Team:UTP-Panama/Results
From 2011.igem.org
(→Discussion of Results) |
(→Discussion of Results) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Discussion of Results== | ==Discussion of Results== | ||
- | As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, | + | As we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C.<br> |
- | The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than our device (expected to work better)<br> | + | The BBa_381001 grew well alone at 23°C, better than our device (expected to work better).<br> |
- | Looking the results for | + | Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock. |
''The next step in our project:''<br> | ''The next step in our project:''<br> | ||
- | + | Continuing with our original design, we are are planning to use another promoter (CspA in stead of HybB). | |
- | We keep experimenting | + | We will keep experimenting with our device. <br> |
== Graphs: == | == Graphs: == |
Revision as of 04:49, 29 September 2011
Home |
Spectrophotometry Results
Discussion of ResultsAs we expected, our Renbo grew well at 37°C, grew regular under cold shock stress in LB (23°C) and did not grow at 8°C. Looking at the results for BBa_410000, it decreases the capability of BBa_381001, under a cold shock.
The next step in our project: Graphs: |