Team:NCTU Formosa/safty

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 337: Line 337:
     <ol type="lower-alpha">
     <ol type="lower-alpha">
       <li>Risks to the safety and health of team members or others in the lab?<br>
       <li>Risks to the safety and health of team members or others in the lab?<br>
-
         <dl> No, we did our work under the control, and all team members follow the lab rules. Therefore, in fact, we did not get hurt during working.</dl>
+
         <dl><p>No, we did our work under the control, and all team members follow the lab rules. Therefore, in fact, we did not get hurt during working.</p></dl>
       <li>Risks to the safety and health of the general public if released by design or accident?</li>
       <li>Risks to the safety and health of the general public if released by design or accident?</li>
         <dl> No, our work also is harmless to the public and the environment. After we had finished our progress for a day or a step, we always dealt with the contaminated trash carefully, and the trash is disposed of after sterilization. It is the most important in our work.</dl>
         <dl> No, our work also is harmless to the public and the environment. After we had finished our progress for a day or a step, we always dealt with the contaminated trash carefully, and the trash is disposed of after sterilization. It is the most important in our work.</dl>
Line 343: Line 343:
         <dl> No,  We only worked with non-hazardous, non-infectious, commonly used and accepted bacteria strains. Even releasing by accident will not cause risk to environment.  All work was conducted in a biosafety level S1 laboratory. Rules of best microbiological practices were applied.</dl>  
         <dl> No,  We only worked with non-hazardous, non-infectious, commonly used and accepted bacteria strains. Even releasing by accident will not cause risk to environment.  All work was conducted in a biosafety level S1 laboratory. Rules of best microbiological practices were applied.</dl>  
       <li>Risks to security through malicious misuse by individuals, groups or states?</li>
       <li>Risks to security through malicious misuse by individuals, groups or states?</li>
-
 
+
        <dl><p>No, almost Biobricks we used are from MIT, and only something new we made and modified from previous Biobricks in 2010 iGEM works or clone by ourselves. Actually, these new and old Biobricks are very safe. Our progress is to build up a new control mechanism. These new mechanism is about temperature, and is safe. There is no method for others to use maliciously.<br></p>
 +
<p>Please explain your responses (whether yes or no) to these questions.<br>
 +
Specifically, are any parts or devices in your project associated with (or known to cause):<br>- pathogenicity, infectivity, or toxicity?<br>- threats to environmental quality?<br>- security concerns?</p></dl> 
</ol>
</ol>

Revision as of 17:05, 1 October 2011



Safety And Security Questions

  1. Would the materials used in your project and/or your final product pose:

    1. Risks to the safety and health of team members or others in the lab?

      No, we did our work under the control, and all team members follow the lab rules. Therefore, in fact, we did not get hurt during working.

    2. Risks to the safety and health of the general public if released by design or accident?
    3. No, our work also is harmless to the public and the environment. After we had finished our progress for a day or a step, we always dealt with the contaminated trash carefully, and the trash is disposed of after sterilization. It is the most important in our work.
    4. Risks to environmental quality if released by design or accident?
    5. No, We only worked with non-hazardous, non-infectious, commonly used and accepted bacteria strains. Even releasing by accident will not cause risk to environment. All work was conducted in a biosafety level S1 laboratory. Rules of best microbiological practices were applied.
    6. Risks to security through malicious misuse by individuals, groups or states?
    7. No, almost Biobricks we used are from MIT, and only something new we made and modified from previous Biobricks in 2010 iGEM works or clone by ourselves. Actually, these new and old Biobricks are very safe. Our progress is to build up a new control mechanism. These new mechanism is about temperature, and is safe. There is no method for others to use maliciously.

      Please explain your responses (whether yes or no) to these questions.
      Specifically, are any parts or devices in your project associated with (or known to cause):
      - pathogenicity, infectivity, or toxicity?
      - threats to environmental quality?
      - security concerns?