Team:Glasgow/BiofilmResults

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 15: Line 15:
</td>
</td>
<td>
<td>
-
<img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6156/6166741226_e4cfd217bd_m.jpg" /><p><font size="1" color="grey">Picture 4: 10,000x SEM image of Nissle </br>showing the fimbriae</font></p>
+
<img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6156/6166741226_e4cfd217bd_m.jpg" /><p><font size="1" color="grey">Image 2: 10,000x SEM image of Nissle </br>showing the fimbriae</font></p>
</td>
</td>
<td>
<td>
Line 27: Line 27:
<td>
<td>
<img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6177/6170913398_6e217cc778_m.jpg"/>
<img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6177/6170913398_6e217cc778_m.jpg"/>
-
<p><font size="1" color="grey">Image 1: 1000x EM of P. aeruginosa biofilm, </br>showing its densely packed structure </br>(courtesy of Dan Walker, University of Glasgow)</font></p>
+
<p><font size="1" color="grey">Image 4: 1000x EM of P. aeruginosa biofilm, </br>showing its densely packed structure </br>(courtesy of Dan Walker, University of Glasgow)</font></p>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 33: Line 33:
</div>
</div>
</br>
</br>
 +
<table>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>
 +
<img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6156/6171223536_95ab16bc96_z.jpg">
 +
<p><font size="1" color="grey"> Figure 1: Comparison of RFP E.coli Nissle biofilms to untransformed E.coli Nissle bioflims under light microscope and under excitatory and non-excitatory wavelengths</font></p>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<td>
 +
<img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6175/6170690387_75d453a871_z.jpg">
 +
<p><font size="1" color="grey"> Figure 2: Comparison of RFP E.coli Nissle biofilms to puC19 E.coli Nissle biofilms under light microscope and under excitatory and non-excitatory wavelengths</font></p>
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<h2>Summary</h2>

Revision as of 02:31, 22 September 2011

Results

The images below show a selection of stages of biofilm formation. Starting with Image 1 showing a lab strain of E.colithat has no fimbriae, and is not forming a biofilm.

Image 2 shows an EM of E.coli Nissle 1917 in the early stages of biofilm formation. The fimbriae that allow the cells to cling to each other are clearly visible.

Image 3 shows a Nissle biofilm in the later stages of formation, with the cells densely packed and the extracellular matrix that holds them together showing.

Image 1: 15,000x EM of E.coli for comparison.
No fimbriae or EPS is visible.
(courtesy of Rocky Mountain Laboratories)

Image 2: 10,000x SEM image of Nissle
showing the fimbriae

Image 3: SEM image of Nissle biofilm
showing the extracellular matrix

Image 4: 1000x EM of P. aeruginosa biofilm,
showing its densely packed structure
(courtesy of Dan Walker, University of Glasgow)


Figure 1: Comparison of RFP E.coli Nissle biofilms to untransformed E.coli Nissle bioflims under light microscope and under excitatory and non-excitatory wavelengths

Figure 2: Comparison of RFP E.coli Nissle biofilms to puC19 E.coli Nissle biofilms under light microscope and under excitatory and non-excitatory wavelengths

Summary

- New Chassis

-Transformable

- Forms biofilms

- Non-pathogenic and compatible with majority of biobricks

-No shuttle vector necessary

-Time series shows that biofilm grows at similar speed to planktonic cells

Well suited for biofilm investigation, especially when intending to transform the biofilm