Team:Macquarie Australia/Project

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(BioBrick Construction)
m (Aims)
 
(26 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
-
Phytochromes were first discovered in plants and were found to be associated with photo-perception. The phytochrome proteins act as light sensors by absorbing red/far red light (some phytochromes can detect light between the UV-A to far-red regions). Their main function was found to mediate various time-dependant events such as seed germination, seedling de-etiolation and the generation of flowers. <br>
+
Phytochromes were first discovered in plants and were found to be associated with photo-perception - indeed, they are classed as photoreceptors. They are now known to exist in all plant species as well as some species of fungi and bacteria [2,5]. Plants use phytochromes as ambient light sensors involved for morphological development such as the germination of seeds, flower generation, responses to sunlight and position relative to shade [1,5,6,7,8,9]. Phytochrome proteins act as light sensors by absorbing red/far red light, however some phytochromes can detect light between the UV-A to far-red regions. <br><br>
-
Bacteriophytochromes act as photoreceptors for bacteria, mediating sensory responses to their light environment; the alignment of their circadian systems can function as a quorum-sensing network. Bacteriophytochromes also act as protein kinases sensitive to light. These are able to modify or regulate various components in the cell such as protein activity and the synthesis of the light harvesting complex via the promotion of transcription factors. By doing so, they create what can be thought of as a “light switch”. The light switch bacteriophytochrome that is utilised by ''Agrobacterium'' and ''Deinococcus'' has the domain structure: PAS-GAF-PHY-HisKinase, and is able to cause a shift in conformation of the chromophore complex according to the wavelength absorbed. <br>
+
Bacteriophytochromes act as photoreceptors for bacteria, mediating sensory responses to their light environment [4,6]. Bacteriophytochromes can also act as protein kinases triggered by light. These are able to modify or regulate various components in the cell such as protein activity and the synthesis of the light harvesting complex (chromophore) via the promotion of transcription factors. By doing so, they create what can be thought of as a “light switch”. The light switch bacteriophytochrome that is utilised by ''Agrobacterium'' and ''Deinococcus'' has the domain structure: PAS-GAF-PHY-HisKinase, and is able to cause a shift in conformation of the chromophore complex according to the wavelength absorbed. Essentially, what this means is that two different chromophores from two different phytochromes can activate two separate pathways due to their slight differences in light absorbance affinity. <br><br>  
-
For a light switch to be self-sufficient and fully functional, two main components are required: a heme oxygenase and a bacteriophytochrome coupled with ribosome binding sites. The heme oxygenase is required for the degradation of the porphyrin heme (which is naturally occuring in ''E.coli'') to form the linear tetrapyrrole biliverdin which is then able to bind to the GAF domain of the bacteriophytochrome.This forms the chromophore complex producing a colour according to the ratio of red to far-red light absorbed.<br>  
+
For a light switch to be self-sufficient and fully functional two main components are required: 1) A heme oxygenase enzyme and 2) the bacteriophytochrome coupled with ribosome binding sites. The heme oxygenase is required for the degradation of the porphyrin heme (which is naturally occuring in ''E.coli'') to form the linear tetrapyrrole biliverdin [10]. Biliverdin is then able to bind to the GAF domain of the bacteriophytochrome, forming the chromophore complex. A colour is thus produced according to the ratio of red to far-red light absorbed.<br><br>  
-
Various processes are influenced by phytochromes through photoconversion between two isomers. The phytochrome exists in a default off state (Pr) where it is biologically inactive. In this state, the phytochrome absorbs red light and converts to the far red state. A phytochrome in the far red state is considered to be in the active form, which absorbs far-red light. When in the Pr form, the phytochrome expresses a blue colour. If the balance of red/far red light absorbed shifts to the far red side, then the phytochrome is able to isomerise to a green colour. <br>
+
Phytochromes exist in a default off state (Pr) where the protein is biologically inactive [1]. In this state, the phytochrome absorbs red light and converts to the far red state (Pfr). A phytochrome in the far red state is considered to be in the active form, which absorbs far-red light. When in the Pr form, the phytochrome expresses a blue colour. If the balance of red/far red light absorbed shifts to the far red side, then the phytochrome is able to isomerise to a green colour [2,3,4]. Essentially, the phytochrome acts as an oscillating switch - hit it with red light and the chromophore emits a green colour, hit it with far red light and the chromophore emits a blue colour. This holds enormous potential for differential expression of two different kinase pathways (remember the phytochrome structure) while at the same time providing a clear detection mechanism.<br><br>
-
The bacteriophytochrome vector will be transformed into ''E. coli'' competent BL21 (DE3) cells, which contains the T7 RNA polyermase for the expression of T7 promoter regulated operons. As ''E. coli'' do not contain a native heme oxygenase gene, it must be incorporated into the final assembled operon construct along with a T7 promoter and the bacteriophytochrome genes from ''Deinococcus'' and ''Agrobacterium'' for the "light switch" to be self-assembled and functional. <br>
+
The bacteriophytochrome vector will be transformed into ''E. coli'' competent BL21 (DE3) cells, which contains the T7 RNA polyermase for the expression of T7 promoter regulated operons. As ''E. coli'' do not contain a native heme oxygenase gene, it must be incorporated into the final assembled operon construct along with a T7 promoter and the bacteriophytochrome genes from ''Deinococcus'' and ''Agrobacterium'' for the "light switch" to be self-assembled and functional. <br><br>
 +
 
 +
===References===
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
1. Park, C. M., Kim, J. I., Yang, S. S., Kang, J. G., Kang, J. H., Shim, J. Y., Chung, Y. H., Park, Y. M. & Song, P. S. (2000). A second photochromic bacteriophytochrome from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: spectral analysis and down-regulation by light. Biochemistry 39, 10840-7.<br>
 +
2. Karniol, B. & Vierstra, R. D. (2003). The pair of bacteriophytochromes from Agrobacterium tumefaciens are histidine kinases with opposing photobiological properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 2807-12.<br>
 +
3. Tarutina, M., Ryjenkov, D. A. & Gomelsky, M. (2006). An unorthodox bacteriophytochrome from Rhodobacter sphaeroides involved in turnover of the second messenger c-di-GMP. The Journal of biological chemistry 281, 34751-8.<br>
 +
4. Giraud, E., Fardoux, J., Fourrier, N., Hannibal, L., Genty, B., Bouyer, P., Dreyfus, B. & Vermeglio, A. (2002). Bacteriophytochrome controls photosystem synthesis in anoxygenic bacteria. Nature 417, 202-5.<br>
 +
5. Davis, S. J., Vener, A. V. & Vierstra, R. D. (1999). Bacteriophytochromes: phytochrome-like photoreceptors from nonphotosynthetic eubacteria. Science 286, 2517-20.<br>
 +
6. Wilde, A., Fiedler, B. & Borner, T. (2002). The cyanobacterial phytochrome Cph2 inhibits phototaxis towards blue light. Molecular microbiology 44, 981-8.<br>
 +
7. Rockwell, N. C., Su, Y. S. & Lagarias, J. C. (2006). Phytochrome structure and signaling mechanisms. Annual review of plant biology 57, 837-58.<br>
 +
8. Halliday, K. J. (2007). Photoreceptors and Associated Signaling I: Phytochromes. In Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science, pp. 881-884. 0 vols. Taylor & Francis.<br>
 +
9. Wagner, J. R., Zhang, J., Brunzelle, J. S., Vierstra, R. D. & Forest, K. T. (2007). High resolution structure of Deinococcus bacteriophytochrome yields new insights into phytochrome architecture and evolution. The Journal of biological chemistry 282, 12298-309.<br>
 +
10. Grangeiro, N. M., Aguiar, J. A., Chaves, H. V., Silva, A. A., Lima, V., Benevides, N. M., Brito, G. A., da Graca, J. R. & Bezerra, M. M. (2011). Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide-biliverdin pathway may be involved in the antinociceptive activity of etoricoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Pharmacological reports : PR 63, 112-9.<br><br>
=='''Aims'''==
=='''Aims'''==
-
The objective in this project is to build and characterise a biological light switch in ''E. coli''. This will involve construction of heme-oxygenase and bacteriophytochrome BioBrick parts. In 2010 the Macquarie Team cloned bacteriophytochrome from two sources. They showed that when one was expressed, it was functionally assembled when incubated with exogenous biliverdin; able to elicit a colour change when excited with far-red light. However, the part created is not directly usable as a BioBrick as it contains an internal ''Eco''RI site (''Deinococcus radiodurans'' phytochrome) and 2 ''Pst''I sites (''Agrobacterium tumefaciens'' phytochrome). As biliverdin is not native to ''E. coli'', the addition of heme oxygenase is required for the synthesis of bilivedin, enabling the self-assembly of the light switch. The 2010 Macquarie Team had managed to combine a ribosome binding site (RBS) to all 3 proteins of interest.
+
The objective in this project is to build and characterise a biological light switch in ''E. coli''. This will involve construction of heme-oxygenase and bacteriophytochrome BioBrick parts. In 2010 the Macquarie Team cloned bacteriophytochrome from two sources. They showed that when one was expressed, it was functionally assembled when incubated with exogenous biliverdin and able to elicit a colour change when excited with far-red light. However, the part created is not directly usable as a BioBrick as it contains an internal ''Eco''RI site (''Deinococcus radiodurans'' phytochrome) and 2 ''Pst''I sites (''Agrobacterium tumefaciens'' phytochrome). As biliverdin is not native to ''E. coli'', the addition of heme oxygenase is required for the synthesis of bilivedin, enabling the self-assembly of the light switch. The 2010 Macquarie Team had managed to combine a ribosome binding site (RBS) to all 3 proteins of interest.
Line 32: Line 46:
3. Assemble an operon consisting of the heme-oxygenase and bacteriophytochrome BioBrick parts.
3. Assemble an operon consisting of the heme-oxygenase and bacteriophytochrome BioBrick parts.
<br>
<br>
-
4. Optimise the gene expression from the operon such that the bacteriophytochrome light switch works without requiring the addition of biliverdin.
+
4. Optimise the gene expression from the operon such that the bacteriophytochrome light switch works without requiring the addition of biliverdin. <br>
= '''The Experiments''' =
= '''The Experiments''' =
Line 113: Line 127:
|}
|}
-
Primers were designed such that the amplicon would consists of at least the ''Xba''I site or ''Spe''I site; restricted by the length of the primers. As such, an ''Eco''RI or ''Pst''I restriction digest would not work for our BioBrick construction, resulting in the ''Xba''I and ''Spe''I digestion for the ligation. This then gives rise in the problem where the inserted coding sequence would be in the wrong orientation; ''Spe''I ligating with ''Xba''I instead. To solve this problem, we've decided to screen at least 10 colonies that grow on the antibiotic resistant plates, and perform an ''Xba''I digest to screen for inserts that are in the right orientation. Colony PCR was trialled, but due to the lack of difference between the right and wrong orientation of inserts (only 2 single base difference), the screening method was abandoned (see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook#26.2F8.2F11 notebook]).
+
Primers were designed such that the amplicon would consist of at least the ''Xba''I site or ''Spe''I site and be restricted by the length of the primers. As such, an ''Eco''RI or ''Pst''I restriction digest would not work for our BioBrick construction, resulting in the ''Xba''I and ''Spe''I digestion for the ligation. This creates a problem - the inserted coding sequence would be incorrectly orientated - ''Spe''I ligating with ''Xba''I instead. To solve this problem, we've decided to screen at least 10 colonies that grow on the antibiotic resistant plates, and perform an ''Xba''I digest to screen for inserts that are in the right orientation. Colony PCR was trialled, but due to the lack of difference between the right and wrong orientation of inserts (only 2 single base difference), the screening method was abandoned (see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook#26.2F8.2F11 notebook]).
=='''BioBrick Construction Method'''==
=='''BioBrick Construction Method'''==
Line 127: Line 141:
In contrast to the assembly protocol as proposed by iGEM, we've adopted a slightly different protocol. This can be applied when the antibiotic backbone of one of the parts remains the same (such as preparation for submission), while inserting the desired part. The screening of successful assembly can either be by protein expression (eg. T7 promoter part + GFP = fluoresce), PCR using BioBrick primers, or by plasmid extraction (successful assembly would have a larger band size). To enhance the efficiency of the assembly, alkaline phophatase treatment should be performed on the plasmid with the selection resistance to minimise re-ligation.
In contrast to the assembly protocol as proposed by iGEM, we've adopted a slightly different protocol. This can be applied when the antibiotic backbone of one of the parts remains the same (such as preparation for submission), while inserting the desired part. The screening of successful assembly can either be by protein expression (eg. T7 promoter part + GFP = fluoresce), PCR using BioBrick primers, or by plasmid extraction (successful assembly would have a larger band size). To enhance the efficiency of the assembly, alkaline phophatase treatment should be performed on the plasmid with the selection resistance to minimise re-ligation.
-
 
-
= Results =
 
-
 
-
==The Phytochromes==
 
-
 
-
The starting template that we had to work with was a RBS-coupled phytochrome coding sequence containing plasmid (for ''A. tumefaciens'') and PCR product (for ''D. radiodurans'') from the 2010 Macquarie iGEM team. Using the BioBrick compatible primers designed, PCR optimisation for the 2 phytochromes was screened over a range of temperatures, buffer types and cycle conditions (see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook#22-23.2F9.2F11 notebook]). When the desired product size was visible on the gel, the band was cut out and gel purified, subsequently following the BioBrick construction pipeline as mentioned. However, after the screening of the purified plasmid from the transformed cells, it seems that the plasmid contained no insert (for AT-Bph) or the wrong insert (for DR-Bph).
 
-
 
-
[[File:Results_-_DR_AT_bb_construct.jpg|450px]]
 
-
 
-
Green - plasmid backbone, Red - Size of ~1kb, corresponds with size of Red fluorescent protein, Blue - Size of plasmid show that there is no insert (based on previous experience, see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook#21.2F9.2F11 notebook])
 
-
 
-
Despite having alkaline phosphatase treatment, and gel purification of the cut plasmid backbone (not shown), the re-ligation of the backbone, and the appearance of the red fluorescent protein, showed that the BioBrick construction of the phytochromes failed. Hence, PCR optimisation to get a better product was performed, this time with a much lower annealing temperature (40 &deg;C), screening a range of different templates that was available.
 
-
 
-
[[File:Results - AT PCR.jpg|200px]][[File:REsults_-_DR_PCR.jpg|250px]]
 
-
 
-
AT-Bph PCR (left), DR-Bph PCR (right), Red circle - Desired band size
 
-
 
-
However, we did not have enough time to continue with the rest of the construction as time went out.
 
-
 
-
In conclusion, we learnt that:
 
-
 
-
* For PCR, the annealing temperature used should be determined by the annealing region of the primer. In this case, at the start, we have been using annealing temperatures that were too high for the annealing region. As such, only when a lower annealing temperature was used (40 &deg;C) did a good amplification occur.
 
-
* A low annealing temperature, however, increases the chances of non-specific amplification, which can be seen in the gel photos. To deal with this, new primers should be designed, where the annealing region to the template is increased, while reducing the upstream region of the restriction cut site.
 
-
* For plasmid backbones cut with compatible ends, alkaline phosphatase treated products used should be made fresh each time, to reduce the chances of re-ligation.
 
-
 
-
==Heme Oxygenase 1==
 
-
 
-
The PCR optimisation of the RBS-coupled heme oxygenase 1 coding sequence was successful from the start (see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook#12-19.2F8.2F2011 notebook]), and much more effort was put into the construction of the HO-BioBrick, and the assembly with a T7 promoter ([http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I719005 BBa_I719005] and [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I712074 BBa_I712074]).
 
-
 
-
 
-
After the initial failure of the ligation of the HO-PCR product with the plasmid backbone, and the lack of specificity of the colony PCR (see [https://2011.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Notebook#2.2F9.2F2011 notebook]), the BioBrick construction pipeline was adopted, using a new batch of alkaline phosphatase treated backbone, and the ''Xba''I restriction digest as a screening method. Despite getting only 1 colony from the transformation, the single colony proved to be right on target, giving us our first successful BioBrick.
 
-
 
-
[[File:Results_-_HO_screen.jpg|150px]][[File:Results_-_HO-bb_confirmation.jpg|150px]]
 
-
 
-
(Left) The comparison of the uncut plasmid size (pSC-HO) with the RFP-plasmid (pSC-RFP) and the re-ligated plasmid (pSC-empty) showed a successful insertion of the HO gene; smaller than RFP-plasmid, but larger than the re-ligated plasmid. The ''Xba''I digest gave prove of the gene orientation; a plasmid able to be digested with ''Xba''I.
 
-
 
-
(Right) Confirmation of the HO-BioBrick ([http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K646000 BBa_K646000]) was performed, using both PCR and a restriction digest using ''Xba''I and ''Pst''I. Although the gel was not well resolved, the similarity of the PCR product size when compared with the original template, and that a gene fragment was cleaved out of the HO-BioBrick, was good enough to conclude that the HO-BioBrick construction was successful.
 
-
 
-
 
-
</p>
 
-
To test our HO-BioBrick, we assembled it to a T7 promoter, supplied in the iGEM distribution pack (plate 1, location 15N and 6N). Using our alternative assembly method, we digested the T7 promoter bricks with ''Spe''I and ''Pst''I, and inserted our HO-BioBrick cut with ''Xba''I and ''Pst''I, transformed into Bl21(DE3)Tuner ''E. coli'' cells. Selection was done on ampicillin plates (T7 bricks have amp-resistance) that also contained ALA (d-aminolevulinic acid, for heme pathway) and IPTG for induction of protein expression in Bl21(DE3)Tuner ''E. coli'' cells. A functional heme oxygenase would be able to metabolise heme into biliverdin, which causes the cells to look green.
 
-
 
-
'''''PLATE PHOTO NEEDED!!!'''''
 
-
 
-
 
-
<html>
 
-
<body>
 
-
<div id="banner1" style="text-align: center;">
 
-
<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4a/Sponsor_logo_mq.gif"  width="450" ></a>
 
-
</div>
 
-
</body>
 
-
</html>
 

Latest revision as of 09:53, 5 October 2011



Contents

Our project

Background

Phytochromes were first discovered in plants and were found to be associated with photo-perception - indeed, they are classed as photoreceptors. They are now known to exist in all plant species as well as some species of fungi and bacteria [2,5]. Plants use phytochromes as ambient light sensors involved for morphological development such as the germination of seeds, flower generation, responses to sunlight and position relative to shade [1,5,6,7,8,9]. Phytochrome proteins act as light sensors by absorbing red/far red light, however some phytochromes can detect light between the UV-A to far-red regions.

Bacteriophytochromes act as photoreceptors for bacteria, mediating sensory responses to their light environment [4,6]. Bacteriophytochromes can also act as protein kinases triggered by light. These are able to modify or regulate various components in the cell such as protein activity and the synthesis of the light harvesting complex (chromophore) via the promotion of transcription factors. By doing so, they create what can be thought of as a “light switch”. The light switch bacteriophytochrome that is utilised by Agrobacterium and Deinococcus has the domain structure: PAS-GAF-PHY-HisKinase, and is able to cause a shift in conformation of the chromophore complex according to the wavelength absorbed. Essentially, what this means is that two different chromophores from two different phytochromes can activate two separate pathways due to their slight differences in light absorbance affinity.

For a light switch to be self-sufficient and fully functional two main components are required: 1) A heme oxygenase enzyme and 2) the bacteriophytochrome coupled with ribosome binding sites. The heme oxygenase is required for the degradation of the porphyrin heme (which is naturally occuring in E.coli) to form the linear tetrapyrrole biliverdin [10]. Biliverdin is then able to bind to the GAF domain of the bacteriophytochrome, forming the chromophore complex. A colour is thus produced according to the ratio of red to far-red light absorbed.

Phytochromes exist in a default off state (Pr) where the protein is biologically inactive [1]. In this state, the phytochrome absorbs red light and converts to the far red state (Pfr). A phytochrome in the far red state is considered to be in the active form, which absorbs far-red light. When in the Pr form, the phytochrome expresses a blue colour. If the balance of red/far red light absorbed shifts to the far red side, then the phytochrome is able to isomerise to a green colour [2,3,4]. Essentially, the phytochrome acts as an oscillating switch - hit it with red light and the chromophore emits a green colour, hit it with far red light and the chromophore emits a blue colour. This holds enormous potential for differential expression of two different kinase pathways (remember the phytochrome structure) while at the same time providing a clear detection mechanism.

The bacteriophytochrome vector will be transformed into E. coli competent BL21 (DE3) cells, which contains the T7 RNA polyermase for the expression of T7 promoter regulated operons. As E. coli do not contain a native heme oxygenase gene, it must be incorporated into the final assembled operon construct along with a T7 promoter and the bacteriophytochrome genes from Deinococcus and Agrobacterium for the "light switch" to be self-assembled and functional.

References


1. Park, C. M., Kim, J. I., Yang, S. S., Kang, J. G., Kang, J. H., Shim, J. Y., Chung, Y. H., Park, Y. M. & Song, P. S. (2000). A second photochromic bacteriophytochrome from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: spectral analysis and down-regulation by light. Biochemistry 39, 10840-7.
2. Karniol, B. & Vierstra, R. D. (2003). The pair of bacteriophytochromes from Agrobacterium tumefaciens are histidine kinases with opposing photobiological properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 2807-12.
3. Tarutina, M., Ryjenkov, D. A. & Gomelsky, M. (2006). An unorthodox bacteriophytochrome from Rhodobacter sphaeroides involved in turnover of the second messenger c-di-GMP. The Journal of biological chemistry 281, 34751-8.
4. Giraud, E., Fardoux, J., Fourrier, N., Hannibal, L., Genty, B., Bouyer, P., Dreyfus, B. & Vermeglio, A. (2002). Bacteriophytochrome controls photosystem synthesis in anoxygenic bacteria. Nature 417, 202-5.
5. Davis, S. J., Vener, A. V. & Vierstra, R. D. (1999). Bacteriophytochromes: phytochrome-like photoreceptors from nonphotosynthetic eubacteria. Science 286, 2517-20.
6. Wilde, A., Fiedler, B. & Borner, T. (2002). The cyanobacterial phytochrome Cph2 inhibits phototaxis towards blue light. Molecular microbiology 44, 981-8.
7. Rockwell, N. C., Su, Y. S. & Lagarias, J. C. (2006). Phytochrome structure and signaling mechanisms. Annual review of plant biology 57, 837-58.
8. Halliday, K. J. (2007). Photoreceptors and Associated Signaling I: Phytochromes. In Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science, pp. 881-884. 0 vols. Taylor & Francis.
9. Wagner, J. R., Zhang, J., Brunzelle, J. S., Vierstra, R. D. & Forest, K. T. (2007). High resolution structure of Deinococcus bacteriophytochrome yields new insights into phytochrome architecture and evolution. The Journal of biological chemistry 282, 12298-309.
10. Grangeiro, N. M., Aguiar, J. A., Chaves, H. V., Silva, A. A., Lima, V., Benevides, N. M., Brito, G. A., da Graca, J. R. & Bezerra, M. M. (2011). Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide-biliverdin pathway may be involved in the antinociceptive activity of etoricoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Pharmacological reports : PR 63, 112-9.

Aims

The objective in this project is to build and characterise a biological light switch in E. coli. This will involve construction of heme-oxygenase and bacteriophytochrome BioBrick parts. In 2010 the Macquarie Team cloned bacteriophytochrome from two sources. They showed that when one was expressed, it was functionally assembled when incubated with exogenous biliverdin and able to elicit a colour change when excited with far-red light. However, the part created is not directly usable as a BioBrick as it contains an internal EcoRI site (Deinococcus radiodurans phytochrome) and 2 PstI sites (Agrobacterium tumefaciens phytochrome). As biliverdin is not native to E. coli, the addition of heme oxygenase is required for the synthesis of bilivedin, enabling the self-assembly of the light switch. The 2010 Macquarie Team had managed to combine a ribosome binding site (RBS) to all 3 proteins of interest.


Hence, the aims of the team this year are to complete the light switch construction:
1. Assemble 3 fully functional BioBricks which are functionally expressed in E.coli.
2. Remove the restriction sites from the bacteriophytochrome which are incompatible with BioBrick assembly.
3. Assemble an operon consisting of the heme-oxygenase and bacteriophytochrome BioBrick parts.
4. Optimise the gene expression from the operon such that the bacteriophytochrome light switch works without requiring the addition of biliverdin.

The Experiments

Primer Design

Primer Sequence Melting temp (°C)
BB-FWD 5'- GAA TTC GCG GCC GCT TCT AGA -3' 59.7
BB-REV 5'- CTG CAG CGG CCG CTA CTA GTA -3' 61
T7-BB-FWD 5'- GAA TTC GCG GCC GCT TCT AGA TCT CGA TCC CGC G -3' 69.4
T7-BB-REV 5'- CTG CAG CGG CCG CTA CTA GTA GAG GGG AAT TGT TAT -3' 66.5
HO1-BB-FWD 5'- GCG GCC GCT TCT AGA CTT TAA GAA GGA GAT ATA C -3' 61.9
HO1-BB-REV 5'- GCG GCC GCT ACT AGT ACT TTC GGG CTT TGT TAG C -3' 67
DR-BB-FWD 5'- TCG CGG CCG CTT CTA GAA GGA GGG CTG CTA TGA GC -3' 71
DR-BB-REV 5'- GCG GCC GCT ACT AGT ATC AGG CAT CGG CGG CTC CCG G -3' 68.7
DR-M-FWD 5'- TTG CTG ATT CTG GAG TTC GAG CCG ACG GAG -3' 63.5
DR-M-REV 5'- CTC CGT CGG CTC GAA CTC CAG AAT CAG CAA -3' 61.7
AT-BB-FWD 5'- CGC GGC CGC TTC TAG AGA TTA GGA GGG CTG CTA TGA G -3' 69.1
AT-BB-REV 5'- GCG GCC GCT ACT AGT AGA TTT CAG GCA ATT TTT TCC -3' 64.3
AT-M1-FWD 5'- GTC CCT GCA TTA TCT TCA GAT GAT ATC AGA -3' 53.8
AT-M1-REV 5'- TCT GAT ATC ATC TGA AGA TAA TGC AGG GAC -3' 55.7
AT-M2-FWD 5'- GTG TTT CAG AGG CTT CAG CGG GTG GAG GA -3' 63.9
AT-M2-REV 5'- TCC TCC ACC CGC TGA AGC CTC TGA AAC AC -3' 64.5
BB - BioBrick compatible, M - Mutagenic primer (Italics - base mutation), Bold - Restriction sites

Primers were designed such that the amplicon would consist of at least the XbaI site or SpeI site and be restricted by the length of the primers. As such, an EcoRI or PstI restriction digest would not work for our BioBrick construction, resulting in the XbaI and SpeI digestion for the ligation. This creates a problem - the inserted coding sequence would be incorrectly orientated - SpeI ligating with XbaI instead. To solve this problem, we've decided to screen at least 10 colonies that grow on the antibiotic resistant plates, and perform an XbaI digest to screen for inserts that are in the right orientation. Colony PCR was trialled, but due to the lack of difference between the right and wrong orientation of inserts (only 2 single base difference), the screening method was abandoned (see notebook).

BioBrick Construction Method

Biobrick flowchart.jpg

1 - Qiagen Gel extraction kit, 2 - Sigma PCR clean up kit, 3 - Qiagen Spin Miniprep kit

Along with the PCR clean up of the pre-ligation products, the cut plasmid backbone was separated on a gel, and gel purified to remove any red fluorescent protein gene products.

Alternative Assembly Method

Alternate assembly method.jpg

In contrast to the assembly protocol as proposed by iGEM, we've adopted a slightly different protocol. This can be applied when the antibiotic backbone of one of the parts remains the same (such as preparation for submission), while inserting the desired part. The screening of successful assembly can either be by protein expression (eg. T7 promoter part + GFP = fluoresce), PCR using BioBrick primers, or by plasmid extraction (successful assembly would have a larger band size). To enhance the efficiency of the assembly, alkaline phophatase treatment should be performed on the plasmid with the selection resistance to minimise re-ligation.