essential gene nadE (BBa_K524003)
nadE, which encodes the enzyme NAD+ synthetase, is a vital gene in E. coli. [2] In principle, removal of such a gene from the bacterial genome would cause the cells to be addicted to a plasmid that has a copy of the gene. CyaR (a sRNA) regulates the expression of nadE post-transcriptionally, and this feature is retained in our construct. Transcription of nadE operon requires the sigma-70 initiation factor and is terminated by downstream extragenic sites.

The nadE gene was cloned out from the genome of E. coli strain BL21(DE3), and its construction was completed by ligating B0015 double terminator to its end.

3.4 π replication initiator protein encoded by pir gene (BBa_K524004) and γ-origin of replication (ori-γ) from R6K plasmid
Ori-γ is one of the three replication origins (the other two being α and β) of the R6K origin. Initiation of replication at ori-γ is regulated in trans by the π protein encoded by pir gene. [4, 5] While the presence of the appropriate amount of π protein is required for replication initiation, doubling the concentration of the same protein would effectively shut down the process. [8] Expression of π protein is autogenously regulated. [7]

In the fabrication of these two constructs, the pir gene was cloned out from the genome of BW25141 E. coli strain (courtesy of The Coli Genetic Stock Center) and standardized.

The ori-γ was adopted from the R6K origin of replication BBa_J61001.

3.5 iGEM 2010 Slovenia Split/FRET constructs
The split Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) and Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) biobricks constructed by the 2010 Slovenia Team are used as alternatives to the superfolder GFP reporter. The idea here is to put one of the terminal fragments of either CFP or YFP into the pDummy, and swap out the essential nadE gene from the bacterial genome with the other terminal fragment of the fluorescent protein. Driven by pLac R0010, both fragments should be expressed simultaneously when induced by IPTG. Fluorescent signal observed could be used as an indicator of successful recombination. [Top]



4. References

1. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL.(2000). One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6640-5.

2. D. Manen, L. Caro.(1991). The replication of plasmid pSC101, Mol Microbiol. 1991 Feb;5(2):233-7.

3. Ecocyc: Encyclopedia of Escherichia coli K-12 Genes and Metabolism

4. F Wu, I Goldberg, and M Filutowicz.(1992). Roles of a 106-bp origin enhancer and Escherichia coli DnaA protein in replication of plasmid R6K, Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 February 25; 20(4): 811–817.

5. F Wu, I Goldberg, and M Filutowicz.(1994). Binding of DnaA protein to a replication enhancer counteracts the inhibition of plasmid R6K γ origin replication mediated by elevated levels of R6K π protein, J Bacteriol. 1994 November; 176(22): 6795–6801.

6. Jun Zhou, Jian Lin, Cuihong Zhou, Xiaoyan Deng and Bin Xia.(2011). An improved bimolecular fluorescence complementation tool based on superfolder green fluorescent protein, Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 43 (3): 239-244.

7. M Filutowicz, G Davis, A Greener, and D R Helinski.(1985). Autorepressor properties of the π-initiation protein encoded by plasmid R6K, Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 January 11; 13(1): 103–114.

8. M Filutowicz, M J McEachern, and D R Helinski.(1986). Positive and negative roles of an initiator protein at an origin of replication, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 December; 83(24): 9645–9649.

9. Peubez I, Chaudet N, Mignon C, Hild G, Husson S, Courtois V, De Luca K, Speck D, Sodoyer R.(2010). Antibiotic-free selection in E. coli: new considerations for optimal design and improved production, Microb Cell Fact. 2010 Sep 7;9:65

10. Pédelacq JD, Cabantous S, Tran T, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS.(2006). Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein, Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Jan;24(1):79-88. Epub 2005 Dec 20.

11. Phillips GJ.(1995). New Cloning Vectors with Temperature-Sensitive Replication, Plasmid. 1999 Jan;41(1):78-81.

12. Stéphanie Cabantous, Thomas C Terwilliger & Geoffrey S Waldo.(2004). Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein, Nature Biotechnology 23, 102 – 107

13. Stéphanie Cabantous & Geoffrey S Waldo.(2006). In vivo and in vitro protein solubility assays using split GFP, Nature Methods - 3, 845 – 854

[Top]

Home

Our Project

Overview | Data Page

Experiments and Results

Strain Construction | Culture Tests | Modeling

Miscellaneous

Notebook

iGEM Resources

Acknowledgements

The Team

iGEM Member List | Contributions

Achievements

Medal Requirements | BioSafety

BioBricks

Master List & Characterization Data

Human Practice

Workshop | Survey