Team:Virginia Tech
From 2011.igem.org
(2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<!--- Navigation Box ---> | <!--- Navigation Box ---> | ||
<!-- baltimore's box style: "background-color:#7998AD;" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="0" bordercolor="#fff" width="924px" align="center" --> | <!-- baltimore's box style: "background-color:#7998AD;" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="0" bordercolor="#fff" width="924px" align="center" --> | ||
- | {| style=" | + | {| style=" background-color:#800000;" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="5" border="0" width="90%" align="center" |
- | |||
- | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech|Home]] | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech|<span style="color:orange;">Home</span>]] |
- | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Team|Team]] | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Team|<span style="color:orange;">Team</span>]] |
- | !align="center"|[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2011&team_name=Virginia_Tech Official Team Profile] | + | !align="center"|[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2011&team_name=Virginia_Tech <span style="color:orange;">Official Team Profile</span>] |
- | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Project|Project]] | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Project|<span style="color:orange;">Project</span>]] |
- | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Parts|Parts Submitted to the Registry]] | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Parts|<span style="color:orange;">Parts Submitted to the Registry</span>]] |
- | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Notebook|Notebook]] | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Notebook|<span style="color:orange;">Notebook</span>]] |
- | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Safety|Safety]] | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Safety|<span style="color:orange;">Safety</span>]] |
- | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Attributions|Attributions]] | + | !align="center"|[[Team:Virginia_Tech/Attributions|<span style="color:orange;">Attributions</span>]] |
|} | |} | ||
- | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Line 30: | Line 28: | ||
<h3>Characterization of Fluorescent Reporters:</h3> | <h3>Characterization of Fluorescent Reporters:</h3> | ||
- | [[File: | + | [[File:kahn_fl_image.jpg|250 px|right]] |
Fluorescent proteins have become ubiquitous tools for studying cellular processes, and are frequently used to visualize the dynamics of synthetic networks in cells. To be particularly effective for these applications, fluorescent proteins must feature fast maturation and degradation rates, and these rates must be well-characterized and documented. The 2011 VT iGEM team has worked to find and characterize fluorescent proteins and degradation tags that more quickly degrade them. Here, we present chemical and mathematical models based on two parameters, maturation and degradation rates, which will hopefully contribute to more quantitative characterization and usage of fluorescent reporters in the future, and will inform future efforts in parts characterization. In conducting our experimentation, we tested different fluorescent proteins with degradation tags in <i>Escherichia coli </i> and <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> using automated fluorescent microscopy techniques, and then worked to determine a comprehensive, accurate mathematical basis for fluorescent protein characterization. | Fluorescent proteins have become ubiquitous tools for studying cellular processes, and are frequently used to visualize the dynamics of synthetic networks in cells. To be particularly effective for these applications, fluorescent proteins must feature fast maturation and degradation rates, and these rates must be well-characterized and documented. The 2011 VT iGEM team has worked to find and characterize fluorescent proteins and degradation tags that more quickly degrade them. Here, we present chemical and mathematical models based on two parameters, maturation and degradation rates, which will hopefully contribute to more quantitative characterization and usage of fluorescent reporters in the future, and will inform future efforts in parts characterization. In conducting our experimentation, we tested different fluorescent proteins with degradation tags in <i>Escherichia coli </i> and <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> using automated fluorescent microscopy techniques, and then worked to determine a comprehensive, accurate mathematical basis for fluorescent protein characterization. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:17, 29 September 2011
Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Notebook | Safety | Attributions |
---|