Team:Queens Canada/Safety/Bioterrorism
From 2011.igem.org
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<regulartext> Safety to both iGEM researchers and the general public has been a concept stressed throughout iGEM 2011. When examining biobricks, teams are encouraged to question the possibilities of potential misuse and the threat to security. A common argument is that researchers, such as iGEM participants, cannot be responsible for the modification of their biobricks for malicious misuse or the general approach to making synthetic biology more accessible. </regulartext> <p> | <regulartext> Safety to both iGEM researchers and the general public has been a concept stressed throughout iGEM 2011. When examining biobricks, teams are encouraged to question the possibilities of potential misuse and the threat to security. A common argument is that researchers, such as iGEM participants, cannot be responsible for the modification of their biobricks for malicious misuse or the general approach to making synthetic biology more accessible. </regulartext> <p> | ||
- | <regulartext> Our 2011 team was interested in exploring the possibilities of potential misuse in much greater detail. As a new approach to human practices, we examined the threat of, and response to, synthetic biology under malicious intent, or bioterrorism. </regulartext> | + | <regulartext> Our 2011 team was interested in exploring the possibilities of potential misuse in much greater detail. As a new approach to human practices, we examined the threat of, and response to, synthetic biology under malicious intent, or bioterrorism. </regulartext> <p> |
<regulartext> <b>Disclaimer </b> </regulartext> | <regulartext> <b>Disclaimer </b> </regulartext> |
Revision as of 14:07, 28 September 2011