"
Team:Korea U Seoul/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
(→Safety) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | {{:Team:Korea_U_Seoul/template/banner}} | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
{|align="justify" | {|align="justify" | ||
| Line 36: | Line 18: | ||
!align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul|Home]] | !align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul|Home]] | ||
!align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul/Team|Team]] | !align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul/Team|Team]] | ||
| - | !align="center"|[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year= | + | !align="center"|[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2011&team_name=Korea_U_Seoul Official Team Profile] |
!align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul/Project|Project]] | !align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul/Project|Project]] | ||
!align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul/Parts|Parts Submitted to the Registry]] | !align="center"|[[Team:Korea_U_Seoul/Parts|Parts Submitted to the Registry]] | ||
| Line 55: | Line 37: | ||
<li>Environmental safety | <li>Environmental safety | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| - | Species of microorganisms we are going to culture or | + | NO, there are no safety issues raised from our experiment. Species of microorganisms we are going to culture or extract certain parts of genes are ''E. coli'', ''Vibrio harveyi'', and species of cyanobacteria. Our project does NOT handle any pathogen, toxin or infectious materials. Only carefully planned experiments and protocols will be done in the laboratory so that the possibility of microorganisms exposed to the environment undergoing transition of recombinant DNA is eliminated. Waste from the lab will be treated properly under the biosafety guideline and be discarded, preventing pollution. During our work and research in the lab, we will put on proper protective equipment when it is necessary. Also, our team will be supervised by experienced advisors.</p> |
| - | + | ||
| - | During our | + | |
| - | </p> | + | |
<hr size="1" noshade width="99%"> | <hr size="1" noshade width="99%"> | ||
<h4> <font color="green"> Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, | <h4> <font color="green"> Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, | ||
| Line 65: | Line 44: | ||
How could other teams learn from your experience? </font> </h4> | How could other teams learn from your experience? </font> </h4> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| - | We do | + | We do NOT have safety issues related to the biobrick parts we are planning to make, yet. Though, in the worst situation, our plan changed to reset the protocol, no safety issues will be raise relevant to biobrick parts. All of our biobrick parts came from authorized organization. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<hr size="1" noshade width="99%"> | <hr size="1" noshade width="99%"> | ||
| Line 72: | Line 51: | ||
If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country? </font> </h4> | If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country? </font> </h4> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| - | + | YES, Biosafety Board exists in the Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University. Protocols and experiments in the laboratory are done under the guideline given by the board and also follow WHO Laboratory Biosafety Manual since there is no national guideline for biosafety yet in Korea. </p> | |
| - | </p> | + | <p> Please visit this website.</p> |
| + | <li> <p> Rules http://www.korea.ac.kr/content/K/K6_2.jsp (Korean) </p> | ||
| + | <li> <p> Safety and Security http://kusafe.korea.ac.kr/main.asp (Korean)</p> | ||
| + | |||
<hr size="1" noshade width="99%"> | <hr size="1" noshade width="99%"> | ||
<h4> <font color="green"> Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </font> </h4> | <h4> <font color="green"> Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </font> </h4> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| - | Giving a chance to choose protocols, experiment methods and chemical reagents to achieve each team's goal is very important issue and therefore, restricting range of choice should be avoided. Most of teams participating iGEM competition | + | Giving a chance to choose protocols, experiment methods and chemical reagents to achieve each team's goal is very important issue and therefore, restricting range of choice should be avoided. Most of the teams participating in iGEM competition are aided by one or more advisors and the advisors are experts in their field of study. Every one of the advisors will have qualified abilities and experiences to guide their team safely through problems. We suggest that iGEM committee emphasize the importance of safety rules to advisors so that they may educate their undergrads of the rules. |
| + | </p> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 September 2011
| You can write a background of your team here. Give us a background of your team, the members, etc. Or tell us more about something of your choosing. |  |
|
Tell us more about your project. Give us background. Use this is the abstract of your project. Be descriptive but concise (1-2 paragraphs) | File:Korea U Seoul team.png Your team picture |
| Team Example |
| Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Notebook | Safety | Attributions |
|---|
Safety
Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
- Researcher safety
- Public safety
- Environmental safety
NO, there are no safety issues raised from our experiment. Species of microorganisms we are going to culture or extract certain parts of genes are E. coli, Vibrio harveyi, and species of cyanobacteria. Our project does NOT handle any pathogen, toxin or infectious materials. Only carefully planned experiments and protocols will be done in the laboratory so that the possibility of microorganisms exposed to the environment undergoing transition of recombinant DNA is eliminated. Waste from the lab will be treated properly under the biosafety guideline and be discarded, preventing pollution. During our work and research in the lab, we will put on proper protective equipment when it is necessary. Also, our team will be supervised by experienced advisors.
Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?
We do NOT have safety issues related to the biobrick parts we are planning to make, yet. Though, in the worst situation, our plan changed to reset the protocol, no safety issues will be raise relevant to biobrick parts. All of our biobrick parts came from authorized organization.
Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
YES, Biosafety Board exists in the Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University. Protocols and experiments in the laboratory are done under the guideline given by the board and also follow WHO Laboratory Biosafety Manual since there is no national guideline for biosafety yet in Korea.
Please visit this website.
-
Rules http://www.korea.ac.kr/content/K/K6_2.jsp (Korean)
-
Safety and Security http://kusafe.korea.ac.kr/main.asp (Korean)
Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
Giving a chance to choose protocols, experiment methods and chemical reagents to achieve each team's goal is very important issue and therefore, restricting range of choice should be avoided. Most of the teams participating in iGEM competition are aided by one or more advisors and the advisors are experts in their field of study. Every one of the advisors will have qualified abilities and experiences to guide their team safely through problems. We suggest that iGEM committee emphasize the importance of safety rules to advisors so that they may educate their undergrads of the rules.
