Team:Paris Bettencourt/Project

From 2011.igem.org

Revision as of 10:30, 5 July 2011

Overall project

We started to work on one of the most intriguing microbiology discovery of the last decade: the existence of nanotubes in Bacillus subtilis!

We decided to take advantage of an article published by Dubey and Ben-Yehuda [http://bms.ucsf.edu/sites/ucsf-bms.ixm.ca/files/marjordan_06022011.pdf] in the Journal Cell where they show an extraordinary new form of communication between Bacillus subtilis cells and even exchanges with E. coli. In the first place, we want to prove de novo what the authors found. Although some microscopy images prove solidly the existence of these said nanotubes, we aim at using synthetic biology to get a definite proof of the existence of nanotubes.

Our second aim is to caracterize the nanotubes: what passes through them and what are the typical diffusion times through the network. We will examine if RNA, proteins of different sizes and/or metabolites can pass through and with which ease and rate. For that purpose, we are going to engineer, thanks to Synthetic Biology, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioBrick BioBricks] the following general design: an emitter cell that would produce a messenger (RNA, protein etc.) that would then pass through the nanotubes and into the receiver cell. The latter, would then have specific promoters that would induce an amplification system that would in turn trigger a detection mechanism (fluroescence, others). As a general outline we will first investigate the inter-species (subtilis-coli) connection thanks to all the existing biobricks for E .coli then we will move on to an intra-species (subtilis to subtilis) connection and develop new parts specific to subtilis.

There are other aims that we are still working on such as use of this nanotube to perform more complex task (pattern formation for instance) using some more complicated genetic circuits.

Project Details

Step 0

Proof of principle: the first step is about reproducing what the authors of the original paper already did, to make sure that we can obtain the same results.

Step 0.1

Antibiotic: It has been shown that the nanotubes allow for a transient antibiotic resistance. In order to prove this part, we use two different strains of subtilis. Each strain has a different antibiotic resistance encoded and when grown together on a double selective medium colonies still form. The limitations of this simple method is that we don't know if both strains survive or only one does. Different hypothesis follow from there: either both survive because both antibiotics are exchanged or one strain only survives because one antibiotic preferentially get through the nanotubes.

Step 0.2

Simple GFP: Once again, we will re-create an experiment undertaken by the original authors. This is to mix two different strains of subtilis: one is gfp⁺ and one is gfp^-. Using an overlay of phase contrast microscopy and fluorescent microscopy we shoud be able to see which strain is which and also observe the formation of a GFP gradient. This will be a stronger statement towards the existence of the nanotubes.

Step 1

Master and slave relationships aka irreversible systems: at this point we will have re-proven the existence of the nanotubes and will know how to correctly manipulate B. subtilis, it is now time to use the BioBricks that were sent to us. In this step, we shall using two different kinds of strains