Team:TzuChiU Formosa/Humanpractice/review

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(22 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
</object>
</object>
<div align="center" width="100%">
<div align="center" width="100%">
-
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="100" width=900" data="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fc/HPMenu3.0.swf">
+
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="100" width=1000" data="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/91/HPMenu6.0.swf">
-
<param name="movie" value="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fc/HPMenu3.0.swf" />
+
<param name="movie" value="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/91/HPMenu6.0.swf" />
<param name="quality" value="high" />
<param name="quality" value="high" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
</object>
</object>
</div>
</div>
-
 
-
<font color="#000080" size=6>A review written by Dr. Chen Chun-Yao</font><br>
 
-
<br>
 
</p>
</p>
-
<font color="#000000" size=4>Prof. Chun-Yao Chen</font><br>
+
</html>
-
PhD in Comparative Biology
+
-
Cornell University, USA
+
-
<br>
+
-
Associate Professor
+
-
Department of Life Sciences
+
-
Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
+
-
Field : Bacteriology, Microbiology, Ecology
+
-
<p>
+
[[File:Chen1.jpg |right|300px]]
 +
 
 +
<font color="#000080" size=5>A review written by Dr. Chen Chun-Yao</font><br>
<br>
<br>
-
Summer is officially over and it’s the start of a brand new semester. In conjunction with the enrolment of the 100th year intake, we conducted a few workshops on the subject of synthetic biology in collaboration with the College of Life Sciences. Prof. Sun Der Shan and Prof. Woon Peng Yeong coordinated the workshops while our teammates operated as the tutors to the participants. Our team members not only carried out and learnt their project; they also shared their experiences with others and promote synthetic biology to the general public.
 
-
<br><br>
+
<font color="#000000" size=4>Prof. Chun-Yao Chen</font>
-
<p>
+
-
During the 1st day of the workshops, we managed to cover various aspects of synthetic biology, from the introduction of synthetic biology including the history, current applications and future directions as well as the iGEM competition. On the other hand, we also performed the basic techniques in molecular biology such as plasmid isolation, enzyme digestion, Polymerase Chain Reaction, gel electrophoresis, insert preparation, gel extraction, ligation and transformation, cloning, autoclaving, flaming, primer design, growth curves, as well as screening techniques to the participants.
 
-
<br><br>
+
<br>PhD in Comparative Biology
-
<p>
+
<br>Cornell University, USA
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
The highlight of the event is the plasmid isolation and enzyme digestion workshop held on the 2nd day. All the participants were given a chance to perform in the activity. We, as the tutors assisted them throughout the whole process. By the end of the workshop, they learned to cut a plasmid with restriction enzyme, to paste DNA with ligase and PCR amplification.
+
-
 
+
-
<br><br>
+
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/11/TCU_ws1.JPG">
+
-
<br><font size=3>↑2nd day of the workshop wet-lab day:</font>
+
<br>
<br>
 +
<br>Associate Professor
 +
<br>Department of Life Sciences
 +
<br>Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
 +
<br>Field : Bacteriology, Microbiology, Ecology
<br>
<br>
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2a/TCU_ws2.JPG">
+
<br><font color="#000000" size=3><b>Is genetically modified crop (GMC) ecologically safe?  More research is needed.</b></font>
-
<br><font size=3>↑Ting-ting is explaining to her how to use a pippette</font>
+
<br>Chun-Yao Chen, Department of Life Science, Tzu-Chi University
<br>
<br>
 +
<br>This issue can be examined at four levels.
<br>
<br>
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/69/TCU_ws4.JPG">
 
-
<br><font size=3>↑Andrew is demonstrating the step in the fume hood</font>
 
<br>
<br>
 +
<br><font color="#000000" size=3><b>1. Will the GMC survive and outcompete local plants?</b>
 +
<br>These crop species are generally less fit in the environments when compared with the indigenous species, therefore we probably spare ourselves from worrying about their direct impact on local community.</font>
<br>
<br>
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/b5/TCU_ws5.JPG">
 
-
<br><font size=3>↑Plasmid isolation</font>
 
<br>
<br>
 +
<br><font color="#000000" size=3><b>2. Will the indigenous plant species acquire the transgene?</b>
 +
<br>It is widely accepted that genes can be transferred from crops to their wild relatives[1].  The resulting hybridization, if followed by polyploidization, can stabilize and keep the gene in the population. Changes in relative fitness of this genetic transfer and the potential ecological consequences, as well as how to streamline decision-making processes for transgenes that could cause unwanted ecological change, has becoming an emerging focus of research [2].</font>
<br>
<br>
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0d/TCU_ws3.JPG">
 
-
<br><font size=3>↑Ting-ting is assisting the participant to add TBE buffer</font>
 
<br>
<br>
 +
<br><font color="#000000" size=3><b>3. Will the transgenic plants affect the insect community?</b>
 +
<br>The strategic use of transgene, for example Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), to help the crop ward off insect pest has been successful. The use of Bt crops results in significant reductions of insecticide use, which is beneficial to the environment [3]. However, they also found changes in insect community composition, in that abundance of some beneficial insects increased. More research effort is needed to clarify and calculate the risk.</font>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br><font color="#000000" size=3><b>4. Will the transgene affects the plant-microbe interaction?</b>
 +
<br>Highly diversified microbiota can be seen in plant rhizosphere, and is known to be affected by root/plant physiology. A study has shown that cultivating Bt cotton did not adversely affect the soil microbiota [4]. However another study using genetically modified poplar detected changes in microbial composition [5]. GMC affected growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and may affect fungal diversity after long-term cultivation [6]. Still, more research effort is needed to clarify and calculate the risk.</font>
 +
-
</html>
+
 
 +
<br><br>
 +
<br><font color="#000000" size=4><b>References</b></font>
 +
<br><b>1.</b>Raven PH. Does the use of transgenic plants diminish or promote biodiversity? N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):528-33. Epub 2010 Aug 1. Review. PubMed PMID: 20678596.
 +
<br><b>2.</b>Wilkinson M, Tepfer M. Fitness and beyond: preparing for the arrival of GM crops with ecologically important novel characters. Environ Biosafety Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;8(1):1-14. Epub 2009 May 7. PubMed PMID: 19419648.
 +
<br><b>3.</b>Yu HL, Li YH, Wu KM. Risk assessment and ecological effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on non-target organisms. J Integr Plant Biol. 2011 Jul;53(7):520-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01047.x. PubMed PMID: 21564541.
 +
<br><b>4.</b>Kapur M, Bhatia R, Pandey G, Pandey J, Paul D, Jain RK. A case study for assessment of microbial community dynamics in genetically modified Bt cotton crop fields. Curr Microbiol. 2010 Aug;61(2):118-24. Epub 2010 Jan 23. PubMed PMID: 20098990.
 +
<br><b>5.</b>Hur M, Kim Y, Song HR, Kim JM, Choi YI, Yi H. Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep 2. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21890678.
 +
<br><b>6.</b>Liu W. Do genetically modified plants impact arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? Ecotoxicology. 2010 Feb;19(2):229-38. Epub 2009 Oct 6. PubMed PMID: 19806453.

Latest revision as of 00:03, 6 October 2011

Chen1.jpg

A review written by Dr. Chen Chun-Yao

Prof. Chun-Yao Chen



PhD in Comparative Biology
Cornell University, USA

Associate Professor
Department of Life Sciences
Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
Field : Bacteriology, Microbiology, Ecology

Is genetically modified crop (GMC) ecologically safe? More research is needed.
Chun-Yao Chen, Department of Life Science, Tzu-Chi University

This issue can be examined at four levels.


1. Will the GMC survive and outcompete local plants?
These crop species are generally less fit in the environments when compared with the indigenous species, therefore we probably spare ourselves from worrying about their direct impact on local community.



2. Will the indigenous plant species acquire the transgene?
It is widely accepted that genes can be transferred from crops to their wild relatives[1]. The resulting hybridization, if followed by polyploidization, can stabilize and keep the gene in the population. Changes in relative fitness of this genetic transfer and the potential ecological consequences, as well as how to streamline decision-making processes for transgenes that could cause unwanted ecological change, has becoming an emerging focus of research [2].



3. Will the transgenic plants affect the insect community?
The strategic use of transgene, for example Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), to help the crop ward off insect pest has been successful. The use of Bt crops results in significant reductions of insecticide use, which is beneficial to the environment [3]. However, they also found changes in insect community composition, in that abundance of some beneficial insects increased. More research effort is needed to clarify and calculate the risk.



4. Will the transgene affects the plant-microbe interaction?
Highly diversified microbiota can be seen in plant rhizosphere, and is known to be affected by root/plant physiology. A study has shown that cultivating Bt cotton did not adversely affect the soil microbiota [4]. However another study using genetically modified poplar detected changes in microbial composition [5]. GMC affected growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and may affect fungal diversity after long-term cultivation [6]. Still, more research effort is needed to clarify and calculate the risk.





References
1.Raven PH. Does the use of transgenic plants diminish or promote biodiversity? N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):528-33. Epub 2010 Aug 1. Review. PubMed PMID: 20678596.
2.Wilkinson M, Tepfer M. Fitness and beyond: preparing for the arrival of GM crops with ecologically important novel characters. Environ Biosafety Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;8(1):1-14. Epub 2009 May 7. PubMed PMID: 19419648.
3.Yu HL, Li YH, Wu KM. Risk assessment and ecological effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on non-target organisms. J Integr Plant Biol. 2011 Jul;53(7):520-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01047.x. PubMed PMID: 21564541.
4.Kapur M, Bhatia R, Pandey G, Pandey J, Paul D, Jain RK. A case study for assessment of microbial community dynamics in genetically modified Bt cotton crop fields. Curr Microbiol. 2010 Aug;61(2):118-24. Epub 2010 Jan 23. PubMed PMID: 20098990.
5.Hur M, Kim Y, Song HR, Kim JM, Choi YI, Yi H. Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep 2. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21890678.
6.Liu W. Do genetically modified plants impact arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? Ecotoxicology. 2010 Feb;19(2):229-38. Epub 2009 Oct 6. PubMed PMID: 19806453.