Team:UTP-Panama/Results

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Discussion of Results)
(→Discussion of Results)
Line 14: Line 14:
==Discussion of Results==
==Discussion of Results==
As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C.<br>
As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C.<br>
-
The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than our device (expected to work better).<br>
+
The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than the BBa_410000 and our device (expected to work better).<br>
Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock.
Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock.

Revision as of 04:56, 29 September 2011

DSCF7003.jpg

Logoigempeginav1.png

Home

The Team

The Project

Parts

Project & Experiments Design

Human Practices

Notebook

Gallery

Safety

Data Page

Sponsors

Center



Spectrophotometry Results



Uno.jpg
Dos.jpg
• It grows well @23°C (best in Minimal Media than LB)
• It shows almost no growth @8°C

Tres.jpg

Discussion of Results

As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C.
The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than the BBa_410000 and our device (expected to work better).

Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock.

The next step in our project:
Continuing with our original design, we are are planning to use another promoter (CspA in stead of HybB). We will keep experimenting with our device.

Graphs:

Untitled35.jpg
Untitled45.jpg
Untitled33.jpg
Retrieved from "http://2011.igem.org/Team:UTP-Panama/Results"