Team:Glasgow/Results

From 2011.igem.org

Revision as of 12:11, 21 September 2011 by Ellin (Talk | contribs)

Results



Base Rate Dispersal of P. Aeruginosa

As we were trying to specifically disperse areas of biofilm it was necessary to establish a base rate of dispersal of the biofilm without using any of the dispersal mechanisms we designed. This would allow us to show quantitativly the increase in rate of dispersal that our different dispersal biobrick could generate when compared to a biofilm of non-transformed bacteria.

To measure the base rate of dispersal glass slides were put into 50ml tubes containing 20ml of LB broth. The LB covered around a third of the glass slide, this is the area where the biofilm would form. The LB was then inoculated with 20μl of overnight culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These tubes were then left on a bench top shaker at room temperature for a set amount of time (time points ranged from 1hr to 48hrs). After the biofilm had grown its alloted time the glass slide was carefully removed and placed into a fresh 50ml tube with 25ml of LB (which completely covered the biofilm) and left to allow the bacteria to disperse for 1hr. The slide was then transferred to a fresh 50ml tube with 25ml of LB. The biofilm is scraped off the slide using a thin flexible spatula. At this point both the dispersed cell and the biofilm scrapings were sonicated to stop clumping and plated in serial dilutions.

Base Rate Dispersal of E.coli Nissle 1917

The time series carried out with Nissle (details see lab books) showed that on average 48% of the cells within a biofilm will disperse once the biofilm is transferred into fresh media. The percentage dispersed was expected to be inversely correlated to the size of the biofilm, because we expected a larger biofilm to have a higher affinity for the cells it holds. However, the data shows that the percentage dispersed is relatively constant, and varies between 30-60% dispersal.

Graph of percentage dispersal from biofilm

Graph 1: The total percentage of cells dispersed when a biofilm is transferred into new media vs time in hours

The data also showed that over time the amount of cells firmly within a biofilm increases at a similar rate to those that disperse and are not attached to the biofilm.

Cell count of biofilm and planktonic cells vs time

Graph 2: The estimated number of dispersed cells compared to the number of biofilm cells vs time in hours


Modelling

The results regarding the biofilm dispersal we acquired using our single-cell models and some additional values are shown in the table below. We also created models for Phosphodiesterase activity and the multi-cell models for Latherin and Colicin E2. For more information, please visit Modelling site.

Results for modelling, base on the single-cell models
Name of the moleculeDiffusion rate (mm2/min)The critical concentration (molecule)Achieving Effective Concentration* (min)The attainable spatial resolution (mm)
Ranaspumin-21.68*10-4374280.09
T4 Endolysin1.52*10-4300052~0.01
Latherin1.38*10-4173290.08
Colicin E2 0.72*10-4162990~0.01
*For Colicin E2 and T4 Endolysin it is equal to the Critical Concentration. For Latherin and Ranaspumin-2 it is equal to 8x Critical Concentration

Here there are the two equations we used to determinate diffusion of the molecules through a biofilm:

Equation 1

where:
P (r,t) – number of molecules at the certain distance after a certain time
A – total number of molecules in the system
r – distance from point of origin (mm)
D – diffusion coefficient
t – time (min)

Equation 2

where:
Pf (r,t) – Final number of molecules at given distance at given time
P (r,t) – initial number of molecules according to Equation 1
λ – rate of degradation (molecule/min)
t – time passed (min)