Team:WITS-CSIR SA/Project/Concept

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 112: Line 112:
                     <div data-dojo-type="dijit.layout.ContentPane" data-dojo-props="region: 'center'">
                     <div data-dojo-type="dijit.layout.ContentPane" data-dojo-props="region: 'center'">
                         <div style="height: 100%; overflow-y: auto;">
                         <div style="height: 100%; overflow-y: auto;">
-
                             <div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'Project Introduction'">
+
                             <div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'Introduction'">
-
<p>The team this year has decided to create a microscopic biological communication network, in which there will be the transfer of data between bacterial populations as chemical signals. “Biotweet” provides a generic framework that will serve as the basis for the functioning of complex biological communication networks. This framework may be useful in various applications, including those of the medical and industrial sectors. </p>
+
<p>The WITS_CSIR_SA iGEM 2011 team decided to create a microscopic biological communication network, in which there will be the transfer of data between bacterial populations as chemical signals. This type of system has been dubbed “Biotweet”. The generic framework of “Biotweet” may serve as the basis for the functioning of complex biological communication networks and may be useful in various applications, including those of the medical and industrial sectors.</p>
-
<p>An integral component of any network is the establishment of the connections between the nodes of the network. These allow for the directed transport of data packets between specific nodes. We have, therefore, focused our efforts on constructing these abstract connections that would exist in our biological network: a challenging task, considering that bacterial cells cannot be linked by wires. Analogous to the transfer of data as electronic packets in a computer network, the concept of engineering bacteria to transport packets of chemical signals between bacterial populations arose. In this way, the bacteria themselves can form the network connections. In order to do this, we decided to reprogram the motility of bacteria, so that they will travel in a stimulus-directed fashion to points of the network, where they can send and receive signals. To ensure that the bacteria do not take a detour, and lose the data in the event that they encounter a natural stimulus, the stimuli that induce this chemotactic response would need to be specific to the application of the network and new to the bacteria. With these specifications in mind, we needed a way of manipulating the chemotaxis of bacteria that would allow for us to easily adapt the bacterial chemotactic response to the stimuli associated with any application.</p>
+
</div>
-
<p>We have therefore chosen to use riboswitches to control the expression of the flagella rotation regulator protein CheZ (Fig 1), and ultimately bacterial chemotaxis (Topps and Gallivan, 2007).</p>
+
<div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'Biotweet: A framework for bacterial networks using programmed bacterial motility '">
-
<p> Riboswitches are ligand-inducible RNA protein expression regulators that are comprised of an aptamer domain and an expression platform (Gallivan, 2007). The aptamer is a sequence of nucleotides that is designed to specifically bind to ligands, while the expression platform consists of a ribosome binding site (RBS) and a downstream gene. When the specific ligand binds to the aptamer domain, the riboswitch undergoes a structural change. This results in the exposure of the RBS (that is otherwise hidden) and the expression of the downstream gene (Gallivan, 2007). Using this riboswitch mechanism, the expression of CheZ can be regulated in a ligand concentration-dependent manner, outside the control of the natural chemotaxis pathway. Topps and Gallivan (2007) demonstrated that these riboswitches can be used to reprogram the chemotactic response of bacteria, so that they move up a concentration gradient, towards the source of the stimulus that activates the riboswitch. This process is called pseudotaxis. By using these riboswitches, bacteria can theoretically be reprogrammed to respond to any stimulus, if the appropriate riboswitch is made. This provides the versatility needed for biological network connections to be established in any application. Furthermore, this eliminates the need to engineer novel chemoreceptors, which is particularly challenging due to the complexities that occur at the interface between the new chemoreceptor and the already existing downstream signalling proteins (Topps and Gallivan, 2007).</p>
+
Any network requires the establishment of connections between nodes of the network, allowing for the transport of node-to-node data packets. With “Biotweet”, we have attemptedto construct such a network within a biological network: a challenging task, considering that bacterial cells cannot be linked by wires. Analogous to the transfer of data as electronic packets in a computer network, the concept of engineering bacteria to transport packets of chemical signals between bacterial populations arose. In this way, the bacteria themselves can form the network connections. In order to do this, we decided to reprogram the motility of bacteria, such that each bacterium travels in a stimulus-directed fashion (eg. chemotactic response) to specific points of the network (the nodes), where they can send and receive signals. Such a stimulus should be unique to the bacterium and not be part of the natural environment. With these specifications in mind, we needed a way of manipulating the chemotactic behaviour of bacteria that would allow for us to easily adapt the bacterial chemotactic response to the stimuli associated with any application. Specifically, the chemotactic response in E.coli lends itself to easy manipulation. The activation of CheZ allows for counter-clockwise (CCW) flagellar activity resulting in a “run and tumble” movement. By linking CheZ expression to post-transcriptional activation by a specific anayte (using for example a analyte-specific riboswitch), bacterial motility can be guided and controlled (Fig.1). For more on bacterial chemotaxis,<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:WITS-CSIR_SA/Project/Motility">See here</a> </p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d2/Wits_Overview_Riboswitch_in_Bacteria.jpg">
-
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/b4/Wits_Project_Introduction_Riboswitches.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/7b/Wits_Project_Introduction_Riboswitches_Small.jpg"></a>
 
-
<p>Fig 1: The different domains of a riboswitch and the conformational changes involved in its activation (Topps and Gallivan, 2007)</p>
+
<p>Fig 1.The reprogramming of bacterial chemotactic response by using post-transcriptional activation of CheZ using a analyte-responsive riboswitch. CheZ expression results in counter-clockwise flagellar rotation and a “run and tumble” movement.
-
<p>As a proof of concept, the team has designed three genetic constructs that make use of the concept of riboswitches and toggle switches. The aim was to reprogram E. coli cells, so that they search an area, localise to the riboswitch activator and return to a set location where they can report on their findings (Fig 2). This, in principle, will show that bacteria can be programmed to move in a directed manner towards a new stimulus and establish a connection between two points in space.</p>
+
</p>
-
 
+
-
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/70/Wits_Project_Introduction_Gradient.jpg">
+
-
 
+
-
<p>Fig 2: Schematic of a “send and return” system using engineered bacteria</p>
+
</div>
</div>
<br/>
<br/>
 +
<div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'Designing a controlled chemotactic motility module'">
 +
<p>Firstly, we have chosen to use artificial riboswitches to control the expression of the flagella rotation regulator protein CheZ. To do this, we borrowed heavily from studies which have described riboswitch-controlled bacterial chemotaxis(Topps and Gallivan. 2007).Riboswitches are ligand-inducible RNA protein expression regulators that are comprised of an aptamer domain and an expression platform (Gallivan, 2007). The aptamer is a sequence of nucleotides that is designed to specifically bind to ligands, while the expression platform consists of a ribosome binding site (RBS) and a downstream coding region (CDS). When the specific ligand or analyte binds to the aptamer domain, the riboswitch undergoes a structural change. This results in the exposure of the RBS and the expression of the downstream CDS (Fig.2). Using this riboswitch mechanism, the expression of CheZ can be regulated in a ligand concentration-dependent manner, outside the control of the natural chemotaxis pathway (Fig2, bottom panel and right). Topps and Gallivan (2007) demonstrated that these riboswitches can be used to reprogram the chemotactic response of bacteria, so that they move up a concentration gradient, towards the source of the stimulus that activates the riboswitch (a process known aspseudotaxis). Bacteria can theoretically be reprogrammed to respond to any stimulus, if the appropriate riboswitch is made. This provides the versatility needed for biological network connections to be established in any application. Furthermore, this eliminates the need to engineer novel chemoreceptors.</p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/5c/Wits_Overview_Riboswitches_and_Gradient_circle.jpg">
 +
 +
                             <div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'References'">
                             <div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'References'">
<p>Gallivan JP. Toward reprogramming bacteria with small molecules and RNA. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2007;11:612-9</p>
<p>Gallivan JP. Toward reprogramming bacteria with small molecules and RNA. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2007;11:612-9</p>

Revision as of 22:24, 19 September 2011

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Biotweet - Concept

sidebar

The WITS_CSIR_SA iGEM 2011 team decided to create a microscopic biological communication network, in which there will be the transfer of data between bacterial populations as chemical signals. This type of system has been dubbed “Biotweet”. The generic framework of “Biotweet” may serve as the basis for the functioning of complex biological communication networks and may be useful in various applications, including those of the medical and industrial sectors.

Any network requires the establishment of connections between nodes of the network, allowing for the transport of node-to-node data packets. With “Biotweet”, we have attemptedto construct such a network within a biological network: a challenging task, considering that bacterial cells cannot be linked by wires. Analogous to the transfer of data as electronic packets in a computer network, the concept of engineering bacteria to transport packets of chemical signals between bacterial populations arose. In this way, the bacteria themselves can form the network connections. In order to do this, we decided to reprogram the motility of bacteria, such that each bacterium travels in a stimulus-directed fashion (eg. chemotactic response) to specific points of the network (the nodes), where they can send and receive signals. Such a stimulus should be unique to the bacterium and not be part of the natural environment. With these specifications in mind, we needed a way of manipulating the chemotactic behaviour of bacteria that would allow for us to easily adapt the bacterial chemotactic response to the stimuli associated with any application. Specifically, the chemotactic response in E.coli lends itself to easy manipulation. The activation of CheZ allows for counter-clockwise (CCW) flagellar activity resulting in a “run and tumble” movement. By linking CheZ expression to post-transcriptional activation by a specific anayte (using for example a analyte-specific riboswitch), bacterial motility can be guided and controlled (Fig.1). For more on bacterial chemotaxis,See here

Fig 1.The reprogramming of bacterial chemotactic response by using post-transcriptional activation of CheZ using a analyte-responsive riboswitch. CheZ expression results in counter-clockwise flagellar rotation and a “run and tumble” movement.


Firstly, we have chosen to use artificial riboswitches to control the expression of the flagella rotation regulator protein CheZ. To do this, we borrowed heavily from studies which have described riboswitch-controlled bacterial chemotaxis(Topps and Gallivan. 2007).Riboswitches are ligand-inducible RNA protein expression regulators that are comprised of an aptamer domain and an expression platform (Gallivan, 2007). The aptamer is a sequence of nucleotides that is designed to specifically bind to ligands, while the expression platform consists of a ribosome binding site (RBS) and a downstream coding region (CDS). When the specific ligand or analyte binds to the aptamer domain, the riboswitch undergoes a structural change. This results in the exposure of the RBS and the expression of the downstream CDS (Fig.2). Using this riboswitch mechanism, the expression of CheZ can be regulated in a ligand concentration-dependent manner, outside the control of the natural chemotaxis pathway (Fig2, bottom panel and right). Topps and Gallivan (2007) demonstrated that these riboswitches can be used to reprogram the chemotactic response of bacteria, so that they move up a concentration gradient, towards the source of the stimulus that activates the riboswitch (a process known aspseudotaxis). Bacteria can theoretically be reprogrammed to respond to any stimulus, if the appropriate riboswitch is made. This provides the versatility needed for biological network connections to be established in any application. Furthermore, this eliminates the need to engineer novel chemoreceptors.

Gallivan JP. Toward reprogramming bacteria with small molecules and RNA. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2007;11:612-9

Topp S, Gallivan JP. Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129:6807-11.