Team:TU Munich/lab/notebook/solidmatrix

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(14 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<html>
<html>
-
<div class="ui-corner-all subcontent">
+
<script src="https://2011.igem.org/Team:TU_Munich/slimbox2.js?action=raw&ctype=text/js" type="text/javascript"></script>
-
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Preliminary_Experiment_1:_The_Search_For_The_Perfect_Solid_Medium_.28most_work_done_by_Thorsten.2C_Anna.2C_Simon.29"><b>Preliminary Experiment 1: The Search For The Perfect Solid Medium</b> (most work done by Thorsten, Anna, Simon)</span></h2>
+
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:TU_Munich/slimbox2.css?action=raw&ctype=text/css" type="text/css" media="screen"></link>
-
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="04-11-2011">04-11-2011</span></h3>
+
<div class="ui-corner-all subcontent tabcontent">
-
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="light_transmission_of_solid_agar.2C_different_agar_concentrations_and_growth_media">light transmission of solid agar, different agar concentrations and growth media</span></h4>
+
<h1><span class="mw-headline" id="Preliminary_Experiment_1:_The_Search_For_The_Perfect_Solid_Medium_.28Thorsten.2C_Anna.2C_Simon.29">Preliminary: The Search For The Perfect Solid Medium </span></h1>
-
<p>Purpose:
+
<p><b>People: Thorsten, Anna, Simon</b></p>
-
</p><p>In order to create the 3D-Printer based on a double-light-sensitive-promotor, it is not only necessary to immobilize the cells within a solid medium but also to be able to induce the protein expression at a definied spot. Thus, we want to examine the light transmission properties of different solid media.
+
<br>
-
</p><p>Procedure:
+
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="11-04-2011">11-04-2011</span></h2>
-
</p><p>To gain data on the light transmission of different solid media, different compositions of media were produced and poured into 1 ml cuvettes while they were still liquid. After gelation, a transmission spectrum (230 nm - 750 nm) was recorded for each sample
+
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
-
</p><p><br />
+
<div class="otherwork">
-
Agar with LB-Medium:
+
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Light_transmission_of_solid_agar.2C_different_agar_concentrations_and_growth_media">Light transmission of solid agar, different agar concentrations and growth media</span></h4>
-
</p>
+
<p><b>Purpose:</b></p><p>In order to create the 3D-Printer based on a double-light-sensitive-promotor, it is not only necessary to immobilize the cells within a solid medium but also to be able to induce the protein expression at a definied spot. Thus, we want to examine the light transmission properties of different solid media.</p><p><b>Procedure:</b></p><p>To gain data on the light transmission of different solid media, different compositions of media were produced and poured into 1 ml cuvettes while they were still liquid. After gelation, a transmission spectrum (230 nm - 750 nm) was recorded for each sample</p><p><br />
 +
Agar with LB-Medium:</p>
<table>
<table>
<tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>Agar-concentration [w/v] </i>
<td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>Agar-concentration [w/v] </i>
-
 
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>Agar-Agar [g] </i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>Agar-Agar [g] </i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>LB-Medium [ml]</i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>LB-Medium [ml]</i>
Line 24: Line 24:
<tr>
<tr>
<td>1.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.10</td><td>10</td><td>3
<td>1.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.10</td><td>10</td><td>3
-
 
</td></tr>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<tr>
Line 34: Line 33:
<tr>
<tr>
<td>2.5&nbsp;%</td><td>0.25</td><td>10</td><td>3
<td>2.5&nbsp;%</td><td>0.25</td><td>10</td><td>3
-
 
</td></tr>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>3.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.30</td><td>10</td><td>3
<td>3.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.30</td><td>10</td><td>3
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>
-
<p>Agar with M9-Medium:
+
<p>Agar with M9-Medium:</p>
-
</p>
+
<table>
<table>
<tr>
<tr>
Line 46: Line 43:
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>Agar-Agar [g] </i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>Agar-Agar [g] </i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>M9-Medium 5x [ml]</i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>M9-Medium 5x [ml]</i>
-
 
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>distilled water [ml]</i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>distilled water [ml]</i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>number of cuvettes</i>
</td><td align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"><i>number of cuvettes</i>
Line 55: Line 51:
<tr>
<tr>
<td>1.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.10</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
<td>1.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.10</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
-
 
</td></tr>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<tr>
Line 63: Line 58:
<td>2.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.20</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
<td>2.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.20</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
</td></tr>
</td></tr>
-
 
<tr>
<tr>
<td>2.5&nbsp;%</td><td>0.25</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
<td>2.5&nbsp;%</td><td>0.25</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
Line 70: Line 64:
<td>3.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.30</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
<td>3.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.30</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>
-
<p>Agarose with M9-Medium:
+
<p>Agarose with M9-Medium:</p>
-
 
+
-
</p>
+
<table>
<table>
<tr>
<tr>
Line 83: Line 75:
<tr>
<tr>
<td>0.5&nbsp;%</td><td>0.05</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>4
<td>0.5&nbsp;%</td><td>0.05</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>4
-
 
</td></tr>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>3.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.30</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
<td>3.0&nbsp;%</td><td>0.30</td><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>3
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>
-
<p><br />
+
<p><br /></p>
-
Results &amp; Discussion:
+
</div>
-
</p><p>The transmission spectra were saved locally on the lab-computer <i>(upload?)</i>
+
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
-
</p><p>LB-medium has low tranmission values at shorter wavelengths (hence its yellow appearance) and should therefore be avoided in our experiment if possible. If a clear medium (such as M9) is sufficient for our purposes it should be chosen. It has no significant absorbtion of blue light, which makes the application of a promotor sensitive to blue light feasible.  
+
<div class="results">
-
 
+
<p>The transmission spectra were saved locally on the lab-computer <i>(upload?)</i></p><p>LB-medium has low tranmission values at shorter wavelengths (hence its yellow appearance) and should therefore be avoided in our experiment if possible. If a clear medium (such as M9) is sufficient for our purposes it should be chosen. It has no significant absorbtion of blue light, which makes the application of a promotor sensitive to blue light feasible. </p><p>Gels prepared with Agarose were clearer than those prepared with Agar-Agar.</p><p>The transmission values are higher at lower concentrations of the gelling agent.</p><p><br /></p>
-
</p><p>Gels prepared with Agarose were clearer than those prepared with Agar-Agar.
+
</div>
-
</p><p>The transmission values are higher at lower concentrations of the gelling agent.
+
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
-
</p><p><br />
+
<div class="otherwork">
-
</p>
+
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Is_a_glas_or_plastic_container_neccessary_for_solid_media.3F">Is a glas or plastic container neccessary for solid media?</span></h4>
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Is_a_glas_or_plastic_container_neccessary_for_solid_media.3F">Is a glas or plastic container neccessary for solid media?</span></h4>
-
<p>Purpose:
+
<p><b>Purpose:</b></p><p>We figured that if we could do without a glas or plastic container surrounding the solid medium, this would increase the precision of our light-beam aiming at the cells that are to be induced (no light refraction at the container walls, etc.).</p><p><b>Procedure:</b></p><p>To examine if it is possible to make a detachted, self-supporting block of agar, we made a 40 ml block of 0.5&nbsp;% (w/v) Agar with M9-Medium in a small beaker glass. After the gellation process we turned it out and left it to stand over night. </p>
-
</p><p>We figured that if we could do without a glas or plastic container surrounding the solid medium, this would increase the precision of our light-beam aiming at the cells that are to be induced (no light refraction at the container walls, etc.).
+
</div>
-
</p><p>Procedure:
+
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
-
</p><p>To examine if it is possible to make a detachted, self-supporting block of agar, we made a 40 ml block of 0.5&nbsp;% (w/v) Agar with M9-Medium in a small beaker glass. After the gellation process we turned it out and left it to stand over night.  
+
<div class="results">
-
</p><p>Results &amp; Discussion:
+
<p>The block had lost a lot of water over night, so that it was standing in a puddle. Therefore it's not possible to make a detachted, self-supporting block of agar (0.5&nbsp;% w/v).</p>
-
 
+
</div>
-
</p><p>The block had lost a lot of water over night, so that it was standing in a puddle. Therefore it's not possible to make a detachted, self-supporting block of agar (0.5&nbsp;% w/v).
+
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="12-04-2011">12-04-2011</span></h2>
-
</p>
+
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Alternative_growth_media_and_gelling_agents">Alternative growth media and gelling agents</span></h4>
 +
<p><b>Purpose:</b></p><p>The purpose of this part of the experiment is to test different gelling agents known from everyday life. As it had turned out in experiment 1.1, a very clear gel is required. From cooking, we know that gelatine and jelly glaze provide quite clear gels.</p><p><b>Procedure:</b></p><p>Three different gelling agents were tested:</p><p>1) "Küchle Blitzguss", a jelly glaze that doesn't require heating</p><p>2) "RUF Tortenguss klar", a normal jelly glaze that has to be boiled</p><p>3) Gelatine</p><p><br />
 +
For each substance, three different concentrations were prepared M9:</p><p>1) according to the recipe</p><p>2) with half the amount of liquid added</p><p>3) with twice the amount of liquid added</p><p>For each of these, three cuvettes were prepared and a transmission spectrum was recorded after gelation.</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
 +
<div class="results">
 +
<p>The jelly glazes are not suitable for our purposes, because they yield very soft gels at low concentrations and very murky gels at higher concentrations.
 +
Gelatine is not a good choice either, because it takes a long time to solidify.</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Mixing_gelling_agents_with_bacterial_cultures">Mixing gelling agents with bacterial cultures</span></h4>
 +
<p>Testing of 5 different gelling agents for O2-permeability and stability mixed with B. subtilis and E. Coli. Agents were mixed with 9 ml of LB and 1 ml of liquid culture and incubated at 37° C o/n.</p><p>1) Agar-Agar 0.5&nbsp;% </p><p>2) Gelatine 1.8&nbsp;% (w/v)</p><p>3) "Blitz-Guss" 5.9&nbsp;% (w/v) cold</p><p>4) "Tortenguss" 0.9&nbsp;% (w/v) warm</p><p>5) Agarose 0,5&nbsp;%</p><p><br /></p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
 +
<div class="results">
 +
<p>Agar + B. Subtilis: upper 3 mm slightly red, gel was stable</p><p>Agar + E. Coli: Bubbles within Agar, little fluid on top, gel was stable</p><p>Gelatine + B. Subtilis: fluid and clear</p><p>Gelatine + E. Coli: fluid and little precipitations at the bottom</p><p>Blitz-Guss + B. Subtilis: fluid and unclear</p><p>Blitz-Guss + E. Coli: fluid and unclear</p><p>Tortenguss + B. Subtilis: fluid and clear</p><p>Tortenguss + E. Coli: liquid and unclear</p><p>Agarose + B. Subtilis: stable gel </p><p>Agarose + E. Coli: stable gel and little bubbles</p><p><br />
 +
conclusion:</p><p>All fluid gelling agents are not suitable. Clear gels are not suitable because no bacterial growth took place. Only Agarose and Agar-Agar remained suitable but small bubbles could be a problem. The Experiment with B. Subtilis showed that oxygen is only available in the upper 3 mm of the gels.</p><p><br /></p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="13-04-2011">13-04-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="testing_of_alternative_gelling_agent:_GELRITE">testing of alternative gelling agent: GELRITE</span></h4>
 +
<p>0,5% GELRITE in M9-medium gelled at 47° C. Clear and quite stable gel.
 +
0,25% GELRITE in M9-medium gelled at 40° C. Clear and stable gel. not stable enough without plastic borders.</p><p><br /></p>
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="light_scattering_in_gels_with_E._Coli">light scattering in gels with E. Coli</span></h4>
 +
<p>0.5&nbsp;% Agarose</p><p>0.5&nbsp;% Agar-Agar</p><p>0.5&nbsp;% GELRITE</p><p>18 ml of gelling agent was heated, cooled down to 40° C, poured into a petri dish with 1 ml AHL (final concentration in petri dish: 100 nM) and 1 ml E. Coli (express GFP with inducer AHL) culture in LB. </p><p>GELRITE gelled immediately upon contact with cold petri dish. --&gt; all components have to be warmed to aprox. 50° C</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
 +
<div class="results">
 +
<p>formation of bubbles with E.Coli
 +
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0f/Solidmatrix1.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="IMG 1725.JPG" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0f/Solidmatrix1.jpg" /></a></p><p>O2-permeation with Bacillus Subtilis
 +
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/83/Solidmatrix2.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="IMG 1729.JPG" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/83/Solidmatrix2.jpg" /></a></p><p><br />
 +
laser scattering in</p><p>Agar-Agar
 +
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/dd/Solidmatrix3.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="IMG 1735.JPG" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/dd/Solidmatrix3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Agarose
 +
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/85/Solidmatrix4.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="IMG 1731.JPG" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/8/85/Solidmatrix4.jpg" /></a></p><p>GELRITE
 +
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/65/Solidmatrix5.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="IMG 1738.JPG" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/65/Solidmatrix5.jpg" /></a></p>
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Fluorescence_measurement_of_GFP_expressing_E._Coli">Fluorescence measurement of GFP expressing E. Coli</span></h4>
 +
<p>results of Fluorescence measurement</p><p><br />
 +
Agarose: After 2 h strong fluorescent single bacteria visible. </p><p><br />
 +
Gels have been incubated at 37° C and 200 rpm o/n</p><p><br /></p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="14-04-2011">14-04-2011</span></h2>
 +
<p>GELRITE gel was damaged because of strong rotating forces.
 +
All three samples were viewed under the fluorescence microscope: Bacteria were clustered, oftentimes two next to each other (doubled?), still fluorescent (inducer works with as little as 5 nM)
 +
---&gt; bacteria alive</p>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="light_scattering_in_gels">light scattering in gels</span></h4>
 +
<p>0.25&nbsp;% GELRITE was produced:
 +
25 ml M9 and 0,15 g GELRITE was heated and then mixed with 5 ml of a dense E. Coli suspension (OD = ca. 10) in M9 and poured into a cuvette. Transmission was measured with a absorption photometer. </p><p>Quick gelling of GELRITE was again a problem. Spectra showed higher transmissions in blue and UV ranges than Agarose and Agar-Agar spectra before. A very high density of cell culture lead to a decrease in transmission of about 95%.
 +
<a href="/wiki/images/8/89/0%2C25%25_Gelrite_with-without_cells.pdf" class="internal" title="0,25% Gelrite with-without cells.pdf">Media:0,25%_Gelrite_with-without_cells.pdf‎</a></p><p>---&gt; Cells lead to a great decrease in light trasmission
 +
---&gt; we have to quantify this</p><p><br /></p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="15-04-2011">15-04-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<p>Findings from literature:
 +
M9 shouldn't be used in a lower concentration than 1 x to ensure growth of E. coli. However, 1x M9 includes a lot of salt, which leads to early gelling of GELRITE (0,5&nbsp;% GELRITE (w/v) at 47° C in 1 x M9)</p><p>-&gt; testing of different GELRITE concentrations with 1x M9</p><p>0,1&nbsp;% GELRITE with stirring: gelling at 43 - 44° C, however rather sirupy due to stirring
 +
0,1&nbsp;% GELRITE without stirring: gelling at 44° C, however not a very stable gel</p><p>-&gt; for a somewhat stable gel, 44° C is the lowest temperature in 1x M9 and GELRITE</p><p>repetition with 0,5&nbsp;% Agarose: gelling at 30° C and transmission spectrum taken
 +
-&gt; low gelling temperature but murky gel</p>
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="permeability_of_gels">permeability of gels</span></h4>
 +
<p>0,5&nbsp;% Agarose (about 10 ml) in a plastic syringe with blue water (with ink) on the top, without and with pressure -&gt; no water drops out of the syringe, even when pressure is applied (rather the gel is pressed out)
 +
-&gt; no permeability for water</p><p>0,5&nbsp;% GELRITE in the same setup over night: no permeability for water, ink diffused into the gel</p><p>inoculation of 30 ml LB medium with E. coli (BW27785) and used for experiments on 18-04-2011</p><p><br /></p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="18-04-2011">18-04-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Testing_of_Silica_Sol-Gels">Testing of Silica Sol-Gels</span></h4>
 +
<p>according to "Immobilization of bacteria in silica matrices using citric acid
 +
in the sol–gel process" Alvarez et al. (DOI 10.1007/s006-00253-0580-6)</p><p><br />
 +
6 ml of ddH2O were added to 1g silica and heated to 80° C untill full colloidal suspension was achieved. The suspension was cooled to room temperature und either pH 6.5 was set with 0.75 M citric acid or the suspension was mixed 1:1 with 1.8 x 10^8 cfu/ml E.Coli. After 2 minutes the gelling should occur.</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
 +
<div class="results">
 +
<p>It was impossible to gain homogenous gelling with both methods. Mixing with bacterial culture didnt result in gelling at all. After addition of citric acid the suspension gelled inhomogenous and immediately at basic pH values (ca. 10.2). Furthermore sol gels are not transparent enough and Transmission in blue wavelengths is low.</p><p><br /></p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="19-04-2011">19-04-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Testing_of_Silica_Sol-Gels_II">Testing of Silica Sol-Gels II</span></h4>
 +
<p>The experiment from 18-04-2011 was repeated using Natronwasserglas (silicic acid) and silicon dioxide (Kieselgel 60) according to Alvarez et al with the same results as above.</p><p><br /></p>
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Adjustment_of_E._Coli_cell_count_in_GELRITE-Gels">Adjustment of E. Coli cell count in GELRITE-Gels</span></h4>
 +
<p>Aim: maximum cell count determination as regards to transmission of visible light</p>
 +
<h5><span class="mw-headline" id="Preparation_of_0.5_.25_GELRITE-gels">Preparation of 0.5&nbsp;% GELRITE-gels</span></h5>
 +
<p>0.15 g GELRITE were added to 25 ml M9-medium. The solution was heated to aproximately 90° C (or 100% of GELRITE was dissolved) and cooled down to 50° C in a water bath. 5 ml bacterial suspension with apropriate cell count was heated to 50° C and poured imediately into the GELRITE solution. Mixture was stirred thoroughly and poured into petri dishes or cuvettes. Gelling should occur immediately after contact with cold plastic surface. (at 47° C)</p><p>Following in-gel cell counts were produced:</p><p>1x10<sup>7</sup> cells/ml: pic spectrum<br />
 +
1x10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml: pic spectrum<br />
 +
1x10<sup>9</sup> cells/ml: pic spectrum<br /></p><p><a href="/wiki/images/1/15/Variation_of_cell_density_04-11-19.jpg" class="internal" title="Variation of cell density 04-11-19.jpg">Media:Variation_of_cell_density 04-11-19.jpg</a></p><p><br /></p>
 +
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="results:">results:</span></h3>
 +
<p>Cell count has to be somewhere between 1x10<sup>8</sup> and 1x10<sup>9</sup> cells/ml in regards to efficient transmission. Space between single E. Coli cells is to high.</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="27-04-2011">27-04-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Adjustment_of_E._Coli_cell_count_in_GELRITE-Gels_II">Adjustment of E. Coli cell count in GELRITE-Gels II</span></h4>
 +
<p>A new culture of E. Coli BW27783 with Nalidixin acid resistance (Nx) was thawed (Stock 5 OD 3,66) and transferred to 45 ml LB with 50 µg/ml Nx (1:1000 dilution of stock 50 mg/ml). <br /></p><p>starting OD: 0,03 (10:30)</p><p>0.5&nbsp;% GELRITE-gels were produced as described above (19-04-2011, Preparation of 0.5&nbsp;% GELRITE-gels).</p><p>Following in-gel cell counts were produced:</p><p>2x10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml: pic spectrum<br />
 +
4x10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml: pic spectrum<br />
 +
6x10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml: pic spectrum<br />
 +
8x10<sup>8</sup> cells/ml: pic spectrum<br /></p><p><a href="/wiki/images/3/3c/Variation_of_cell_densities.jpg" class="internal" title="Variation of cell densities.jpg">Media:Variation_of_cell_densities.jpg</a></p>
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Viability_Determination_of_E._Coli_in_GELRITE-Gels">Viability Determination of E. Coli in GELRITE-Gels</span></h4>
 +
<p>aim: Determination of viable cell count(vcc) after 50° C shock in gel production process</p><p>vcc of culture: dilution series and plating on LB plates.</p><p><br />
 +
vcc of gels: 0.1g of GELRITE slices were homogenized in 0.9 ml LB and plated on LB plates.</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="28-04-2011">28-04-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
 +
<div class="results">
 +
<table class="wikitable">
 +
<tr>
 +
<th>plate dilution <br />cfu/ml wanted </th><th>1.00E-01 </th><th>1.00E-02 </th><th>1.00E-03 </th><th>1.00E-04 </th><th>1.00E-05 </th><th>1.00E-06 </th><th>1.00E-07 </th><th>1.00E-8 </th><th>cfu/ml
 +
</th></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>culture 3.93E-09 </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>n.d. </td><td>27 </td><td>5 </td><td>0 </td><td>1.93E+09
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>2.00E-08 </td><td>n.d. </td><td>n.d. </td><td>110 </td><td>5 </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>4.00E+06
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>4.00E-08 </td><td>n.d. </td><td>n.d. </td><td>210 </td><td>22 </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>1.08E+07
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>6.00E-08 </td><td>n.d. </td><td>n.d. </td><td>34 </td><td>3 </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>1.60E+06
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>8.00E-08 </td><td>6 </td><td>0 </td><td>0 </td><td>0 </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>- </td><td>3.00E+03
 +
</td></tr></table>
 +
<p><br /> </p><p><br /> </p>
 +
<table class="wikitable">
 +
<tr>
 +
<th>OD1 = 10^9 </th><th>real cfu/ml
 +
</th></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>3.93E+09 </td><td>1.93E+09
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>2.00E-08 </td><td>4.00E+06
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>4.00E-08 </td><td>1.08E+07
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>6.00E-08 </td><td>1.60E+06
 +
</td></tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>8.00E-08 </td><td>3.00E+03
 +
</td></tr></table>
 +
<p><br />
 +
Gel slices werent properly homogenized. Probably most cells survived heating step for under 1 minute duration. Cell counts 6.00E-08 and 8.00E-08 had to be heated twice due to too early gelling of GELRITE. Viable cell count decreases here significantly. </p><p>--&gt; keep heating duration as short as possible (under 1 minute)</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="22-07-2011">22-07-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Other Work</span></h3>
 +
<div class="otherwork">
 +
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="gel_with_more_components">gel with more components</span></h4>
 +
<p>Testing bacteria in the Gelrite matrix with more medium components: </p><p><br />
 +
- heat resistant E. coli  BH28 under Kan resisitance</p><p>- positive control with lacZ, induceable with Arabinose, under Amp resistance</p><p><br />
 +
0,35&nbsp;% Gelrite (for delayed gelling -&gt; did't change so much, gelling at 47 °C)</p><p>M9 medium</p><p>1 mg/ml ammonium iron sulfate</p><p>2 mg/ml arabinose</p><p>-&gt; cooked to dissolve components</p><p>bacteria (final concentration in the gel 1*10^7 bact./ml)</p><p>added with the bacteria / not cooked / heated to ca. 50 ° C in water bath:
 +
0,3 mg/ml S-Gal (from 50 mg/ml stock in DMF -&gt; stock can be found in our freezer, brownish liquid in eppi)</p><p>antibiotic 100 µg/ml Medium</p><p><br />
 +
problems: </p><p>- premature gelling</p><p>- blurry gel</p><p>- light brownish color (like S-Gal in DMF)</p><p><br /></p>
 +
</div>
 +
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="25-07-2011">25-07-2011</span></h2>
 +
<h3> <span class="mw-headline">Results</span></h3>
 +
<div class="results">
 +
<p>grey gel from induced positive control -&gt; they live! (heat resistant bat. can survive in M9)</p><p><br />
 +
Viewed gels from friday under the microscope:
 +
bacteria in both samples divided/formed colonies</p><p><br />
 +
positive control, induced with arabinose
 +
<a href="/wiki/images/4/4d/110725_20x_pos_in_gel_5.jpg" class="internal" title="110725 20x pos in gel 5.jpg">Media:110725 20x pos in gel 5.jpg</a></p><p>little green fluorescence detectable, but also in other structures like fibers...
 +
<a href="/wiki/images/6/61/110725_20x_pos_in_gel_5_GFP_2000ms.jpg" class="internal" title="110725 20x pos in gel 5 GFP 2000ms.jpg">Media:110725 20x pos in gel 5 GFP 2000ms.jpg</a></p><p><br />
 +
heat resistant BH28: green and red flourescence detectalbe!</p><p>heat resistant BH28
 +
<a href="/wiki/images/2/24/110725_20x_bh28_in_gel_4.jpg" class="internal" title="110725 20x bh28 in gel 4.jpg">Media:110725 20x bh28 in gel 4.jpg</a></p><p>heat resistant BH28 under GFP fluorescence
 +
<a href="/wiki/images/e/eb/110725_20x_bh28_in_gel_4_fluorescence_gfp.jpg" class="internal" title="110725 20x bh28 in gel 4 fluorescence gfp.jpg">Media:110725 20x bh28 in gel 4 fluorescence gfp.jpg</a></p><p>heat resistant BH28 under RFP fluorescence
 +
<a href="/wiki/images/a/a4/110725_20x_bh28_in_gel_4_fluorescence_rfp_2000ms.jpg" class="internal" title="110725 20x bh28 in gel 4 fluorescence rfp 2000ms.jpg">Media:110725 20x bh28 in gel 4 fluorescence rfp 2000ms.jpg</a></p><p><br />
 +
-&gt; idea from Bea: use S-Gal powder instead of stock solution (organic solvent may cause blurry gel)</p><p>-&gt; as bacteria suvived: mix at higher temperatures to avoid premature gelling</p>
 +
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 20:16, 28 October 2011

Preliminary: The Search For The Perfect Solid Medium

People: Thorsten, Anna, Simon


11-04-2011

Other Work

Light transmission of solid agar, different agar concentrations and growth media

Purpose:

In order to create the 3D-Printer based on a double-light-sensitive-promotor, it is not only necessary to immobilize the cells within a solid medium but also to be able to induce the protein expression at a definied spot. Thus, we want to examine the light transmission properties of different solid media.

Procedure:

To gain data on the light transmission of different solid media, different compositions of media were produced and poured into 1 ml cuvettes while they were still liquid. After gelation, a transmission spectrum (230 nm - 750 nm) was recorded for each sample


Agar with LB-Medium:

Agar-concentration [w/v] Agar-Agar [g] LB-Medium [ml] number of cuvettes
0.5 %0.05103
1.0 %0.10103
1.5 %0.15103
2.0 %0.20103
2.5 %0.25103
3.0 %0.30103

Agar with M9-Medium:

Agar-concentration [w/v] Agar-Agar [g] M9-Medium 5x [ml] distilled water [ml] number of cuvettes
0.5 %0.05284
1.0 %0.10283
1.5 %0.15283
2.0 %0.20283
2.5 %0.25283
3.0 %0.30283

Agarose with M9-Medium:

Agarose-concentration [w/v] Agarose [g] M9-Medium 5x [ml] distilled water [ml] number of cuvettes
0.5 %0.05284
3.0 %0.30283


Results

The transmission spectra were saved locally on the lab-computer (upload?)

LB-medium has low tranmission values at shorter wavelengths (hence its yellow appearance) and should therefore be avoided in our experiment if possible. If a clear medium (such as M9) is sufficient for our purposes it should be chosen. It has no significant absorbtion of blue light, which makes the application of a promotor sensitive to blue light feasible.

Gels prepared with Agarose were clearer than those prepared with Agar-Agar.

The transmission values are higher at lower concentrations of the gelling agent.


Other Work

Is a glas or plastic container neccessary for solid media?

Purpose:

We figured that if we could do without a glas or plastic container surrounding the solid medium, this would increase the precision of our light-beam aiming at the cells that are to be induced (no light refraction at the container walls, etc.).

Procedure:

To examine if it is possible to make a detachted, self-supporting block of agar, we made a 40 ml block of 0.5 % (w/v) Agar with M9-Medium in a small beaker glass. After the gellation process we turned it out and left it to stand over night.

Results

The block had lost a lot of water over night, so that it was standing in a puddle. Therefore it's not possible to make a detachted, self-supporting block of agar (0.5 % w/v).

12-04-2011

Other Work

Alternative growth media and gelling agents

Purpose:

The purpose of this part of the experiment is to test different gelling agents known from everyday life. As it had turned out in experiment 1.1, a very clear gel is required. From cooking, we know that gelatine and jelly glaze provide quite clear gels.

Procedure:

Three different gelling agents were tested:

1) "Küchle Blitzguss", a jelly glaze that doesn't require heating

2) "RUF Tortenguss klar", a normal jelly glaze that has to be boiled

3) Gelatine


For each substance, three different concentrations were prepared M9:

1) according to the recipe

2) with half the amount of liquid added

3) with twice the amount of liquid added

For each of these, three cuvettes were prepared and a transmission spectrum was recorded after gelation.

Results

The jelly glazes are not suitable for our purposes, because they yield very soft gels at low concentrations and very murky gels at higher concentrations. Gelatine is not a good choice either, because it takes a long time to solidify.

Other Work

Mixing gelling agents with bacterial cultures

Testing of 5 different gelling agents for O2-permeability and stability mixed with B. subtilis and E. Coli. Agents were mixed with 9 ml of LB and 1 ml of liquid culture and incubated at 37° C o/n.

1) Agar-Agar 0.5 %

2) Gelatine 1.8 % (w/v)

3) "Blitz-Guss" 5.9 % (w/v) cold

4) "Tortenguss" 0.9 % (w/v) warm

5) Agarose 0,5 %


Results

Agar + B. Subtilis: upper 3 mm slightly red, gel was stable

Agar + E. Coli: Bubbles within Agar, little fluid on top, gel was stable

Gelatine + B. Subtilis: fluid and clear

Gelatine + E. Coli: fluid and little precipitations at the bottom

Blitz-Guss + B. Subtilis: fluid and unclear

Blitz-Guss + E. Coli: fluid and unclear

Tortenguss + B. Subtilis: fluid and clear

Tortenguss + E. Coli: liquid and unclear

Agarose + B. Subtilis: stable gel

Agarose + E. Coli: stable gel and little bubbles


conclusion:

All fluid gelling agents are not suitable. Clear gels are not suitable because no bacterial growth took place. Only Agarose and Agar-Agar remained suitable but small bubbles could be a problem. The Experiment with B. Subtilis showed that oxygen is only available in the upper 3 mm of the gels.


13-04-2011

Other Work

testing of alternative gelling agent: GELRITE

0,5% GELRITE in M9-medium gelled at 47° C. Clear and quite stable gel. 0,25% GELRITE in M9-medium gelled at 40° C. Clear and stable gel. not stable enough without plastic borders.


light scattering in gels with E. Coli

0.5 % Agarose

0.5 % Agar-Agar

0.5 % GELRITE

18 ml of gelling agent was heated, cooled down to 40° C, poured into a petri dish with 1 ml AHL (final concentration in petri dish: 100 nM) and 1 ml E. Coli (express GFP with inducer AHL) culture in LB.

GELRITE gelled immediately upon contact with cold petri dish. --> all components have to be warmed to aprox. 50° C

Results

formation of bubbles with E.Coli IMG 1725.JPG

O2-permeation with Bacillus Subtilis IMG 1729.JPG


laser scattering in

Agar-Agar IMG 1735.JPG

Agarose IMG 1731.JPG

GELRITE IMG 1738.JPG

Fluorescence measurement of GFP expressing E. Coli

results of Fluorescence measurement


Agarose: After 2 h strong fluorescent single bacteria visible.


Gels have been incubated at 37° C and 200 rpm o/n


14-04-2011

GELRITE gel was damaged because of strong rotating forces. All three samples were viewed under the fluorescence microscope: Bacteria were clustered, oftentimes two next to each other (doubled?), still fluorescent (inducer works with as little as 5 nM) ---> bacteria alive

Other Work

light scattering in gels

0.25 % GELRITE was produced: 25 ml M9 and 0,15 g GELRITE was heated and then mixed with 5 ml of a dense E. Coli suspension (OD = ca. 10) in M9 and poured into a cuvette. Transmission was measured with a absorption photometer.

Quick gelling of GELRITE was again a problem. Spectra showed higher transmissions in blue and UV ranges than Agarose and Agar-Agar spectra before. A very high density of cell culture lead to a decrease in transmission of about 95%. Media:0,25%_Gelrite_with-without_cells.pdf‎

---> Cells lead to a great decrease in light trasmission ---> we have to quantify this


15-04-2011

Other Work

Findings from literature: M9 shouldn't be used in a lower concentration than 1 x to ensure growth of E. coli. However, 1x M9 includes a lot of salt, which leads to early gelling of GELRITE (0,5 % GELRITE (w/v) at 47° C in 1 x M9)

-> testing of different GELRITE concentrations with 1x M9

0,1 % GELRITE with stirring: gelling at 43 - 44° C, however rather sirupy due to stirring 0,1 % GELRITE without stirring: gelling at 44° C, however not a very stable gel

-> for a somewhat stable gel, 44° C is the lowest temperature in 1x M9 and GELRITE

repetition with 0,5 % Agarose: gelling at 30° C and transmission spectrum taken -> low gelling temperature but murky gel

permeability of gels

0,5 % Agarose (about 10 ml) in a plastic syringe with blue water (with ink) on the top, without and with pressure -> no water drops out of the syringe, even when pressure is applied (rather the gel is pressed out) -> no permeability for water

0,5 % GELRITE in the same setup over night: no permeability for water, ink diffused into the gel

inoculation of 30 ml LB medium with E. coli (BW27785) and used for experiments on 18-04-2011


18-04-2011

Other Work

Testing of Silica Sol-Gels

according to "Immobilization of bacteria in silica matrices using citric acid in the sol–gel process" Alvarez et al. (DOI 10.1007/s006-00253-0580-6)


6 ml of ddH2O were added to 1g silica and heated to 80° C untill full colloidal suspension was achieved. The suspension was cooled to room temperature und either pH 6.5 was set with 0.75 M citric acid or the suspension was mixed 1:1 with 1.8 x 10^8 cfu/ml E.Coli. After 2 minutes the gelling should occur.

Results

It was impossible to gain homogenous gelling with both methods. Mixing with bacterial culture didnt result in gelling at all. After addition of citric acid the suspension gelled inhomogenous and immediately at basic pH values (ca. 10.2). Furthermore sol gels are not transparent enough and Transmission in blue wavelengths is low.


19-04-2011

Other Work

Testing of Silica Sol-Gels II

The experiment from 18-04-2011 was repeated using Natronwasserglas (silicic acid) and silicon dioxide (Kieselgel 60) according to Alvarez et al with the same results as above.


Adjustment of E. Coli cell count in GELRITE-Gels

Aim: maximum cell count determination as regards to transmission of visible light

Preparation of 0.5 % GELRITE-gels

0.15 g GELRITE were added to 25 ml M9-medium. The solution was heated to aproximately 90° C (or 100% of GELRITE was dissolved) and cooled down to 50° C in a water bath. 5 ml bacterial suspension with apropriate cell count was heated to 50° C and poured imediately into the GELRITE solution. Mixture was stirred thoroughly and poured into petri dishes or cuvettes. Gelling should occur immediately after contact with cold plastic surface. (at 47° C)

Following in-gel cell counts were produced:

1x107 cells/ml: pic spectrum
1x108 cells/ml: pic spectrum
1x109 cells/ml: pic spectrum

Media:Variation_of_cell_density 04-11-19.jpg


results:

Cell count has to be somewhere between 1x108 and 1x109 cells/ml in regards to efficient transmission. Space between single E. Coli cells is to high.

27-04-2011

Other Work

Adjustment of E. Coli cell count in GELRITE-Gels II

A new culture of E. Coli BW27783 with Nalidixin acid resistance (Nx) was thawed (Stock 5 OD 3,66) and transferred to 45 ml LB with 50 µg/ml Nx (1:1000 dilution of stock 50 mg/ml).

starting OD: 0,03 (10:30)

0.5 % GELRITE-gels were produced as described above (19-04-2011, Preparation of 0.5 % GELRITE-gels).

Following in-gel cell counts were produced:

2x108 cells/ml: pic spectrum
4x108 cells/ml: pic spectrum
6x108 cells/ml: pic spectrum
8x108 cells/ml: pic spectrum

Media:Variation_of_cell_densities.jpg

Viability Determination of E. Coli in GELRITE-Gels

aim: Determination of viable cell count(vcc) after 50° C shock in gel production process

vcc of culture: dilution series and plating on LB plates.


vcc of gels: 0.1g of GELRITE slices were homogenized in 0.9 ml LB and plated on LB plates.

28-04-2011

Results

plate dilution
cfu/ml wanted
1.00E-01 1.00E-02 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 1.00E-06 1.00E-07 1.00E-8 cfu/ml
culture 3.93E-09 - - - - n.d. 27 5 0 1.93E+09
2.00E-08 n.d. n.d. 110 5 - - - - 4.00E+06
4.00E-08 n.d. n.d. 210 22 - - - - 1.08E+07
6.00E-08 n.d. n.d. 34 3 - - - - 1.60E+06
8.00E-08 6 0 0 0 - - - - 3.00E+03



OD1 = 10^9 real cfu/ml
3.93E+09 1.93E+09
2.00E-08 4.00E+06
4.00E-08 1.08E+07
6.00E-08 1.60E+06
8.00E-08 3.00E+03


Gel slices werent properly homogenized. Probably most cells survived heating step for under 1 minute duration. Cell counts 6.00E-08 and 8.00E-08 had to be heated twice due to too early gelling of GELRITE. Viable cell count decreases here significantly.

--> keep heating duration as short as possible (under 1 minute)

22-07-2011

Other Work

gel with more components

Testing bacteria in the Gelrite matrix with more medium components:


- heat resistant E. coli BH28 under Kan resisitance

- positive control with lacZ, induceable with Arabinose, under Amp resistance


0,35 % Gelrite (for delayed gelling -> did't change so much, gelling at 47 °C)

M9 medium

1 mg/ml ammonium iron sulfate

2 mg/ml arabinose

-> cooked to dissolve components

bacteria (final concentration in the gel 1*10^7 bact./ml)

added with the bacteria / not cooked / heated to ca. 50 ° C in water bath: 0,3 mg/ml S-Gal (from 50 mg/ml stock in DMF -> stock can be found in our freezer, brownish liquid in eppi)

antibiotic 100 µg/ml Medium


problems:

- premature gelling

- blurry gel

- light brownish color (like S-Gal in DMF)


25-07-2011

Results

grey gel from induced positive control -> they live! (heat resistant bat. can survive in M9)


Viewed gels from friday under the microscope: bacteria in both samples divided/formed colonies


positive control, induced with arabinose Media:110725 20x pos in gel 5.jpg

little green fluorescence detectable, but also in other structures like fibers... Media:110725 20x pos in gel 5 GFP 2000ms.jpg


heat resistant BH28: green and red flourescence detectalbe!

heat resistant BH28 Media:110725 20x bh28 in gel 4.jpg

heat resistant BH28 under GFP fluorescence Media:110725 20x bh28 in gel 4 fluorescence gfp.jpg

heat resistant BH28 under RFP fluorescence Media:110725 20x bh28 in gel 4 fluorescence rfp 2000ms.jpg


-> idea from Bea: use S-Gal powder instead of stock solution (organic solvent may cause blurry gel)

-> as bacteria suvived: mix at higher temperatures to avoid premature gelling